Advertisement

Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 483–490 | Cite as

Using PowerPoint 2016 to Create Individualized Matching to Sample Sessions

  • Carol CummingsEmail author
  • Kathryn J. Saunders
Technical and Tutorials

Abstract

Discrete-trial-training procedures, particularly matching to sample (MTS), are often used to teach children with autism and/or intellectual disabilities. An example is touching a picture that corresponds to a spoken word. When conducted in a “tabletop” manner, the teacher must arrange several pictures on a table, provide the spoken word, and present response consequences, all while maintaining procedural integrity and collecting data. Using computer programs can greatly reduce the burden on practitioners, but many do not have the access, funding, or time to use complex and expensive software. This report serves as a guide to making MTS tasks that have many of the benefits of computerization using Microsoft® PowerPoint™ 2016, a program that many practitioners have basic knowledge of, and access to. Past papers have described the use of PowerPoint™ for whole classroom instruction. This report expands the use of PowerPoint™ to present individualized instruction that detects child responses and presents consequences based on those responses.

Keywords

Discrete-trial training Matching to sample Computerized instruction PowerPoint 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Author Carol Cummings declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Author Kathryn J. Saunders declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Blum, C., Parette, H. P., & Watts, E. H. (2009). Engaging young children in an emergent literacy curriculum using of Microsoft© PowerPoint™: Development, considerations, and opportunities. Research, Reflections and Innovations in Integrating ICT in Education, 1, 41–45.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman-Martin, M. B., Heller, K. W., Cihak, D. F., & Irvine, K. L. (2005). Using computer-assisted instruction and the nonverbal reading approach to teach word identification. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(2), 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Green, G. (2001). Behavior analytic instruction for learners with autism: Advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(2), 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grow, L., & LeBlanc, L. (2013). Teaching receptive language skills. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 6(1), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Holland, J. G. (1960). Teaching machines: An application of principles from the laboratory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 3(4), 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Keller, F. S. (1968). Good-bye, teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leaf, R., McEachin, J., & Harsh, J. D. (1999). A work in progress, behavior management strategies and a curriculum for intensive behavioral intervention. New York: DRL Books Inc..Google Scholar
  8. Parette, H. P., Blum, C., Boeckmann, N. M., & Watts, E. H. (2009). Teaching word recognition to young children who are at risk using Microsoft® PowerPoint™ coupled with direct instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(5), 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Petursdottir, A. I., & Aguilar, G. (2016). Order of stimulus presentation influences children's acquisition in receptive identification tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(1), 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Saunders, K. J., Johnston, M. D., Tompkins, B. F., Dutcher, D. L., & Williams, D. C. (1997). Generalized identity matching of two-dimensional forms by individuals with moderate to profound mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 102(3), 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Saunders, Hine, Hayashi, & Williams. (2016). Adventitious reinforcement of maladaptive stimulus control interferes with learning. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(3), 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Behavioral Science, Dole Human Development Center Rm 4001University of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Life Span Institute, Dole Human Development Center Rm 1052University of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations