Intersectional Feminism and Behavior Analysis
This paper compares facets of behavior analysis and intersectional feminist theory. We begin by describing the history of issues related to gender and sexuality in behavior analysis. Then, we explain how the goals of feminism and applied behavior analysis are aligned, with a focus on intersectional feminism. Intersectional feminism examines the influence of interacting variables (e.g., race, gender, and sexuality) that affect one’s experiences and behaviors, rather than focusing on a single factor, such as gender. Pragmatic behaviorism and intersectionality have many parallels, and by exploring them, researchers can generate more comprehensive explanations of behavior. With prevalent gender, race, and sexual orientation biases in contemporary society, it may be important for behavior analysts to be able to recognize these contingencies that have been previously overlooked. Describing the conceptual commonalities between these disciplines may be a stride towards inclusivity and advancement of the goals of each discipline.
KeywordsBehavior analysis Behaviorism Gender Intersectional feminism Sexuality
The authors would like to thank Clare Mehta and Laura Diller for their feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest associated with the publication of this manuscript, and all appropriate ethical standards have been upheld.
- American Psychological Association. (1995). Report of the task force on the changing gender composition of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- American Psychological Association. (2006). Women in the American Psychological Association. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/pi/women/committee/wapa-2006.pdf.
- Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB). (2016). Professional and ethical compliance code for behavior analysts. Retrieved from: https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/170706-compliance-code-english.pdf.
- Biglan, A. (2015). The Nurture Effect: how the science of human behavior can improve our lives and our world. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
- Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics, 1989 University of Chicago legal forum.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Geller, E. S. (2014). Actively caring for people: Cultivating a culture of compassion. Newport:Make-a-Difference LLC.Google Scholar
- Haldemann, D. M. (1999). The pseudo-science of sexual orientation conversion therapy. Angles, 4(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
- Nosik, M. R., Luke, M. M., & Carr, J. E. (2018). Representation of women in behavior analysis: An empirical analysis. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000118.
- Ostertag, P. A., & McNamara, J. R. (1991). 'Feminization' of psychology: The changing sex ratio and its implications for the profession. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(3), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00413.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruiz, M. R. (1995). B. F. Skinner's radical behaviorism: Historical misconstructions and grounds for feminist reconstructions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00285.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York, NY, US: Knopf/Random House.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Oxford, England: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1980). Notebooks. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar