Considerations of Baseline Classroom Conditions in Conducting Functional Behavior Assessments in School Settings
- 238 Downloads
Research has shown that environmental classroom variables affect academic performance and student behavior, and appropriate behavior is often related to the presence of effective teaching practices and classroom management (Moore Partin, Robertson, Maggin, Oliver, & Wehby Preventing School Failure, 54, 172–178, 2010). For behavior analysts consulting in elementary education, some referrals for assessment and treatment of individual student behavior can be resolved by helping teachers establish effective class-wide practices. For this reason, some researchers suggest that behavior analysts should assess baseline classroom conditions as part of a functional behavior assessment (FBA; Anderson & St. Peter Behavior Analysis in Practice, 6(2), 62, 2013; Sutherland & Wehby Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248, 2001). Through a literature review on effective classroom practices, we identified four specific classroom variables that have large effects on both learning outcomes and student behavior; we suggest consultants consider these four variables in baseline classroom assessments: (a) rates of active student responding (ASR), (b) appropriateness of the curriculum, (c) feedback and reinforcement, and (d) effective instructions and transitions. In this article, we will discuss each of these variables, describe how they can affect classroom behavior, and provide recommended targets from the research literature. We also provide a data-collection form for practitioners to use in their assessments of baseline classroom ecology, and for situations when these practices are not in place, we suggest potential resources for antecedent- and consequence-based interventions to decrease challenging classroom behavior.
KeywordsFunctional behavior assessment Schools Consultation School-based consultation Classroom management
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Aljadeff-Abergel, E., Peterson, S. M., Wiskirchen, R. R., Hagen, K. K., & Cole, M. L. (2017). Evaluating the temporal location of feedback: Providing feedback following performance vs. prior to performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2017.1309332.Google Scholar
- Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Barbetta, P. M., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1993). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of sight words by students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1993.26-111.Google Scholar
- Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., & Robinson, S. L. (1987). Application of an ecobehavioral approach to the evaluation of early intervention programs. In R. Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families (Vol. 3, pp. 123–155). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Chandler, L. K., & Dahlquist, C. M. (2014). Functional assessment: Strategies to prevent and remediate challenging behavior in school settings. New York, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Cihak, D., Fahrenkrog, C., Ayres, K. M., & Smith, C. (2010). The use of video modeling via a video iPod and a system of least prompts to improve transitional behaviors for students with autism spectrum disorders in the general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300709332346.Google Scholar
- Cipani, E., & Schock, K. M. (2010). Functional behavioral assessment, diagnosis, and treatment: A complete system for education and mental health settings. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Colvin, G., Sugai, G., Good, R. H., & Lee, Y. (1997). Using active supervision and precorrection to improve transition behaviors in an elementary school. School Psychology Quarterly, 12(4), 344–363 http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.library.wmich.edu/10.1037/h0088967.Google Scholar
- Connell, M. C., Carta, J. J., & Baer, D. M. (1993). Programming generalization of in-class transition skills: Teaching preschoolers with developmental delays to self-assess and recruit contingent teacher praise. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1993.26-345.Google Scholar
- Cook, C. R., Grady, E. A., Long, A. C., Renshaw, T., Codding, R. S., Fiat, A., & Larson, M. (2017). Evaluating the impact of increasing general education teachers’ ratio of positive-to-negative interactions on students’ classroom behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300716679137.Google Scholar
- Council for Exceptional Children. (1987). Academy for effective instruction: working with mildly handicapped students. Reston, VA.Google Scholar
- Craft, M. A., Alber, S. R., & Heward, W. L. (1998). Teaching elementary students with developmental disabilities to recruit teacher attention in a general education classroom: Effects on teacher praise and academic productivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-399.Google Scholar
- Ellis, E. S., Worthington, L. A., & Larkin, M. J. (1994). Executive summary of the research synthesis on effective teaching principles and the design of quality tools for educators (Technical Report No. 6). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED386854.pdf
- Engelmann, S. (1999, July). Student-program alignment and teaching to mastery. Paper presented at the 25th National Direct Instruction Conference, Eugene, OR. Retrieved from https://www.nifdi.org/docman/suggested-reading/white-papers-by-zig/900-student-program-alignment-and-teaching-to-mastery-by-siegfried-engelmann/file.
- Engelmann, S., & Becker, W. C. (1978). Systems for basic instruction: Theory and applications. In A. C. Catania & T. A. Brigham (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 325–377). New York, NY: Irvington.Google Scholar
- Ferro, J., Foster-Johnson, L., & Dunlap, G. (1996). Relation between curricular activities and problem behaviors of students with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101(2), 184–194.Google Scholar
- Fisher, C. W., & Berliner, D. C. (1985). Perspectives on instructional time. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
- Gardner, R., Heward, W. L., & Grossi, T. A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-63.Google Scholar
- Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Retrieved from https://dibels.uoregon.edu/assessment/index/material/.
- Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, J. Trap-Porter, & D. S. Hill (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.Google Scholar
- Gunter, P. L., Denny, R. K., Jack, S. L., Shores, R. E., & Nelson, C. M. (1993). Aversive stimuli in academic interactions between students with serious emotional disturbance and their teachers. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 265–274.Google Scholar
- Gunter, P. L., Reffel, J. M., Barnett, C. A., Lee, J. L., & Patrick, J. (2004). Academic response rates in elementary school classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 105–113.Google Scholar
- Johnson, K., & Street, E. M. (2013). Response to intervention and precision teaching: Creating synergy in the classroom. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kern, L., Childs, K. E., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Falk, G. D. (1994). Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-7.Google Scholar
- Lacy Rismiller, L. (2004). Effects of praise training and opportunities to respond on teachers’ praise statements and reprimands during classroom instruction. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Special Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
- Lewis, T. (2007a). Environmental inventory checklist. Retrieved from https://www.pbis.org/resource/192/classroom-checklists-effective-classroom-plan-environmental-inventory-checklist.
- Lewis, T. (2007b). Promoting positive & effective learning environments classroom checklist. Retrieved from https://www.pbis.org/resource/192/classroom-checklists-effective-classroom-plan-environmental-inventory-checklist.
- Marchand-Martella, N. E., Martella, R., & Lignugaris Kraft, B. (1997). Observation of direct instruction teaching behaviors: Determining a representative sample of time for supervision. International Journal of Special Education, 12, 30–41.Google Scholar
- Marchand-Martella, N. E., Slocum, T. A., & Martella, R. C. (2004). Introduction to direct instruction. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Marchant, M., & Young, K. R. (2001). The effects of a parent coach on parents’ acquisition and implementation of parenting skills. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 351–373.Google Scholar
- Matheson, A. S., & Shriver, M. D. (2005). Training teachers to give effective commands: Effects on student compliance and academic behaviors. School Psychology Review, 34, 202–219.Google Scholar
- Neef, N. A., Shafer, M. S., Egel, A. L., Cataldo, M. F., & Parrish, J. M. (1983). The class specific effects of compliance training with “do” and “don’t” requests: Analogue analysis and classroom application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1983.16-81.Google Scholar
- O’Neil, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Storey, K., & Sprague, J. R. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Pearson. (2012). Aimsweb technical manual. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. Retrieved from http://www.aimsweb.com/wp-content/uploads/aimsweb-Technical-Manual.pdf.
- Reinke, W. M., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Merrell, K. (2008). The classroom check-up: A classwide teacher consultation model for increasing praise and decreasing disruptive behavior. School Psychology Review, 37, 315–332.Google Scholar
- Repp, A. C., & Horner, R. H. (1999). Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Rivera, C. J., Mason, L. L., Jabeen, I., & Johnson, J. (2015). Increasing teacher praise and on task behavior for students with autism using mobile technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643415617375.
- Sainato, D. M., Strain, P. S., Lefebvre, D., & Rapp, N. (1987). Facilitating transition times with handicapped preschool children: A comparison between peer-mediated and antecedent prompt procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20(3), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1987.20-285.Google Scholar
- Schmit, J., Alper, S., Raschke, D., & Ryndak, D. (2000). Effects of using a photographic cueing package during routine school transitions with a child who has autism. Mental Retardation, 38(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2000)038<0131:EOUAPC>2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
- Scholastic. (2007). Scholastic reading inventory technical guide. New York, NY: Scholastic Reading.Google Scholar
- Smith, D. D., & Rivera, D. P. (1993). Effective discipline (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
- Sprick, R., Knight, J., Reinke, W., McKale-Skyles, T., & Barnes, L. (2010). Coaching classroom management: Strategies and tools for administrators and coaches. Eugene, OR: Pacific Northwest Publishing.Google Scholar
- Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of student with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200205.Google Scholar
- Talbott, E., & Coe, M. G. (1997). A developmental view of aggression and achievement. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 11, pp. 69–86). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Van Acker, R., Grant, S. H., & Henry, D. (1996). Teacher and student behavior as a function of risk for aggression. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 316–334.Google Scholar
- Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Doyle, P. M., Gast, D. L., & Griffen, A. K. (1992). Choral and individual responding during small group instruction: Identification of interactional effects. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 289–309.Google Scholar
- Wood, C. L., Mabry, L. E., Kretlow, A. G., Lo, Y., & Galloway, T. W. (2009). Effects of preprinted response cards on students’ participation and off-task behavior in a rural kindergarten classroom. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687050902800206.Google Scholar