Advertisement

Medical Science Educator

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 515–524 | Cite as

Large Group Basic Science Tutorials Reduce the Stigma Surrounding Academic Assistance in the Medical School Setting

  • Marjorie E. Bateman
  • R. Benson Jones
  • Erik A. Green
  • Mira M. John
  • Bradford Hilson
  • Jordan Wlodarczyk
  • Norman Kreisman
  • Catherine Jones
  • Chayan Chakraborti
Original Research
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Struggling students are less likely to seek academic assistance and may start at a lower level of comfort with asking for help. Peer and near-peer tutoring programs may reduce the stigma of asking for academic assistance, but studies of the efficacy of such interventions are lacking in the literature. A near-peer tutoring elective called “Upperclassmen Tutoring Underclassmen in Basic sciences And Test-taking” (UpTUBAT) was developed to provide academic support to struggling first and second year medical students. Fourth year medical students were trained in effective tutoring practices through online modules, activities, standardized learner experiences, and faculty-led discussions. Tutors then designed and hosted weekly tutoring sessions. An average of 31 learners attended each session, and 188 total medical students received tutoring. The effects of the tutoring sessions were assessed through pre- and post-tutoring surveys and learner grades. Positive tutoring session themes included identification of relevant information, active engagement, concept clarification, opportunity for review, and diversity of approaches. Attendance of more than half of the sessions increased learners’ self-reported comfort (on a 5-point Likert scale) with asking for help from an upperclassman (4.5 versus 3.2, p = 0.01) or from a professor (4.3 versus 3.1, p = 0.01). More students who were struggling sought tutoring through these sessions, and this intervention helped to maintain learner grades at the same level as the students not receiving tutoring. This study establishes an effective method of training tutors to host large group tutorials in the basic sciences which can lead to development of a cohesive learning community across medical school classes. Near-peer tutoring may be an effective approach to improve learner comfort with seeking academic assistance in the medical school setting.

Keywords

Undergraduate medical education Teaching methods Academic support Large group tutorials Basic science 

Notes

Funding Information

An institutional grant from the Office of Medical Education provided funding for access to TutorLingo©, a web portal with online tutor training modules and activities.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This study was granted IRB exemption by the Tulane University Institutional Review Board and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Burgess A, McGregor D, Mellis C. Medical students as peer tutors: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:115.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Protty MB, Mann J, Mohammed MA, Holder R, Wiskin C. Students as teachers: the impact of a near-peer-led didactic teaching model on tutee confidence. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):968.  https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.786814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burgess A, Dornan T, Clarke AJ, Menezes A, Mellis C. Peer tutoring in a medical school: perceptions of tutors and tutees. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:85.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0589-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khaw C, Raw L. The outcomes and acceptability of near-peer teaching among medical students in clinical skills. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:188–94.  https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5749.7b8b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bulte C, Betts A, Garner K, Durning S. Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):583–90.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701583824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buckley S, Zamora J. Effects of participation in a cross year peer tutoring programme in clinical examination skills on volunteer tutors’ skills and attitudes towards teachers and teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:20.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-7-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sobral D. Cross-year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: conditions and outcomes for student tutors. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1064–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yates J. When did they leave, and why? A retrospective case study of attrition on the Nottingham undergraduate medical course. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:43.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Neill L, Wallstedt B, Eika B, Hartvigsen J. Factors associated with dropout in medical education: a literature review. Med Educ. 2011;45(5):440–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ryan AM, Pintrich PR, Midgley C. Avoiding seeking help in the classroom: who and why? Educ Psychol Rev. 2001;13(2):93–114.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009013420053. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shin HI, Jeon WT. “I’m not happy, but I don’t care”: help-seeking behavior, academic difficulties, and happiness. Korean J Med Educ. 2011;23(1):7–14.  https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2011.23.1.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cleland J, Arnold R, Chesser A. Failing finals is often a surprise for the student but not the teacher: identifying difficulties and supporting students with academic difficulties. Med Teach. 2005;27(6):504–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500156269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Menezes A, Burgess A, Clarke AJ, Mellis C. Peer-assisted learning in medical school: tutees’ perspective. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016;7:31–8.  https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s94570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MacDonald RB. The master tutor: a guidebook for more effective tutoring. Williamsville: Cambridge Stratford Study Skills Institute; 1994.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steinert Y. Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Med Educ. 2004;38(3):286–93.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01772.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Groves M, Régo P, O’Rourke P. Tutoring in problem-based learning medical curricula: the influence of tutor background and style on effectiveness. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5(1):20.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jackson TA, Evans DJ. Can medical students teach? A near-peer-led teaching program for year 1 students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2012;36(3):192–6.  https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00035.2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sammaraiee Y, Mistry R, Lim J, Wittner L, Deepak S, Lim G. Peer-assisted learning: filling the gaps in basic science education for preclinical medical students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016;40(3):297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jayakumar N, Srirathan D, Shah R, Jakubowska A, Clarke A, Annan D, et al. Which peer teaching methods do medical students prefer? Educ Health (Abingdon, England). 2016;29(2):142–7.  https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.188764. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morgan K, Northey E, Khalil M. The effect of near-peer tutoring on medical students’ performance in anatomical and physiological sciences. Clin Anat. 2017;30(7):922–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hong WH, Vadivelu J, Daniel EGS, Sim JH. Thinking about thinking: changes in first-year medical students’ metacognition and its relation to performance. Med Educ Online. 2015;20:27561.  https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.27561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    West C, Sadoski M. Do study strategies predict academic performance in medical school? Med Educ. 2011;45(7):696–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, APN T. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ. 2012;46(7):678–88.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04284.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vrugt A, Oort FJ. Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: pathways to achievement. Metacogn Learn. 2008;3(2):123–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Artino ARJ, Hemmer PA, Durning SJ. Using self-regulated learning theory to understand the beliefs, emotions, and behaviors of struggling medical students. Acad Med. 2011;86(10):S35–S8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a603d. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karabenick SA, Knapp JR. Help seeking and the need for academic assistance. J Educ Psychol. 1988;80(3):406–8.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kibble JD. A peer-led supplemental tutorial project for medical physiology: implementation in a large class. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009;33(2):111–4.  https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.90212.2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Soriano RP, Blatt B, Coplit L, CichoskiKelly E, Kosowicz L, Newman L, et al. Teaching medical students how to teach: a national survey of students-as-teachers programs in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1725–31.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f53273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Medical Science Educators 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marjorie E. Bateman
    • 1
  • R. Benson Jones
    • 1
  • Erik A. Green
    • 1
  • Mira M. John
    • 1
  • Bradford Hilson
    • 1
  • Jordan Wlodarczyk
    • 1
  • Norman Kreisman
    • 2
  • Catherine Jones
    • 1
  • Chayan Chakraborti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MedicineTulane University School of Medicine, Internal Medicine Residency ProgramNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyTulane University School of MedicineNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations