Cognitive Mediators of Reading Comprehension in Early Development
- 68 Downloads
Although the empirical relationship between general intelligence and academic achievement is well established, that between specific cognitive abilities and achievement is less so. This study investigated the relationships between specific Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and reading comprehension across a large sample of children (N = 835) at different periods of reading development (grades 1–5). Results suggest select cognitive variables predict reading comprehension above and beyond basic reading skills. However, the relative importance of specific cognitive abilities in predicting reading comprehension differs across grade levels. Further analyses using mediation models found specific cognitive abilities mediated the effects of basic reading skills on reading comprehension. Implications for the important and dynamic role of cognitive abilities in predicting reading comprehension across development are discussed.
KeywordsAssessment Intelligence Reading comprehension Cattell-Horn-Carroll Mediation
The authors would like to thank the Woodcock-Muñoz Foundation for granting us permission to use the standardization data from the Normative Update of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities, Third Edition and Tests of Achievement, Third Edition.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Scott L. Decker, Ph.D. previously received research and training grants from Riverside Publishing and the Woodcock-Munoz Foundation.
Julia Englund Strait, Ph.D. declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Alycia M. Roberts, Ph.D. previously received renumeration on a per-participant basis for testing subjects from Riverside Publishing.
Emma Kate Wright, M.A. declares that she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human subjects were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study. The current study used an existing data set. Individual consent was obtained in the original standardization study for the Normative Update of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities, Third Edition and Tests of Achievement, Third Edition.
- Elliott, C. D., Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Dorvil, C., & Moldovan, J. (2010). Differential ability scales-II prediction of reading performance: global scores are not enough. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 698–720.Google Scholar
- Evans, J. J., Floyd, R. G., McGrew, K. S., & Leforgee, M. H. (2001). The relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and reading achievement during childhood and adolescence. School Psychology Review, 31(2), 246–262.Google Scholar
- Fielding, L. G., & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Reading comprehesion: what works. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 62–67.Google Scholar
- Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2007). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (Second ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Is "Learning Disability" just a fancy term for low achievement? A meta-analysis of reading differences between low achievers with and without the label. Paper presented at the Learning Disabilities Summit: Building a Foundation for the Future White Papers.Google Scholar
- Hajovsky, D., Reynolds, M. R., Floyd, R. G., Turek, J. J., & Keith, T. Z. (2014). A multigroup investigation of latent cognitive abilities and reading achievement relations. School Google Scholar
- Hale, J. B., Flanagan, D. P., & Naglieri, J. A. (2008). Alternative research-based methods for IDEA (2004) identification of children with specific learning disabilities. Communiqué, 36(8), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligence testing with the WISC-III. New York: John Wiley & Sones, INC..Google Scholar
- McGrew, K. S. (1993). The relationship between the Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised Gf-Gc cognitive clusters and reading achievement across the lifespan. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39–53.Google Scholar
- McGrew, K. S., Schrank, F. A., & Woodcock, R. (2007). Technical manual: Woodcock-Johnson III normative update. Rolling Meadows: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
- Roberts, R. D., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2012). From general intelligence to multiple intelligences: meanings, models, and measures. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 2: individual differences and cultural and contextual factors. Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Schrank, F. A., Miller, D. C., Wendling, B. J., & Woodcock, R. W. (2010). Essentials of WJ III cognitive abilities assessment (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition of literacy. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Watkins, M. W. (2003). IQ subtest analysis: clinical acumen or clinical illusion? The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 2(2).Google Scholar
- Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar