Nutrition as Medicine, Food Sensitivities, and Chronic Disease: a Mini Curriculum Shaped by Transformative Learning Theory
- 78 Downloads
Nutrition-related diseases are preventable twenty-first-century health problems. Students report being underprepared for nutritional therapeutics. We developed a mini, spiral curriculum shaped by transformative learning theory and centered on nutrition as medicine, food sensitivities, and chronic disease to kick-start a shift in cognition, attitudes, and skills. Seven demographically representative students participated in the 3-week curriculum. Visual, textual, and verbal data were captured and analyzed qualitatively. We found the curriculum evoked paradigm transformation that persisted 6 months later and facilitated opportunities for our cohort to self-identify learning gaps and consider how they related to their current and future goals for patient care.
KeywordsChronic disease Food sensitivities Intestinal permeability Lifestyle medicine Nutrition Medical students
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Death and mortality. 2018 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm Accessed 15 Feb 2018.
- 3.Levine BS, Wigren MM, Chapman DS, Kerner JF, Bergman RL, Rivlin RS. A national survey of attitudes and practices of primary-care physicians relating to nutrition: strategies for enhancing the use of clinical nutrition in medical practice. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;57:115–119.Google Scholar
- 12.Nuno NB, Heuberger R. Nutrigenomic associations with cardiovascular disease. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2014;15:217–25.Google Scholar
- 17.McGonigal K. Teaching for transformation: from learning theory to teaching strategies. Center for Teaching and Learning: Stanford University. 2005. https://tomprof.stanford.edu/posting/759 Accessed 6 Jul 2018.
- 18.Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999;34:1189–208.Google Scholar
- 19.Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, Airasian PW, Cruikshank KA, Mayer RE, Pintrich PR, Raths J, Wittrock MC. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman; 2001.Google Scholar
- 20.Gulmans, J. Mapping for the constructivistic acquisition of concepts? In Kommers P. Cognitive support for learning. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004. pp. 31–45.Google Scholar
- 21.Nesbit JC, Adesope OO. Concept maps for learning. Learning through visual displays, Charlotte: Information Age Publishing; 2013. pp. 303–328.Google Scholar