Was Aristotle the ‘father’ of the epigenesis doctrine?

Original Paper
  • 22 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Sketches of a Conceptual History of Epigenesis

Abstract

Was Aristotle the ‘father’ and founder of the epigenesis doctrine? Historically, I will argue, this question must be answered with ‘no’. Aristotle did not initiate and had no access to a debate that described itself in terms of ‘epigenesis’ and ‘preformation’, and thus cannot be considered the ‘father’ or founder of the epigenesis-preformation controversy in a literal sense. But many ancient accounts of reproduction and embryological development contain analogies to what early modern scientist called ‘epigenesis’ and ‘preformation’, and, in this analogous sense, Aristotle can be considered a precursor of the epigenesis-preformation controversy. But is Aristotle’s position actually epigenetic (in this analogous sense), as most of the traditional interpreters hold, or preformationist, as some of the recent scholars believe? I will argue against the one-sidedness of both readings that Aristotle’s account of reproduction and heredity contains mainly epigenetic, but also a few preformationist characteristics. Whereas, for instance, Aristotle’s idea of a successive development of the embryo’s parts is doubtlessly epigenetic, Aristotle’s idea that the development of the embryo is an actualization and enlargement of potential parts, which are simultaneously present in the semen, can be considered a preformationist feature.

Keywords

Aristotle Biology Embryology Epigenesis Preformation 

References

Aristotle’s writings in Greek edition

  1. Aristotle. (1960). Aristotelis Opera. Ex recensione Immanuelis Bekkeri. Edidit Academia Regia Borussica. Berolini: Walter de Gruyter et Socios, 5 vols.Google Scholar

Aristotle’s writings in English translations

  1. [DA] [PN] [DR] Aristotle. (1935). On the soul (De anima). Small writings on nature (Parva naturalia). On breath (De respiratione) (W. S. Hett, Ed. and Trans.). London/Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. [GA] Aristotle. (1984). Generation of animals (De generatione animalium) (A. L. Peck, Ed. and Trans.). London/Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1942); Aristotle. Generation of animals. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. 1, pp. 1111–1218). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. [Met.] Aristotle. (1933). Metaphysics (Metaphysica) (H. Tredennick, Ed. and Trans.). London/Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2 vols.Google Scholar
  4. [Phys.] Aristotle. (1957/1934). Physics (Physica) (P. H. Wicksteed, F. M. Cornford, Ed. and Trans.). London/Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2 vols.Google Scholar
  1. Aeschylus (458 BC). Eumenides. In A. H. Sommerstein (Ed. and Trans.), Oresteia. AgamemnonLibation-BearersEumenides (pp. 353–485). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2008).Google Scholar
  2. Balme, D. (1985). Aristotle’s De partibus animalium I and De generatione animalium I (with passages from II 1–3) (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on woman. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blundell, S. (1995). Women in ancient Greece. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Coles, A. (1995). Biomedical models of reproduction in the fifth century BC and Aristotle’s Generation of animals. Phronesis, 40(1), 48–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connell, S. (2016). Aristotle on female animals. A study of the Generation of animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diels, H., & Kranz, W. (2004). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. (Reprint 6th ed.). Zürich: Weidmann. [DK]Google Scholar
  8. Elsthain, J. B. (1981). Public man, private woman. Oxford: Robertson.Google Scholar
  9. Euripides (c. 431 BC). Medea. In D. Kovacs (Ed. and Trans.), Euripides I. CyclopsAlcestisMedea (pp. 276–413). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2001).Google Scholar
  10. Föllinger, S. (1996). Differenz und Gleichheit. Das Geschlechterverhältnis in der Sicht griechischer Philosophen des 4. bis 1. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Goy, I. (2017). Kants Theorie der Biologie (pp. 278–385). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey, W. (1651). On animal generation. In The works of William Harvey (R. Willis Trans.) (pp. 169–518). New York: Johnson (1965).Google Scholar
  13. Hartsoeker, N. (1694). Essay de dioptrique. Paris: Anisson. Repr. Breinigsville: Kessinger (2010).Google Scholar
  14. Henry, D. (2005). Embryological models in ancient philosophy. Phronesis, 50(1), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kosman, A. (2010). Male and female in Aristotle’s Generation of animals. In J. Lennox & R. Bolton (Eds.), Being, nature, and life in Aristotle (pp. 147–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lennox, J. (2006). The comparative study of animal development: William Harvey’s Aristotelianism. In J. E. H. Smith (Ed.), The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy (pp. 21–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lesky, E. (1950). Die Zeugungs- und Vererbungslehren der Antike und ihr Nachwirken. In Abhandlungen der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse Jahrgang 1950 (19) (pp. 1225–1425). Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  18. Mayhew, R. (2004). The female in Aristotle’s biology: Reason or rationalization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morsink, J. (1982). Aristotle on the generation of animals: A philosophical study. Lanham/London: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  20. Needham, J. (1959). A history of embryology (pp. 18–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Plato. (c. 360 BC). Timaios. In G. Eigler (Ed.), Platon. Werke in acht Bänden (Vol. 7, pp. 1–209). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (2001).Google Scholar
  22. Peck, A. L. (1942). Introduction. In Aristotle. Generation of animals (A. L. Peck, Trans.) (pp. vii–lxxix). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Preus, A. (1975). Science and philosophy in Aristotle’s biological works (pp. 48–107). Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
  24. Preus, A. (2015). Historical dictionary of ancient Greek philosophy (2nd ed.). Lanham/Boulder/New York/London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität Tübingen, Philosophisches SeminarTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations