Advertisement

Intersectional Feminism and Behavior Analysis

  • Kaylee A. DeFelice
  • James W. DillerEmail author
Special Section: Diversity and Inclusion

Abstract

This paper compares facets of behavior analysis and intersectional feminist theory. We begin by describing the history of issues related to gender and sexuality in behavior analysis. Then, we explain how the goals of feminism and applied behavior analysis are aligned, with a focus on intersectional feminism. Intersectional feminism examines the influence of interacting variables (e.g., race, gender, and sexuality) that affect one’s experiences and behaviors, rather than focusing on a single factor, such as gender. Pragmatic behaviorism and intersectionality have many parallels, and by exploring them, researchers can generate more comprehensive explanations of behavior. With prevalent gender, race, and sexual orientation biases in contemporary society, it may be important for behavior analysts to be able to recognize these contingencies that have been previously overlooked. Describing the conceptual commonalities between these disciplines may be a stride towards inclusivity and advancement of the goals of each discipline.

Keywords

Behavior analysis Behaviorism Gender  Intersectional feminism Sexuality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Clare Mehta and Laura Diller for their feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest associated with the publication of this manuscript, and all appropriate ethical standards have been upheld.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (1995). Report of the task force on the changing gender composition of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. (2006). Women in the American Psychological Association. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/pi/women/committee/wapa-2006.pdf.
  3. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow, D. H., & Agras, W. S. (1973). Fading to increase heterosexual responsiveness in homosexuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6(3), 355–366.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1973.6-355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB). (2016). Professional and ethical compliance code for behavior analysts. Retrieved from: https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/170706-compliance-code-english.pdf.
  6. Biglan, A. (2015). The Nurture Effect: how the science of human behavior can improve our lives and our world. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
  7. Callahan, E. J., & Leitenberg, H. (1973). Aversion therapy for sexual deviation: Contingent shock and covert sensitization. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 81(1), 60–73.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics, 1989 University of Chicago legal forum.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Embry, D. D. (2002). The good behavior game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5(4), 273–293.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102977107086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fong, E. H., Catagnus, R. M., Broadhead, M. T., Quigley, S., & Field, S. (2016). Developing the cultural awareness skills of behavior analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 84–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0111-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geller, E. S. (2014). Actively caring for people: Cultivating a culture of compassion. Newport:Make-a-Difference LLC.Google Scholar
  14. Haldemann, D. M. (1999). The pseudo-science of sexual orientation conversion therapy. Angles, 4(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  15. Heldke, L. (1987). John Dewey and Evelyn fox Keller: A shared epistemological tradition. Hypatia, 2(3), 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Irvine, J. J. (1986). Teacher–student interactions: Effects of student race, sex, and grade level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 14–21.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lattal, K. A., & Laipple, J. S. (2003). Pragmatism and behavior analysis. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory & philosophy. Boston, MA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, A., Curiel, H., Pritchard, J., & Poling, A. (2018). Participation of women in behavior analysis research: Some recent and relevant data. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11(2), 160–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0211-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maton, K. I., Kohout, J. L., Wicherski, M., Leary, G. E., & Vinokurov, A. (2006). Minority students of color and the psychology graduate pipeline: Disquieting and encouraging trends, 1989-2003. American Psychologist, 61(2), 117–131.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.2.117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGuire, R. J., & Vallance, M. (1964). Aversion therapy by electric shock: A simple technique. British Medical Journal, 1, 151–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McLay, L., Carnett, A., Tyler-Merrick, G., & van der Meer, L. (2015). A systematic review of interventions for inappropriate sexual behavior of children and adolescents with developmental disabilities. Review Journal Autism Development Disorder, 2, 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McSweeney, F. K., Donahoe, P., & Swindell, S. (2000). Women in applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 23(2), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moradi, B., & Grzanka, P. R. (2017). Using intersectionality responsibly: Toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(5), 500–513.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris, E. K. (1988). Contextualism: The worldview of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46(3), 289–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0956(88)90063-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morris, E. K. (1993). Mechanism and contextualism in behavior analysis: Just some observations. The Behavior Analyst, 16(2), 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nosik, M. R., Luke, M. M., & Carr, J. E. (2018). Representation of women in behavior analysis: An empirical analysis. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000118.
  29. Ostertag, P. A., & McNamara, J. R. (1991). 'Feminization' of psychology: The changing sex ratio and its implications for the profession. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(3), 349–369.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00413.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rekers, G. A., & Lovaas, O. I. (1974). Behavioral treatment of deviant sex-role behaviors in a male child. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7(2), 173–190.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1974.7-173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reyes, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., Sloman, K. N., Hall, A., Reed, R., Jansen, G., et al. (2006). Assessment of deviant arousal in adult male sex offenders with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(2), 173–188.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2006.46-05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reyes, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., & Hall, A. (2017). Comparison of arousal and preference assessment outcomes for sex offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(1), 27–37.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruiz, M. R. (1995). B. F. Skinner's radical behaviorism: Historical misconstructions and grounds for feminist reconstructions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(2), 161–179.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00285.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruiz, M. R. (1998). Personal agency in feminist theory: Evicting the illusive dweller. The Behavior Analyst, 21(2), 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruiz, M. R., & Roche, B. (2007). Values and the scientific culture of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 30(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Russo, N. F., Olmedo, E. L., Stapp, J., & Fulcher, R. (1981). Women and minorities in psychology. American Psychologist, 36(11), 1315–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.11.1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simon, J. L., Morris, E. K., & Smith, N. G. (2007). Trends in women's participation at the meetings of the Association for Behavior Analysis: 1975-2005. The Behavior Analyst, 30(2), 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York, NY, US: Knopf/Random House.Google Scholar
  40. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Oxford, England: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  41. Skinner, B. F. (1980). Notebooks. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Soreth, M. E., Dickson, C. A., & Terry, C. M. (2017). In memoriam: Maria del Rosario Ruiz. The Behavior Analyst, 40(2), 553–557.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0131-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolpert, R. S. (2005). A multicultural feminist analysis of Walden two. The Behavior Analyst Today, 6(3), 186–190.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological ScienceEastern Connecticut State UniversityWillimanticUSA

Personalised recommendations