Sample First versus Comparison First Stimulus Presentations: Preliminary Findings for Two Individuals with Autism
- 37 Downloads
The current study was a replication of Petursdottir and Aguilar (Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 58–68, 2016). Two different stimulus presentations were evaluated during auditory-visual discrimination training. A sample-first procedure, in which the sample stimulus was presented before the comparison stimuli, was compared to a comparison-first procedure, in which the sample presentation was presented after the comparison stimuli. The results indicated that both participants learned more quickly in the comparison-first condition, a finding that differed from Petursdottir and Aguilar (Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 58–68, 2016).
KeywordsMatching to sample Receptive language Stimulus control
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Joseph Vedora declares that he has no conflict of interest. Tiffany Barry declares that she has no conflict of interest. John C. Ward-Horner declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Leaf, R., & McEachin, J. (Eds.). (1999). A work in progress: Behavior management strategies and a curriculum for intensive behavioral treatment of autism. New York, NY: DRL Books.Google Scholar
- Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
- Martin, N., & Brownell, R. (2011). Receptive one-word picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Novato, CA: Academy Therapy Publications.Google Scholar
- McIlvane, W. J., Kledaras, J. B., Stoddard, L. T., & Dube, W. V. (1990). Delayed sample presentation in MTS: Some possible advantages for teaching individuals with developmental limitations. Human Behavior Bulletin, 8, 31–33.Google Scholar
- Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67–76.Google Scholar