Advertisement

Maximum Power-Point Tracking Control Using Perturb and Observe Algorithm for Tidal Current Generation System

  • Seok-Hwan MoonEmail author
  • Byung-Gun Park
  • Ji-Won Kim
  • Jang-Mok Kim
Regular Paper

Abstract

Because wind turbines and tidal current generation rely on irregular wind or tidal speed, maximum power-point tracking (MPPT) control is required in order to generate maximum turbine power. The most common turbine generation is obtained by employing the MPPT scheme using the tip speed ratio (TSR). However, this scheme has a disadvantage in that it relies on the characteristics of tidal current turbines, and it requires expensive tidal current speed-measurement equipment. The tidal current speed measurement is also affected by the installed location and distance to the equipment. To avoid these disadvantages, this paper proposes the maximum power control scheme using perturb and observe (P&O) for tidal current generation systems. The proposed P&O MPPT scheme can generate maximum power regardless of the characteristics of the turbine and the information about the tidal current speed. The reliability and suitability of the proposed scheme are proven using simulation and experiment results at the tidal current generation laboratory in Jin-do, South Korea.

Keywords

Tidal current generation system Maximum power-point tracking Perturb and observe 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was a part of the project titled “Development of active-controlled tidal stream generation technology” funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea (20110171).

References

  1. 1.
    Bahaj, A. S., et al. (2003). Fundamentals applicable to the utilization of marine current turbines for energy production. Transaction on Renewable Energy,28, 2205–2211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhandari, B., Poudel, S. R., Lee, K. T., & Ahn, S. H. (2014). Mathematical modeling of hybrid renewable energy system: A review on small hydro-solar-wind power generation. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,1(2), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, H., Ait-Ahmed, N., Machmoum, M., & Zaim, M. E. H. (2016). Modeling and vector control of marine current energy conversion system based on doubly salient permanent magnet generator. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy,7(1), 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elegendy, M. A., Zahawi, B., & Atkinson, D. J. (2015). Operating characteristics of the P&O algorithm at high perturbation frequencies for standalone PV systems. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion,30(1), 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elgendy, M. A., Zahawi, B., & Atkinson, D. J. (2012). Assessment of pertub and observe MPPT algorithm implementation techniques for PV pumping application. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy,3(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eltamaly, A. M., Alolah, A. I., & Farh, H. M. (2013). Maximum power extraction from utility-interfaced wind turbines. London: INTECH Open Access Publisher.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keyhani, A., Marwali, M. N., & Dai, M. (2010). Integration of green and renewable energy in electric power system. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, B. G., Yang, C. J., & Choi, M. S. (2012). A study on the performance of an 100 kW class tidal current turbine. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment and Safety,18(2), 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kjaer, S. B. (2012). Evaluation of the hill climbing and the incremental conductance maximum power point trackers for photovoltaic power systems. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion,27(4), 922–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lim, C. W. (2017). Design and manufacture of small-scale wind turbine simulator to emulate torque response of MW wind turbine. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,4(4), 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thiringer, T., MacEnri, J., & Reed, M. (2011). Flicker evaluation of the SeaGen tidal power plant. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy,2(4), 414–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yi, J. H., Oh, S. H., Park, J. S., Lee, K. S., & Lee, S. Y. (2013). Flow–turbine interaction CFD analysis for performance evaluation of vertical axis tidal current turbines (I). Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology,27(3), 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou, Z., Scuiller, F., Charpentier, J. F., Benbouzid, M. E. H., & Tang, T. (2013). Power smoothing control in a grid-connected marine current turbine system for compensating swell effect. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy,4(3), 816–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.R&D CenterHyundai ElevatorSeongnam-siRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringBusanRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Electric Motor Research CenterKorea Electrotechnology Research InstituteChangwon-siRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations