Effects of a Reading Fluency Intervention on Middle School Students Attending a Residential Treatment Center for Youth with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
In the USA, students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) are among the most vulnerable to have reading difficulties, experience general academic failure, and drop out of school. Students with EBD who receive schooling in residential treatment centers are at even greater risk for academic difficulties. To date, very little research has examined the impact of reading interventions for students educated within a residential treatment center. The primary goal of this two-part study was to evaluate the effects of a reading intervention with four students with EBD who were attending a residential treatment center. Each student received an evidence-based reading fluency intervention to increase their reading skills, and data collected in a multiple baseline design across participants demonstrated that each student responded favorably to the intervention. Standardized reading assessments, administered pre-post, supported evidence of intervention effectiveness. Implications for applied research and practice are discussed, including the implications for using participants’ feedback to modify and enhance intervention procedures.
KeywordsEmotional and behavioral disorders Reading, fluency Residential treatment Middle school
Compliance with Ethical Standards
We attest to the following:
• Animals were not used in this research.
• All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the NC State University Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Also, informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- AIMSweb (2016). AIMS Web home page. Retrieved from http://aimsweb.com/
- Begeny, J. C. (2011). Effects of the Helping Early Literacy with Practice Strategies (HELPS) reading fluency program when implemented at different frequencies. School Psychology Review, 40, 149–157.Google Scholar
- Christ, T., & Silberglitt, B. (2007). Estimates of the standard error of measurement for curriculum based measures of oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 36, 130–146.Google Scholar
- Espin, C., & Foegen, A. (1996). Validity of three general outcome measures for predicting secondary students’ performance on content-area tasks. Exceptional Children, 62, 497–514.Google Scholar
- Florida Department of Education. (2005). Primary and secondary diagnostic instruments. Retrieved from http://justreadflorida.com/educators/PrimSecDiagChart.asp?style=normal
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 20 U.S.C. 1413(e)(3) and (4) §300.224 (2004).Google Scholar
- Kame'enui, E., Francis, D., Fuchs, L., Roland, H., Good, I., O’Connor, R., Simmons, D. C., et al., (2002). An analysis of reading assessment instruments for k-3 (report). Eugene: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement, College of Education, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
- Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices. IES Practice Guide. NCEE 2008-4027. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.Google Scholar
- Lane, K. L., Wehby, J. H., Little, M. A., & Cooley, C. A. (2005). Academic, social, and behavioral profiles of students with emotional disorders educated in self-contained classrooms and self-contained schools: Part one-are they more alike than different. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Technical manual. Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
- National Center on Response to Intervention (2011). Progress monitoring tools. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/progressMonitoringTools/
- National Center on Student Progress Monitoring (2007). Review of progress monitoring tools. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://www.studentprogress.org/chart/chart.asp
- National Reading Panel (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction, Reports of the subgroups. Retrieved from https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
- Pearson, N. C. S. (2012). AIMSweb technical manual. Pearson: Bloomington.Google Scholar
- Quinn, M. M., Rutherford, R. B., Leone, P. E., Osher, D. M., & Poirier, J. M. (2005). Youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 71, 339–345.Google Scholar
- Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin: PRO-ED Publishing, Inc..Google Scholar
- Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Torgesen, J., Schirm, A., Castner, L., Vartivarian, S., Mansfield, W., Myers, D., … & Haan, C. (2007). National Assessment of Title I. Final Report. Vol II: Closing the reading gap—findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers. NCEE 2008-4013. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.Google Scholar
- Wagner, M., Marder, C., Blackorby, J., Cameto, R., Newman, L., Levine, P., & Davies-Mercier, E. (2003). The Achievements of youth with disabilities during secondary school. A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS-2). Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2003_11/nlts2_report_2003_11_complete.pdf
- Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., & Levine, P. (2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities. A report of findings from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS-2). Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2006_07/nlts2_report_2006_07_complete.pdf
- Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2001). Gray oral reading test-IV. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar