Students’ Perception of Formative Assessment as an Instructional Tool in Medical Education
In self-directed learning environments, students must monitor and assess their learning progress themselves. Formative assessments play a central role as instructional tools to train students in these self-assessment skills. Key to the effectiveness of a formative assessment as a training instrument is the degree of student involvement in the design and implementation of the formative assessment used to train them. Five characteristics are essential to secure a sufficient level of student involvement: (1) congruence (i.e., the tasks of a formative assessment must reflect the instructional content), (2) authenticity (i.e., the tasks of a formative assessment should be related to students’ background and study context), (3) consultation (i.e., students should have a say in how their answers are evaluated based on which criteria), (4) transparency (i.e., no “mystery items”—the wording of the items must clearly addresses the targeted content), and (5) accommodation (i.e., all students should have the same chance to complete the items of a formative assessment). These five characteristics of student involvement were used to evaluate the quality of formative assessments that are employed to train undergraduates in a medical school in self-assessment skills. Different from extant approaches that typically rely on instructors’ judgments to infer the degree of student involvement, this study uses a paradigm in higher educational research asking students directly about their perceptions of an instructional tool. Thus, here, students had to rate their level of involvement in the design and implementation of the formative assessments used to train them. A total of 140 medical students participated in the study. Multivariate statistical methods were used to analyze the data. The majority of medical students appreciate the use of formative assessments to teach them self-directed learning skills; but the results also show that there is still room for increasing student involvement—especially, for minority students.
KeywordsFormative assessment in self-directed learning Evaluation Attitude survey Self-assessment Teacher education
The authors would like to thank Joanne Willey, Judith M. Brenner, and Jeffrey B. Bird for their helpful comments and useful suggestions regarding an earlier draft of the evaluation questionnaire.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.
The institutional review board of Hofstra University determined this study to be exempt.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. Washington (DC): Association of American Medical Colleges (US); 2017. 35 p. Joint publication of the American Medical Association.Google Scholar
- 12.Chappuis S, Stiggins RJ. Classroom assessment for learning. Educ Leadersh. 2003;60:40–3.Google Scholar
- 13.Dolin J, Black P, Harlen W, Tiberghien A. Exploring relations between formative and summative assessment. In: Dolin J, Evans R, editors. Transforming assessment. Contributions from science education research. Cham: Springer; 2018.Google Scholar
- 15.Cizek GJ. An introduction to formative assessment: history, characteristics, and challenges. In: Andrade H, Cizek G, editors. Handbook of formative assessment. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2010. p. 3–17.Google Scholar
- 17.Cavanagh RF, Waldrip BG, Romanoski JT, Fisher DL, Dorman JP. Measuring student perceptions of classroom assessment. Paper presented at: Australian Association for Research in education; November 24, 2005; Parramatta, Australia.Google Scholar
- 23.Brookhart SM, Bronowicz DL. I don’t like writing: it makes my fingers hurt: students talk about their classroom assessments. Assess Educ Princ Pol Pract. 2003;10:221–42.Google Scholar
- 24.McMillan JA. Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2000;7(8):89–103.Google Scholar
- 25.Alkharusi H. Development and datametric properties of a scale measuring students’ perceptions of the classroom assessment environment. Int J Instr. 2001;4:105–20.Google Scholar
- 28.Fakeye DO. Secondary school teachers’ and students’ attitude towards formative assessment and corrective feedback in English language in Ibadan Metroplis. IJESS. 2016;6(2):141–7.Google Scholar
- 30.Stiggins RJ. Student-involved classroom assessment. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice Hall; 2001.Google Scholar
- 32.Sudman S, Bradburn N, Schwarz N. Thinking about answers: the application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996.Google Scholar
- 33.Bradburn NM, Sudman S, Wansink B. Asking questions: the definitive guide to questionnaire design. For market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires (2nd, revised edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2004.Google Scholar
- 35.Gulikers JT, Bastiaens TJ, Kirschner PA, Kester L. Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: student and teacher perceptions of assessment authenticity. J Vocat Educ Train. 2008;60(4):401–12.Google Scholar
- 36.Maxwell J. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc; 2005.Google Scholar