Advertisement

A Survey of Health Sciences Faculty Practices and Attitudes Regarding the Peer Feedback Component of Team-Based Learning

  • Sarah LerchenfeldtEmail author
  • Marty Eng
Original Research
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Peer feedback, an essential component of team-based learning (TBL), fosters accountability among team members. Effective utilization can be advantageous for both students and faculty, although there may be many implementation challenges. Our study objectives were to (1) identify current practices of peer feedback in TBL, (2) identify curricular assessment related to peer feedback, and (3) identify challenges with peer feedback in TBL.

Methods

A survey link was sent via medical and TBL web boards. The survey asked for both quantitative and qualitative information regarding the peer feedback process. Quantitative results were analyzed using SPSS®. NVivo® was used to identify and code themes in open-ended responses. Both investigators reviewed and agreed upon themes.

Results

Sixty-one TBL users in health professions completed the survey. Multiple health professions were represented with medicine and pharmacy being the most common. Information on current practices showed a wide variety of implementation. Curricular alignment was common. Time and training were the most common challenges and difficulties.

Conclusions

Meaningful feedback should be considered an important curricular outcome. Specific learning objectives and appropriate assessment strategies should be developed to meet the mission of the program. Students must receive guidance from faculty members on how to improve their skills in providing effective feedback. Overall, faculty saw peer evaluation as valuable. However, the time commitment, lack of student training, and student attitudes make implementation difficult. Future research should focus on best practices to streamline the TBL feedback process and on student training regarding how to provide effective feedback.

Keywords

Team-based learning Peer feedback Peer evaluation Peer assessment Health education 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The Institutional Review Boards (IRB) at Cedarville University and Oakland University determined this project was exempt from IRB review according to federal regulations.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was included at beginning of the survey.

References

  1. 1.
    Michaelsen LK, Sweet M. The essential elements of team-based learning. In: Michaelsen LK, Sweet M, Parmelee DX, editors. Team-based learning: small-group learning’s next big step. New directions for teaching and learning, No 116. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2008. p. 7–28.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haidet P, Levine RE, Parmelee DX. Perspective: guidelines for reporting team-based learning in the medical and health sciences education literature. Acad Med. 2012;87(3):292–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cestone CM, Levine RE, Lane DR. Peer assessment and evaluation of team-based learning. In: Michaelsen LK, Sweet M, Parmelee DX, editors. Team-based learning: small-group learning’s next big step. New directions for teaching and learning, No 116. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2008. p. 69–78.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):387–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nofziger AC, Naumburg EH, Davis BJ, Mooney CJ, Epstein RM. Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: a qualitative study. Acad Med. 2010;85(1):140–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Duzer E, McMartin F. Methods to improve the validity and sensitivity of a self/peer assessment instrument. IEEE Trans Educ. 2000;43(2):153–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cushing A, Abbott S, Lothian D, Hall A, Westwood OM. Peer feedback as an aid to learning—what do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now! Med Teach. 2011;33:105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arnold L, Shue CK, Kalishman S, Prislin M, Pohl C, Pohl H, et al. Can there be a single system for peer assessment of professionalism among medical students? A multi-institutional study. Acad Med. 2007;82:578–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farland MZ, Sicat BL, Franks AS, Pater KS, Medina MS, Persky AM. Best practices for implementing team-based learning in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(8):177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ashenafi MM. Peer-assessment in higher education—twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward. Assess Eval High Educ. 2017;42(2):226–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burgess AW, McGregor DM, Mellis CM. Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2014;89(4):678–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Topping K. Peer assessment. Theory Pract. 2009;48:20–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chatterjee D, Corral J. How to write well-defined learning objectives. J Educ Perioper Med. 2017;19(4):1–4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Michaelsen LK, Schultheiss EE. Making feedback helpful. J Manag Educ. 1989;13:109–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44:101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murdoch-Eaton D, Sargeant J. Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students’ perceptions about feedback. Med Educ. 2012;46(7):711–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brukner H. Giving effective feedback to medical students: a workshop for faculty and house staff. Med Teach. 1999;21(2):161–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schulz B. The importance of soft skills: education beyond academic knowledge. J Lang Commun. 2008;2(1):146–54.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gonzalez MA, Abu Kasim NH, Naimie Z. Soft skills and dental education. Eur J Dent Educ. 2013;17:73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duggan A, Street RL Jr. Interpersonal communication in health and illness. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2015. p. 243–68.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kenny NP, Mann KV, MacLeod H. Role modeling in physicians’ professional formation: reconsidering an essential but untapped educational strategy. Acad Med. 2003;78:1203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Medical Science Educators 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foundational Medical StudiesOakland University William Beaumont School of MedicineRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of PharmacyCedarville UniversityCedarvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations