Advertisement

Design for Additive Manufacturing of Functionally Graded Lattice Structures: A Design Method with Process Induced Anisotropy Consideration

  • Cong Hong Phong Nguyen
  • Youngdoo Kim
  • Young ChoiEmail author
Regular Paper
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

Lattice structures are well-known as a solution for designing parts with lightweight and multifunctional characteristics. Owing to the advancement of additive manufacturing (AM), the development of design methods for additively manufactured lattice structures has extensively progressed, especially for functionally graded lattice structures (FGLS). Despite plenty of available design frameworks, the application of AM constraints in the design of FGLS is limited to geometric issues. Further, there is a lack of design methods that consider the unique physical properties of additively manufactured parts, especially the anisotropic characteristics induced by AM processes. This paper proposes a novel method for the design of additively manufactured functionally graded lattice structures with the consideration of AM anisotropic properties. In addition, a customized anisotropic AM-Lattice material model that supports the design of FGLS through the density-variable topology optimization is proposed. Moreover, Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process in which the process-induced anisotropy of AM is clearly demonstrated is focused. The design method was validated by the three-point bending-beam design problem, a classical design problem for validating topology optimization. The results, showing agreements between simulations and experiments, prove the validity and practicality of the proposed method.

Keywords

Functionally graded lattice structure Additive manufacturing Anisotropic properties Topology optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was in part supported by the Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship in 2017 and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.2019R1A2C1002010). The authors would like to thank Professor Seung Hwan Chang at the School of Mechanical Engineering, Chung-Ang University for providing equipment and advice for the bending experiments.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gibson, L. J., & Ashby, M. F. (1997). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties (Cambridge Solid State Science Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosen, D. W. (2007). Computer-aided design for additive manufacturing of cellular structures. Computer-Aided Design and Applications,4(5), 585–594.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2007.10738493.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dong, G. Y., Tang, Y. L., & Zhao, Y. F. (2017). A survey of modeling of lattice structures fabricated by additive manufacturing. Journal of Mechanical Design,139(10), 100906–100913.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tamburrino, F., Graziosi, S., & Bordegoni, M. (2018). The Design Process of Additively Manufactured Mesoscale Lattice Structures: A Review. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering,18(4), 040801–040816.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tao, W., & Leu, M. C. (2016). Design of lattice structure for additive manufacturing. In 2016 International Symposium on Flexible Automation (ISFA), Cleveland, Ohio, USA, August 1–3, 2016 (pp. 325–332).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISFA.2016.7790182.
  6. 6.
    McGregor, D. J., Tawfick, S., & King, W. P. (2019). Mechanical properties of hexagonal lattice structures fabricated using continuous liquid interface production additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing,25, 10–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu, C., Qi, M., Islam, S., Chen, P., Gao, S., Xu, Y., et al. (2018). Mechanical performance of 3D-printing plastic honeycomb sandwich structure. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,5(1), 47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0005-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choy, S. Y., Sun, C. N., Leong, K. F., & Wei, J. (2017). Compressive properties of functionally graded lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Materials and Design,131, 112–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ling, C., Cernicchi, A., Gilchrist, M. D., & Cardiff, P. (2019). Mechanical behaviour of additively-manufactured polymeric octet-truss lattice structures under quasi-static and dynamic compressive loading. Materials and Design,162, 106–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Song, J., Zhou, W., Wang, Y., Fan, R., Wang, Y., Chen, J., et al. (2019). Octet-truss cellular materials for improved mechanical properties and specific energy absorption. Materials and Design.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gorguluarslan, R. M., Gandhi, U. N., Song, Y. Y., & Choi, S. K. (2017). An improved lattice structure design optimization framework considering additive manufacturing constraints. Rapid Prototyping Journal,23(2), 305–319.  https://doi.org/10.1108/Rpj-10-2015-0139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lim, Y.-E., Park, J.-H., & Park, K. (2018). Automatic Design of 3D Conformal Lightweight Structures Based on a Tetrahedral Mesh. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,5(4), 499–506.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0053-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng, J., Fu, J., Shang, C., Lin, Z., & Li, B. (2019). Sandwich panel design and performance optimization based on triply periodic minimal surfaces. Computer-Aided Design,115, 307–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2019.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sychov, M. M., Lebedev, L. A., Dyachenko, S. V., & Nefedova, L. A. (2018). Mechanical properties of energy-absorbing structures with triply periodic minimal surface topology. Acta Astronautica,150, 81–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.12.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maskery, I., Sturm, L., Aremu, A. O., Panesar, A., Williams, C. B., Tuck, C. J., et al. (2018). Insights into the mechanical properties of several triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures made by polymer additive manufacturing. Polymer,152, 62–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tripathi, Y., & Shukla, M. (2017). Triply periodic minimal surface based geometry design of bio-scaffolds. In 2017 International Conference on Advances in Mechanical, Industrial, Automation and Management Systems (AMIAMS), Allahabad, February 3–5, 2017 (pp. 348–350).  https://doi.org/10.1109/AMIAMS.2017.8069237.
  17. 17.
    Martinez, J., Dumas, J., & Lefebvre, S. (2016). Procedural Voronoi Foams for Additive Manufacturing. ACM Transactions on Graphics,35(4), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2897824.2925922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kang, H., Lin, C. Y., & Hollister, S. J. (2010). Topology optimization of three dimensional tissue engineering scaffold architectures for prescribed bulk modulus and diffusivity. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,42(4), 633–644.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0508-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ashby, M. F. (2006). The properties of foams and lattices. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci,364(1838), 15–30.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1678.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nguyen, J., Park, S. I., & Rosen, D. (2013). Heuristic optimization method for cellular structure design of light weight components. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,14(6), 1071–1078.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0144-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giannitelli, S. M., Accoto, D., Trombetta, M., & Rainer, A. (2014). Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia,10(2), 580–594.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang, N., Tian, Y., & Zhang, D. (2015). Novel real function based method to construct heterogeneous porous scaffolds and additive manufacturing for use in medical engineering. Medical Engineering & Physics,37(11), 1037–1046.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoo, D. (2012). New paradigms in internal architecture design and freeform fabrication of tissue engineering porous scaffolds. Medical Engineering & Physics,34(6), 762–776.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li, D. W., Liao, W. H., Dai, N., Dong, G. Y., Tang, Y. L., & Xie, Y. M. (2018). Optimal design and modeling of Gyroid-based functionally graded cellular structures for additive manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design,104, 87–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2018.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guest, J. K., & Prevost, J. H. (2006). Optimizing multifunctional materials: design of microstructures for maximized stiffness and fluid permeability. International Journal of Solids and Structures,43(22–23), 7028–7047.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.03.001.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gomez, S., Vlad, M. D., Lopez, J., & Fernandez, E. (2016). Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia,42, 341–350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu, J. K., Gaynor, A. T., Chen, S. K., Kang, Z., Suresh, K., Takezawa, A., et al. (2018). Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,57(6), 2457–2483.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1994-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang, H., Chen, Y., & Rosen, D. W. (2005). A hybrid geometric modeling method for large scale conformal cellular structures. In Proceedings of the ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Volume 3: 25th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Parts A and B, Long Beach, California, USA. September 24–28, 2005 (pp. 421–427). ASME.  https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2005-85366.
  29. 29.
    Tang, Y. L., Kurtz, A., & Zhao, Y. F. (2015). Bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) based design method for lattice structure to be fabricated by additive manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design,69, 91–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tang, Y. L., Dong, G. Y., Zhou, Q. X., & Zhao, Y. F. (2018). Lattice structure design and optimization with additive manufacturing constraints. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering,15(4), 1546–1562.  https://doi.org/10.1109/Tase.2017.2685643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jin, X., Li, G. X., & Zhang, M. (2018). Design and optimization of nonuniform cellular structures. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C-Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science,232(7), 1280–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406217704677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang, P., Toman, J., Yu, Y., Biyikli, E., Kirca, M., Chmielus, M., et al. (2015). Efficient Design-Optimization of Variable-Density Hexagonal Cellular Structure by Additive Manufacturing: Theory and Validation. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering-Transactions of the Asme,137(2), 021004–021008.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tang, Y., & Zhao, Y. F. (2018). Multifunctional design of heterogeneous cellular structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1956-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cheng, L., Zhang, P., Biyikli, E., Bai, J. X., Robbins, J., & To, A. (2017). Efficient design optimization of variable-density cellular structures for additive manufacturing: theory and experimental validation. Rapid Prototyping Journal,23(4), 660–677.  https://doi.org/10.1108/Rpj-04-2016-0069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ahn, S. H., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., & Wright, P. K. (2002). Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal,8(4), 248–257.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540210441166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Casavola, C., Cazzato, A., Moramarco, V., & Pappalettere, C. (2016). Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory. Materials and Design,90, 453–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Somireddy, M., & Czekanski, A. (2017). Characterization of Material Behavior of the Fused Deposition Modeling Processed Parts. In Proceedings of the ASME 2017 12th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference collocated with the JSME/ASME 2017 6th International Conference on Materials and Processing, Volume 2: Additive Manufacturing; Materials. Los Angeles, California, USA. June 4–8, 2017. V002T01A014. ASME.  https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2017-2949.
  38. 38.
    Rodriguez, J. F., Thomas, J. P., & Renaud, J. E. (2003). Mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene fused deposition materials modeling. Rapid Prototyping Journal,9(4), 219–230.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540310489604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang, P., Liu, J. K., & To, A. C. (2017). Role of anisotropic properties on topology optimization of additive manufactured load bearing structures. Scripta Materialia,135, 148–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stankovic, T., Mueller, J., & Shea, K. (2017). The effect of anisotropy on the optimization of additively manufactured lattice structures. Additive Manufacturing,17, 67–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hassani, B., & Hinton, E. (1999). Homogenization theory for media with periodic structure. In B. Hassani & E. Hinton (Eds.), Homogenization and structural topology optimization (pp. 11–30). London: Springer, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dong, G., Tang, Y., & Zhao, Y. F. (2018). A 149 Line Homogenization Code for Three-Dimensional Cellular Materials Written in matlab. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology,141(1), 011005–011011.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Farah, S., Anderson, D. G., & Langer, R. (2016). Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications–A comprehensive review. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews,107, 367–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cheng, L., Bai, J., & To, A. C. (2019). Functionally graded lattice structure topology optimization for the design of additive manufactured components with stress constraints. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,344, 334–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.010.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate SchoolChung-Ang UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.School of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringChung-Ang UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations