Advertisement

Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 869–878 | Cite as

The Utility of a Function-Based Approach to Intimate Partner Violence and Gender Bias in Family Courts

  • Heidi J. EilersEmail author
Special Section: Diversity and Inclusion

Abstract

The prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) is alarmingly high. Leaving an abusive relationship is only part of the solution, especially for survivors who share children with a violent partner. The IPV survivor has to navigate the family court system in order to obtain protection orders and custody arrangements. The decisions made by judges in family courts are influenced by gender-biased theories that rely on myths about women, intimate domestic violence, and the effects of violence and abuse on children. This paper will describe current issues in family court and possible contributions that behavior analysts can provide.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies done with human participants performed by the author.

References

  1. Abbot, B. B., & Badia, P. (1984). Preference for signaled over unsignaled shock schedules: Ruling out asymmetry and response fixation as factors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 45–52.Google Scholar
  2. Abrams, R., & Greaney, J. (1989). Report of the gender bias study of the Supreme Judicial Court [of Massachusetts]. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.Google Scholar
  3. Azrin, N. H., Hutchinson, R. R., & Hake, D. F. (1967). Attack, avoidance, and escape reactions to aversive shock. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 131–148.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  5. Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., . . . Stevens, M. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf.
  6. Bond, R. (2007). The lingering debate over the parental alienation syndrome phenomenon. Journal of Child Custody, 4(1–2), 37–54.  https://doi.org/10.1300/j190v04n01_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonem, M., Stanley-Kime, K. L., & Corbin, M. (2008). A behavioral approach to understanding domestic violence: A functional assessment based on batterer-identified contingencies. The Journal of Behavior Analysis of Offender and Victim Treatment and Prevention, 1(2), 209–221.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bruch, C. S. (2001). Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: Getting it wrong in child custody cases. Family Law Quarterly, 35(3), 527–552.Google Scholar
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Infographic based on data from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 state report. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-infographic-2016.pdf.
  11. Cherek, D. R., & Pickens, R. (1970). Schedule-induced aggression as a function of fixed-ratio value. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 309–311.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Dallam, S. J. (1999). Parental alienation syndrome: Is it scientific? In E. S. Charles & L. Crook (Eds.), Expose: The failure of family courts to protect children from abuse in custody disputes. Our Children Our Children Charitable Foundation: Los Gatos, CA Retrieved from http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/3.html.Google Scholar
  13. Dallam, S. J., & Silberg, J. L. (2006). Myths that place children at risk during custody disputes. Sexual Assault Report, 9(3), 33–47.Google Scholar
  14. Dallam, S. J., & Silberg, J. L. (2016). Recommended treatments for “parental alienation syndrome” (PAS) may cause children foreseeable and lasting psychological harm. Journal of Child Custody, 13(2–3), 134–114.Google Scholar
  15. Danforth, G., & Welling, B. (Eds.). (1996). Achieving equal justice for women and men in the California courts: Final report. Judicial Council of California Advisory Committee on Gender Bias in the Courts.Google Scholar
  16. Dore, M. K. (2004). The “friendly parent” concept: A flawed factor for child custody. Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, 6, 41–56.Google Scholar
  17. Dragiewicz, M. (2010). Gender bias in the courts: Implications for battered mothers and their children. In M. Hannah & B. Goldstein (Eds.), Domestic violence, abuse, and child custody: Legal strategies and policy issues (§§ 5.1–5.18). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Dutton, D. G., & Bodnarchuk, M. (2005). Through a psychological lens: Personality disorder and spouse assault. In D. Loseke, R. Gelles, & M. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (2nd ed., pp. 5–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Edleson, J. L. (1999). Children’s witnessing of adult domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 839–870.Google Scholar
  20. Emery, R. E., Otto, R. K., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2005). A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: Limited science and a flawed system. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(1), 1–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fink, P. J. (2010). Parental alienation syndrome. In M. Hannah & B. Goldstein (Eds.), Domestic violence, abuse, and child custody: Legal strategies and policy issues (§§ 12.1–12.8). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Flory, R., Smith, E. L. P., & Ellis, B. B. (1977). The effects of two response-elimination procedures on reinforced and induced aggression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 5–15.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Freyd, J. J. (1997). Violations of power, adaptive blindness, and betrayal trauma theory. Feminism and Psychology, 7, 22–32.Google Scholar
  24. Gonzalez, A. M., & Reichman, L. M. (2005). Representing children in civil cases involving domestic violence. Family Law Quarterly, 39(1), 197–220.Google Scholar
  25. Goodmark, L. (2011). State, national, and international legal initiatives to address violence against women. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Gould, E. R., Tarbox, J., & Coyne, L. (2018). Evaluating the effects of acceptance and commitment training on the overt behavior of parents of children with autism. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 7, 81–88.Google Scholar
  27. Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Edelson, J. L. (2002). Domestic violence in the lives of children: The future of research, intervention and social policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  28. Hardesty, J. L., & Chung, G. H. (2006). Intimate partner violence, parental divorce, and child custody: Directions for intervention and future research. Family Relations, 55(2), 200.Google Scholar
  29. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hogan, L. E., Baron, A., & Kaufman, A. (1968). Temporal variables in the acquisition of human free-operant avoidance of “time out.”. Psychonomic Science, 10, 57–58.Google Scholar
  31. Holz, W. C., & Azrin, N. H. (1961). Discriminative properties of punishment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 225–232.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutchinson, R. R., Azrin, N. H., & Hunt, G. M. (1968). Attack produced by intermittent reinforcement of a concurrent operant response. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 489–495.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Jaffe, P. G., & Crooks, C. V. (2007). Assessing the best interests of the children. In J. L. Edleson & O. J. Williams (Eds.), Parenting by men who batter: New directions for assessment and intervention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kellum, K. K., Hayes, L. J., & Ghezzi, P. M. (2000). A preliminary analysis of responding by abused partners. Paper presented at the 19th annual convention for the California Association for Behavior Analysis, Redondo Beach, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Kitzmann, K. M., Gaylord, N. K., Holt, A. R., & Kenny, E. D. (2003). Child witnesses to domestic violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 339–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Knutson, J. F. (1970). Aggression during the fixed-ratio and extinction components of a multiple schedule of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 221–231.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Landaburu, H., & Ghezzi, P. M. (2003). Intimate domestic violence: A behavior analytic perspective. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Convention of the California Association for Behavior Analysis, Newport Beach, CA.Google Scholar
  38. Leaf, R. C. (1965). Acquisition of Sidman avoidance responding as a function of S-S interval. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 59, 298–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Liss, M. B., & Stahly, G. B. (1993). Domestic violence and child custody. In M. Hansen & M. Harway (Eds.), Battering and family therapy: A feminist perspective (pp. 175–187). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Meier, J. S. (2013). Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: A research review. Retrieved on September 11, 2017, from http://www.vawnet.org.
  41. Meier, J. S., & Dickson, S. (2017). Mapping gender: Shedding empirical light on family courts’ treatment of cases involving abuse and alienation. Law & Inequality, 35, 310–334.Google Scholar
  42. Milchman, M. S. (2017). Misogynistic cultural argument in parental alienation versus child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Child Custody, 14(4), 211–233.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2017.1416722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers, D. L. (1995). Eliminating the battering of women by men: Some considerations for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 493–507.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Donohue, W., Benuto, L. T., & Bennett, N. (2016). Examining the validity of parental alienation syndrome. Journal of Child Custody, 13, 113–125.Google Scholar
  45. Powell, D. A., Francis, M. J., Francis, J., & Schneiderman, N. (1972). Shock-induced aggression as a function of prior experience with avoidance, fighting, or unavoidable shock. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 323–332.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Reynolds, G. S., Catania, A. C., & Skinner, B. F. (1963). Conditioned and unconditioned aggression in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 73–74.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Rotgers, F., & Barrett, D. (1996). Daubert v. Merrell Dow and expert testimony by clinical psychologists: Implications and recommendations for practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27(5), 467–474.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.27.5.467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saunders, D. G. (2007). Child custody and visitation decisions in domestic violence cases: Legal trends, risk factors, and safety concerns. Minneapolis, MN: National Resource Center on Domestic Violence Retrieved from http://new.vawnet.org/category/Main_Doc.php?docid=1134.Google Scholar
  49. Saunders, D., Faller, K., & Tolman, R. (2012). Custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic abuse allegations, 2009–2010 [United States]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.  https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30962.v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sidman, M. (1966). Avoidance behavior. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts: New York, NY.Google Scholar
  51. Sidman, M. (2000). Coercion and its fallout (Rev. ed.). Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  52. Sidman, M., & Boren, J. J. (1957). The relative aversiveness of warning signal and shock in an avoidance situation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 339–344.Google Scholar
  53. Spinazzola, J., Ford, J. D., Zucker, M., van der Kolk, B. A., Silva, S., Smith, S. F., et al. (2005). Survey evaluates complex trauma exposure, outcome, and intervention among children and adolescents. Psychiatric Annals, 35, 433–439.Google Scholar
  54. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Report sponsored by the National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  55. Trocme, N., & Bala, N. (2005). False allegations of abuse and neglect when parents separate. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29(12), 1333–1345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ulrich, R. E., Stachnik, T. J., Brierton, G. R., & Mabry, J. H. (1966). Fighting and avoidance in response to aversive stimulation. Behavior, 26, 124–129.Google Scholar
  57. Walker, L. E., & Shapiro, D. L. (2010). Parental alienation disorder: Why label children with a mental diagnosis? Journal of Child Custody, 7, 266–286.Google Scholar
  58. Wolfe, D. A., Crooks, V. L., McIntyre-Smith, A., & Jaffe, P. G. (2004). The effects of children’s exposure to domestic violence: A meta-analysis and critique. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 171–187.Google Scholar
  59. World Health Organization. (2012).Google Scholar
  60. Zorza, J. (1992). Friendly parent provision in custody determination. Clearinghouse Review, 26(8), 924.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Behavior AnalysisChicago School of Professional PsychologySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations