Advertisement

Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 777–781 | Cite as

Language Preference of a Multilingual Individual With Disabilities Using a Speech Generating Device

  • Megan KunzeEmail author
  • Christine Drew
  • Wendy Machalicek
  • Jonathan Safer-Lichtenstein
  • Becky Crowe
Special Section: Diversity and Inclusion
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

Individuals with disabilities who are English learners (ELs) and communicate using speech generating devices (SGDs) may demonstrate a preference for instructional language and language output of their SGDs. The influence of interventionist language on the preference of SGD language output and frequency of mands was examined using an alternating-treatments design with an embedded concurrent-chain arrangement with a 10-year-old with Down syndrome whose heritage language was Spanish. Language preference assessment for ELs is recommended because heritage language may be preferred for children with disabilities who use SGDs.

Keywords

English learner Developmental disabilities Speech generating device Language preference 

Notes

Funding

This research was partially supported by Project Heightened Excellence in Autism Research and Training (HEART) OSEP Leadership Grant No. H325D150082 (principal investigator: Wendy Machalicek).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study and their parents/guardians.

References

  1. Aguilar, J. M., White, P. J., Fragale, C., & Chan, J. M. (2016). Preference for language of instruction of an English language learner with autism. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 19(3), 207–210.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2015.1044133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Attainment Company (2011). GoTalk NOW [Mobile AAC app]. Available from: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/gotalk-now/id454176457?mt=8.
  3. Bird, E. K. R., Cleave, P., Trudeau, N., Thordardottir, E., Sutton, A., & Thorpe, A. (2005). The language abilities of bilingual children with Down syndrome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(3), 187–199.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2005/019).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheatham, G. A., & Hart Barnett, J. E. (2017). Overcoming common misunderstandings about students with disabilities who are English language learners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(1), 58–63.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216644819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Fong, E. H., Catagnus, R. M., Brodhead, M. T., Quigley, S., & Field, S. (2016). Developing the cultural awareness skills of behavior analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(1), 84–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0111-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Klinger, J. K., Boelé, A., Linan-Thompson, S., & Rodriguez, D. (2014). Essential components of special education for English language learners with learning disabilities: Position statement of the Division for Learning. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29(3), 93–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). English language learners in public schools. U.S. In Department of Education. Common Core of Data: National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp.
  9. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Soto, G., & Yu, B. (2014). Considerations for the provision of services to bilingual children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 83–92.  https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.878751.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Education, Department of Special Education and Clinical SciencesUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations