Veterinary Students and Faculty Partner in Developing a Virtual Three-Dimensional (3D) Interactive Touch Screen Canine Anatomy Table
- 6 Downloads
As educational technology advances, it is imperative that universities responsibly and appropriately adapt new approaches to enhance teaching and learning. Over a 6-month period, veterinary students at Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine (RUSVM) spearheaded the improvement of a proprietary prototype virtual interactive three-dimensional (3D), touch screen, canine anatomy table (APEX). Eight veterinary students with a grade of 80% or higher in their anatomy courses were hired as research assistants to identify and characterize 306 virtual anatomical structures. Descriptive statistics were used to assess students’ (1) accuracy in reviewing assigned anatomical structures, and (2) perceptions surrounding the use of APEX as an educational anatomical tool. The overall accuracy rating was 3.73 on a 4-point scale, and students reported their experience as enjoyable (median 4 on a 5-point Likert scale) and beneficial to their knowledge of veterinary anatomy (median 4). In addition, 29 RUSVM faculty were surveyed on both the prototype APEX table as well as the student-improved version. Faculty agreement with utilization of APEX in RUSVM curriculum increased from Likert mean = 2.0 to a mean of 3.9 (p = < 0.001) between the two versions. Study results support the use of veterinary students to critically assess the development of anatomical educational tools for veterinary anatomy. Furthermore, students and faculty supported acceptance of technology in teaching and learning veterinary anatomy, and reported enjoyment and benefit of its use.
KeywordsVeterinary anatomy education Computer assisted learning Gross anatomy Virtual anatomy Educational methods
APEX table development was facilitated by Gear Learning development studio.
Funding for this project was provided by an intramural grant from Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine Center-4, Research and Innovation in Veterinary and Medical Education.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All participants were asked to read and sign an informed consent form prior to the start of the study. Standards, guidelines, and approval for the use of student cohorts relative to this research were administered by the RUSVM institutional review board (IRB).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This manuscript does not contain images, tables or figures which are under copyright. All authors have read and accept responsibility for this manuscript.
- 6.Abdelhamid TM. The multidimensional learning model: A novel cognitive psychologybased model for computer assisted instruction in order to improve learning in medical students. Medical Education Online. 1999;4(1):4302.Google Scholar
- 8.Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(2):83–93.Google Scholar
- 17.Al-Mohrej OA, Al-Ayedh NK, Masuadi EM, Al-Kenani NS. Learning methods and strategies of anatomy among medical students in two different Institutions in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Medical Teacher. 2017;39(sup1):S15–S21.Google Scholar
- 23.Brophy J. Motivating students to learn. Ch 1. Introduction to Student Motivation. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013. p. 1–26.Google Scholar
- 26.Berg D, Raugi G, Gladstone H, Berkley J, Weghorst S, Ganter M, et al. Virtual reality simulators for dermatologic surgery: measuring their validity as a teaching tool. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(4):370–4.Google Scholar
- 28.Balcombe J. Student/teacher conflict regarding animal dissection. Am Biol Teach. 1997;59(1):22–25.Google Scholar
- 29.Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Textbook of veterinary anatomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2009.Google Scholar
- 30.Evans HE, De Lahunta A. Guide to the dissection of the dog. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.Google Scholar
- 32.Medhub. E*Value http://www.medhub.com/evalue/evalue-product/. Accessed 19 July 2017.
- 39.Frick CMRTW, Reigeluth CM. Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. Instructional-design theories and models, 1999;2.Google Scholar