“I Think I Was Losing the Forest for the Trees”: Evaluation of an Internal Medicine Residency Quality Improvement Curriculum
- 7 Downloads
Quality improvement (QI) training during residency may not be adequately preparing physicians for achieving Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education goals and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Triple Aim. The purpose of this evaluation was to identify residents’ perceptions and impact of their QI curriculum.
We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of an active-learning QI curriculum for internal medicine residents at one academic medical center. Data from 2017 to 2018 included a focus group, pre-post survey, project data, and curricular materials. Results were categorized using Kirkpatrick’s model of evaluation.
All second-year internal medicine residents completed the curriculum (N = 14). Residents were satisfied with the structure and perceived accomplishment with the curriculum, however were dissatisfied by the impact of inconsistent attendance due to clinical conflicts. Their confidence in QI increased; however, they reported difficulty retaining knowledge and skills. Survey scores related to usefulness and anticipated application of QI were unchanged from baseline.
This applied QI curriculum appeared to improve short-term learning. However, the curriculum did not promote long-term understanding of QI. Finding ways to promote skills and retention beyond the curriculum requires further study.
KeywordsCurriculum Education Medical Graduate/standards Internship and Residency Quality Improvement Quality of Health Care
The authors wish to thank Kathryn N. Huggett, Ph.D., Director of The Teaching Academy at the Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont for her assistance in facilitating the focus group session with the residents.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants
The evaluation was reviewed by the University of Vermont Committees on Human Research under a determination of not research (e.g. quality assurance, educational evaluation).
Physician residents were informed that their participation in the focus group and surveys was voluntary and that their responses may be used in a manuscript. There was no formal informed consent document, as this evaluation was reviewed by the University of Vermont Committees on Human Research under a determination of not research (e.g., quality assurance, educational evaluation).
- 2.Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm : a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 3.ACGME. The Internal Medicine Milestone Project 2015. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/InternalMedicineMilestones.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2019.
- 9.Kirkpatrick JD, Kirkpatrick WK. Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Alexandria: ATD Press; 2016.Google Scholar
- 11.Langley GJ. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.Google Scholar
- 13.Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research. 5th edition. Ed. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, California; 2015.Google Scholar
- 14.Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999.Google Scholar