An Application of the Group-Oriented Concurrent-Chains Arrangement
Group contingencies are a set of behavior management procedures used to improve the behavior of several students simultaneously. Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of each group contingency in managing academic and challenging behaviors, the decision to select one group contingency over another may be difficult for teachers, especially if similar efficacy is found. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of three group contingencies on disruptive behavior with 13 typically developing eighth-grade students. Results showed that all three group contingencies reduced levels of disruptive behavior from baseline levels. We then assessed the students’ individual preferences for the group contingencies using a group-oriented concurrent-chains procedure. Most students showed preference for one of the group contingencies, and most preferred the independent group contingency. These results demonstrated that the group-oriented concurrent-chains procedure was an effective and efficient method of identifying individual preferences for behavior-change procedures in a classroom setting.
KeywordsConcurrent-chains arrangements Group contingencies Preferences
This study was not funded.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Kristina K. Vargo declares that she has no conflict of interest. Kathleen Becknell declares that she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Brower-Breitwieser, C. M., Miltenberger, R. G., Gross, A., Fuqua, R. W., & Breitwieser, J. (2008). The use of concurrent operants preference assessment to evaluate choice of interventions for children diagnosed with autism. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 4, 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heering, P. W., & Wilder, D. A. (2006). The use of dependent group contingencies to increase on-task behavior in two general education classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 459–468.Google Scholar
- Luczynski, K. C., & Hanley, G. P. (2009). Do children prefer contingencies? An evaluation of the efficacy of and preference for contingent versus noncontingent social reinforcement during play. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Romero, F. (1998). The negative effects of using a group contingency system of classroom management. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25, 130–133 Retrieved from http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Education-Treatment-Children/152016263.html.Google Scholar
- Skinner, C. H., Williams, R. L., & Neddenriep, C. E. (2004). Using interdependent group-oriented reinforcement to enhance academic performance in general education classrooms. School Psychology Review, 33, 384–397.Google Scholar