Advertisement

Mastery of Echoics in Chinese Establishes Bidirectional Naming in Chinese for Preschoolers with Naming in English

  • Yu Cao
  • R. Douglas Greer
Article

Abstract

The onset of the verbal behavior developmental cusp of bidirectional naming (BiN) in a second language makes it possible for monolingual English-speaking children to learn names of things in a second language incidentally. We conducted 2 experiments to identify why monolingual English-speaking children cannot demonstrate BiN in another language when they demonstrated BiN in their native language. In Experiment I, using a group design (n = 32 preschoolers), we identified Chinese speech sounds that monolingual English-speaking children with BiN in English for familiar stimuli could not echo. In Experiment II, using a multiple-probe design, we investigated if mastery of echoics with the speech sounds identified in Experiment I would result in BiN in Chinese with 6 participants from Experiment I. The dependent variable was untaught responses to the probe stimuli presented following the naming experience based on the echoic stimuli from Experiment I. The results showed that echoic training was functionally related to the establishment of BiN in the second language. It appeared that the emission of accurate echoics might be the key to second-language BiN and that emergent correspondence between producing and hearing that occurs with the mastery of the echoic responding may be the source of reinforcement.

Keywords

Naming Bilingual naming Verbal behavior developmental cusp Fast mapping Echoic training for naming Familiar and nonfamiliar stimuli and naming 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were reviewed by the Institutional Review Board of Columbia University Teachers College and the Fred S. Keller School and were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 235–249.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17–29.Google Scholar
  3. Carnerero, J. J., & Pérez-González, L. A. (2014). Induction of naming after observing visual stimuli and their names in children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(10), 2514–2526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi, J., Greer, R. D., & Keohane, D. (2015). Effects of auditory matching on the intercept of speaker and listener repertoires. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 20(2), 186–206.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h010131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du, L., Broto, J., & Greer, R. D. (2015). The effects of establishment of conditioned reinforcement for observing responses for 3D stimuli on generalized visual match-to-sample in children with autism spectrum disorders. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 16(1), 82–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2015.1065655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fiorile, C. A., & Greer, R. D. (2007). The induction of naming in children with no prior tact responses as a function of multiple exemplar histories of instruction. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 23(1), 71–87.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393048 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilic, L., & Greer, R. D. (2011). Establishing naming in typically developing two-year-old children as a function of multiple exemplar speaker and listener responses. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 157–177.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393099 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Greer, R. D. (2014). CABAS® international curriculum and inventory of repertoires for children from preschool through kindergarten. Yonkers: Fred. S. Keller School.Google Scholar
  9. Greer, R. D., & Du, L. (2010). Generic instruction versus intensive tact instruction and the emission of spontaneous speech. The Journal of Speech and Language Pathology – Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(1), 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greer, R. D., & Du, L. (2015a). Experience and the onset of the capability to learn names incidentally by exclusion. The Psychological Record, 65(2), 355–373.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0111-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greer, R. D., & Du, L. (2015b). Identification and establishment of reinforcers that make the development of complex social language possible. International Journal of Behavior Analysis & Autism Spectrum Disorder, 1(1), 13–34.Google Scholar
  12. Greer, R. D., & Han, H. S. A. (2015). Establishment of conditioned reinforcement for visual observing and the emergence of generalized visual-identity matching. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 20(2), 227–252.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greer, R. D., & Longano, J. (2010). A rose by naming: How we may learn how to do it. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26(1), 73–106.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393085 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Greer, R. D., & O’Sullivan, D. (2007). The incidence of naming for novel two-dimensional stimuli in first graders at the beginning, mid-year, and end of the year. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, San Diego.Google Scholar
  15. Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Greer, R. D., & Speckman, J. (2009). The integration of speaker and listener responses: A theory of verbal development. The Psychological Record, 59(3), 449–488.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greer, R. D., Stolfi, L., Chavez-Brown, M., & Rivera-Valdes, C. (2005). The emergence of the listener to speaker component of naming in children as a function of multiple exemplar instruction. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 123–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393014 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Greer, R. D., Stolfi, L., & Pistoljevic, N. (2007). Emergence of naming in preschoolers: A comparison of multiple and single exemplar instruction. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8(2), 109–131.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2007.11434278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen Edwards, J. G., & Zampini, M. L. (2008). Phonology and second language acquisition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helou-Care, Y. J. (2008). The effects of the acquisition of naming on reading comprehension with academically delayed middle school students diagnosed with behavior disorders (Doctoral dissertation). Available from UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. 3317559).Google Scholar
  21. Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185–241.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the international phonetic association: A guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. International Phonetic Association. (2015). International Phonetic Alphabet chart. Retrieved from https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/sites/default/files/IPA_Kiel_2015.pdf
  24. Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2009). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(2), 866–877.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3148196 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jeong, H., Sugiugra, M., Sassa, Y., Yokoyama, S., Horie, K., Sato, S., et al. (2007). Cross-linguistic influence on brain activation during second language processing: An fMRI study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), 175–187.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907002921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kan, P. F., & Kohnert, K. (2008). Fast mapping by bilingual preschool children. Journal of Child Language, 35(3), 495–514.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008604 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kan, P. F., Sadagopan, N., Janich, L., & Andrade, M. (2014). Effects of speech practice on fast mapping in monolingual and bilingual speakers. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 57(3), 929–941.  https://doi.org/10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-13-0045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kisilevsky, B. S., Hains, S. M., Lee, K., Xie, X., Huang, H., Ye, H., ... Wang, Z. (2003). Effects of experience on fetal voice recognition. Psychological Science, 14(3), 220–224.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02435
  30. Krueger, C., & Garvan, C. (2014). Emergence and retention of learning in early fetal development. Infant Behavior & Development, 37(2), 162–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831–843.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1533 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F., & Liu, H. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 9096–9101.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1532872100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lenneberg, E. H., Chomsky, N., & Marx, O. (1967). The Biological Foundations of Language. In Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lo, C. (2016). How the presence of the listener half of naming leads to multiple stimulus control (Doctoral dissertation). Available from UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. 10100022).Google Scholar
  35. Longano, J. M., & Greer, R. D. (2014). Is the source of reinforcement for naming multiple conditioned reinforcers for observing responses? The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31(1), 96–117.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0022-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Lowenkron, B. (2006). Joint control and the selection of stimuli from their description. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 129–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393035 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Miguel, C. (2016). Common and intraverbal bidirectional naming. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(2), 125–138.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0066-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moon, C., Lagercrantz, H., & Kuhl, P. K. (2013). Language experienced in utero affects vowel perception after birth: A two-country study. Acta Paediatrica, 102(2), 156–160.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12098 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mosca, K. F. (2015). Incidental learning of two languages by bilingual Swedish- and English-speaking children, monolingual English-speaking children and monolingual English-speaking adults (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  40. Nedelcu, R. I., Fields, L., & Arntzen, E. (2015). Arbitrary conditional discriminative functions of meaningful stimuli and enhanced equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103(2), 349–360.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.141 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nishi, K., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: Influence of training sets. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(6), 1496–1509.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/103 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Orlans, S. E. (2017). The effects of naming experiences and properties of visual stimuli on language acquisition and the relationship between curiosity and naming (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation Publishing database. (Publication No. 10269736).Google Scholar
  43. Pistoljevic, N., & Greer, R. D. (2006). The effects of daily intensive tact instruction on preschool students’ emission of pure tacts and mands in non-instructional setting. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 3(1), 103–120.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development, 7(1), 49–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Woolslayer, L. (2013). The functional relation between the onset of naming and the joining of listener to untaught speaker responses (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation Publishing database. (Publication No. 3560915).Google Scholar
  47. Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2007). Neural plasticity in speech acquisition and learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), 147–160.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907002908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (2011). Preschool language scales (5th ed.). San Antonio: Pearson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Gotham ChildrenNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations