Advertisement

Contemporary School Psychology

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 31–46 | Cite as

Building Bridges for New Immigrant Students Through Asset-Based Consultation

  • Yolanda C. BarbaEmail author
  • Andrew Newcombe
  • Rachel Ruiz
  • Natalya Cordero
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The number of immigrant students enrolling in California schools is increasing and teaching them effectively requires adapted approaches to affirm their linguistic and cultural diversity. Educators feel underprepared to meet the complex needs of students who represent hundreds of languages and cultures. Many immigrant children are frequently also dual-language or English learners who struggle to meet the academic demands of today’s fast-paced schools, and teachers need to know specific information about newcomer challenges to maintain and affirm their linguistic and cultural strengths. Given this cultural shift, how can school psychologists break down barriers and assist teachers in working with newly arrived immigrant students? This paper provides school psychologists with strength-based practices to begin building educational bridges for immigrant students through an adapted consultative approach. The proposed Asset-Based Consultation model combines instructional consultation and the Cultural Assets Identifier within a multicultural, response-to-intervention framework, individually tailored to support school psychologists as they consult with teachers on how to best address the academic, social, and emotional needs of newcomer students in our increasingly diverse educational landscape.

Keywords

Immigrant students Strength-based practices Cultural assets Asset-based consultation Multicultural consultation Culturally responsive interventions Culturally competent school psychologist 

Notes

Funding

This article was funded by a U.S. Office of English Language Acquisition (OELA) grant T365Z120192, Cultural-Linguistic Advocates for Spanish-Speaking English-Learners.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Abe-Kim, J., Takeuchi, D. T., Hong, S., Zane, N., Sue, S., Spencer, M. S., & Alegria, M. (2007). Use of mental health-related services among immigrant and U. S.-born Asian Americans: Results from the National Latino and Asian American study. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 91–98.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.098541.Google Scholar
  2. Adesope, O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2010). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 207–245.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310368803.Google Scholar
  3. Aganza, J., Godinez, A., Smith, D., Gonzalez, L. G., & Robinson-Zañartu, C. (2015). Using cultural assets to enhance assessment of Latino students. Contemporary School Psychology, 19(1), 30–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0041-7.Google Scholar
  4. Bialystok, E. (2011). Reshaping the mind: The benefits of bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Experimentale, 65(4), 229–235.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025406.Google Scholar
  5. Bramlett, R. K., Murphy, J. J., Johnson, J., Wallingsford, L., & Hall, J. D. (2002). Contemporary practices in school psychology: A national survey of roles and referral problems. Psychology in Schools, 39, 327–335.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10022.Google Scholar
  6. CalEdFacts. (2017). Facts about English Learners in California—CalEdFacts. California Department of Education.https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/cefelfacts.asp. Accessed 25 January 2018.
  7. Capps, R., Fix, M., Ost, J., Reardon-Anderson, J., & Passel, J. S. (2005). The health and well-being of young children of immigrants (immigrant families and workers: Facts and perspectives). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Carvalho, C., Dennison, A., & Estrella, I. (2014). Best practices in the assessment of English language learners. In J. P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Foundations (pp. 75–88). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  9. Center for Applied Linguistics (2018). Newcomer Center, Pasadena CA. http://webapp.cal.org/Newcomer/NewcomerDetails.aspx?id=243. Accessed 25 January 2018.
  10. Child Trends Databank. (2014). Dual language learners. https://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=dual-language-learners. Accessed 28 January 2018.
  11. Climie, E., & Henley, L. (2016). A renewed focus on strengths-based assessment in schools. British Journal of Special Education, 43(2), 108–121.Google Scholar
  12. Collier, C. (2011). Seven steps to separating difference from disability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Collier, V. P., & Thomas, W. P. (1989). How quickly can immigrants become proficient in school English? Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 5, 26–38.Google Scholar
  14. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego: College-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Cummins, J. (1994). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. Schooling and language-minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–50). California State University: School of Education.Google Scholar
  16. Custodio, B. (2010). How to design and implement a newcomer program. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  17. DataQuest. (2017). Data & Statistics, Demographics: DataQuest. California Department of Education. https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/. Accessed 25 January 2018.
  18. Doran, P. R. (2017). Teachers' self-reported knowledge regarding English learners: Perspectives on culturally and linguistically inclusive instruction and intervention. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(5), 557–572.Google Scholar
  19. Elizalde-Utnick, G., & Guerrero, C. (2014). Best practices in school-based services for immigrant children and families. In P. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Foundations (pp. 99–111). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  20. Epstein, M. H. (1999). The development and validation of a scale to assess the emotional and behavioral strengths of children and adolescents. Remedial and Special Education, 20(5), 258–262.Google Scholar
  21. Garcia-Joslin, J. J., Carrillo, G. L., Guzman, V., Vega, D., Plotts, C. A., & Lasser, J. (2016). Latino immigration: Preparing school psychologists to meet students’ needs. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(2), 256–269.Google Scholar
  22. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  23. Gutkin, T. B. (1999). Collaborative versus directive/prescriptive/expert school-based consultation: Reviewing and resolving a false dichotomy. Journal of School Psychology, 37(2), 161–190.Google Scholar
  24. Hernandez, D. J., & Napierala, J. S. (2012). Children in immigrant families: Essential to America's future. New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development.Google Scholar
  25. Hughes, J. N., Erchul, W. P., Yoon, J., Jackson, T., & Henington, C. (1997). Consultant use of questions and its relationship to consultee evaluation of effectiveness. Journal of School Psychology, 35(3), 281–297.Google Scholar
  26. Hylander, I. (2004). Analysis of conceptual change in consultee-centered consultation. In N. M. Lambert, I. Hylander, & J. H. Sandoval (Eds.), Consultee-centered consultation: Improving the quality of professional services in schools and community organizations (45–61). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Ingraham, C. L. (2000). Consultation through a multicultural lens: Multicultural and cross-cultural consultation in schools. School Psychology Review, 29(3), 320–343.Google Scholar
  28. Ingraham, C. L. (2003). Multicultural consultee-centered consultation: When novice consultants explore cultural hypotheses with experienced teacher consultees. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 14(3–4), 329–362.Google Scholar
  29. Ingraham, C. L. (2014). Studying multicultural aspects of consultation. In W. P. Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation (pp. 323–348). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, J., Bahr, M., & Navarro, V. (2017). School psychology and cultural competence: Room to grow? Educational Policy, 089590481774154.Google Scholar
  31. Kerwin, C. (1995). Consultation models revisited: A practitioner's perspective. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 6(4), 373–383.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532768xjepc0604_7.Google Scholar
  32. LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H. L., & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 395–412.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, H., & Kim, K. H. (2010). Relationships between bilingualism and adaptive creative style, innovative creative style, and creative strengths among Korean American students. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 402–407.Google Scholar
  34. Lopez, E. C., & Bursztyn, A. M. (2013). Future challenges and opportunities: Toward culturally responsive training in school psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 50(3), 212–228.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21674.Google Scholar
  35. Lopez, E. C., & Truesdell, L. (2007). Multicultural issues in instructional consultation for English language learning students. Handbook of multicultural school psychology: An interdisciplinary perspective, 71–98.Google Scholar
  36. Meca, A., Sabet, R. F., Farrelly, C. M., Benitez, C. G., Schwartz, S. J., Gonzales-Backen, M., et al. (2017). Personal and cultural identity development in recently immigrated Hispanic adolescents: Links with psychosocial functioning. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23(3), 348–361.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000129.Google Scholar
  37. Meyers, J., & Varjas, K. (2016). An agenda for research and practice related to multicultural approaches to school-based consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 26(3), 304–311.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2016.1187569.Google Scholar
  38. Morrison, K. A., Robbins, H. H., & Rose, D. G. (2008). Operationalizing culturally relevant pedagogy: A synthesis of classroom-based research. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41(4), 433–452.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680802400006.Google Scholar
  39. National Association of School Psychologists. (2015). The provision of psychological services to bilingual students (Position Statement). https://www.nasponline.org/x32086.xml. Accessed 4 December 2017.
  40. Nguyen, A. M. D., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2013). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 122–159.Google Scholar
  41. Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2008). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  42. O’Bryon, E. C., & Rogers, M. R. (2016). Using consultation to support English learners: The experiences of bilingual school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 53(3), 225–239.Google Scholar
  43. Okagaki, L., & Frensch, P. A. (1998). Parenting and children’s school achievement: A multiethnic perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 123–144.Google Scholar
  44. Pastor, S., & Williams, B. (2010). The inclusion of cultural brokers in school crisis response: Becoming a more culturally competent school psychologist. National Association of School Psychologists. Communique, 39(4), 16–17.Google Scholar
  45. Patel, S. G., Clarke, A. V., Eltareb, F., Macciomei, E. E., & Wickham, R. (2016). Newcomer immigrant adolescents: A mixed-methods examination of family stressors and school outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(2), 168–180.Google Scholar
  46. Roberts, T. (2014). Not so silent after all: Examination and analysis of the silent stage in childhood second language acquisition. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(1), 22–40.Google Scholar
  47. Rogers, M. R. (2000). Examining the cultural context of consultation. School Psychology Review, 29, 414–18.Google Scholar
  48. Rogers, M. R., & Lopez, E. C. (2002). Identifying critical cross-cultural school psychology competencies. Journal of School Psychology, 40(2), 115–141.Google Scholar
  49. Rosenfield, S. (1987). Instructional consultation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenfield, S. (2008). Best practices in instructional consultation and instructional consultation teams. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1645–1660). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  51. Rosenfield, S. A., & Gravois, T. A. (1996). Instructional consultation teams: Collaborating for change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  52. Salas, S., Jones, J. P., Perez, T., Fitchett, P. G., & Kissau, S. (2013). Habla con ellos-talk to them: Latinas/os, achievement, and the middle grades. Middle School Journal, 45(1), 18–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2013.11461878.Google Scholar
  53. Sheridan, S. M. (2000). Considerations of multiculturalism and diversity in behavioral consultation with parents and teachers. School Psychology Review, 29(3), 344–353.Google Scholar
  54. Sibley, E., & Brabeck, K. (2017). Latino immigrant students’ school experiences in the United States: The importance of family-school collaborations. School Community Journal, 27(1), 137–158.Google Scholar
  55. Sirikantraporn, S. (2013). Biculturalism as a protective factor: An exploratory study on resilience and the bicultural level of acculturation among southeast Asian American youth who have witnessed domestic violence. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(2), 109–115.Google Scholar
  56. Suárez-Orozco, C., & Suárez-Orozco, M. (2002). Children of immigration: The developing child. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Suárez-Orozco, C., Pimental, A., & Martin, M. (2009). The significance of relationships: Academic engagement and achievement amount newcomer immigrant youth. Teachers College Record, 111(3), 712–749.Google Scholar
  58. Tarver Behring, S., & Ingraham, C. L. (1998). Culture as a central component to consultation: A call to the field. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 9, 57–72.Google Scholar
  59. Valencia, R. R., & Black, M. S. (2002). “Mexican Americans don’t value education!”—the basis of myth, mythmaking, and debunking. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1(2), 81–103.Google Scholar
  60. Vega, D., Lasser, J., & Plotts, C. (2015). Global migration: The need for culturally competent school psychologists. School Psychology International, 36(4), 358–374.Google Scholar
  61. Yaafouri-Kreuzer, L. E. (2017). How home visits transformed my teaching. Educational Leadership, 75(1), 20–25.Google Scholar
  62. Zong, J., Batalova, J., & Hallock, J. (2018) Frequently requested statistics on immigrants and immigration in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/frequently-requested-statistics-immigrants-and-immigration-united-states. Accessed 13 June 2018.

Copyright information

© California Association of School Psychologists 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counseling and School PsychologySan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations