Advertisement

Out of the Lab: Shaping an Ecological and Constructional Cultural Systems Science

  • Mark A. Mattaini
Cultural and Behavioral Systems Science

Abstract

Contemporary societies face critical, interlocking, “wicked” challenges, including economic inequities and marginalization, personal and collective violence, ethnic and religious conflicts, degradation of “the commons,” climate change, and more, and all of these issues clearly are grounded in behavior. An adequate culturo-behavior science could be positioned to advance and leverage research and interventions supporting community well-being, and contribute to overcoming urgent societal and global challenges. The current state of cultural systems science, however, is limited by theory and methodology, and by competition for attention with well-established research and practice opportunities related to individual-level challenges. In this article, the author explores those limitations, and suggests a more expansive perspective drawing on historical and contemporary ecological science and contemporary theories of complex systems. Research guided by established science within those disciplines offers opportunities to move cultural systems science out of the lab, and into a more adequate, environmentally rich stance drawing on ecological strategies, recursively integrating contextual observations, conceptual advances, and in vivo experimentation. Examples of each of those strategies and exploration of developmental programs of research grounded in such integration are explored.

Keywords

Cultural systems science Ecological systems Culturo-behavior science Complex systems 

Notes

References

  1. Alavosius, M., Newsome, D., Houmanfar, R., & Biglan, A. (2015). A functional contextualist analysis of the behavior and organizational practices relevant to climate change. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 513–530). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, T. F. H., & Hoekstra, T. W. (2015). Toward a unified ecology (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson-Carpenter, K. D., Watson-Thompson, J., Jones, M., & Chaney, L. (2014). Using communities of practice to support implementation of evidence-based prevention strategies. Journal of Community Practice, 22(1&2), 176–188.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2014.901268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aspholm, R. R. (2016). “This ain't the nineties”: Chicago's black street gangs in the twenty-first century (Unpublished doctoral diss.). University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
  5. Aspholm, R. R. (in press).“This ain't the nineties”: Chicago's black street gangs in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (note: title may change)Google Scholar
  6. Aspholm, R. R., & Mattaini, M. A. (2017). Youth activism as violence prevention. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression (pp. 1–12). Hoboken: Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057574.whbva104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI). (1989). Statement on the right to effective behavioral treatment. Retrieved from https://www.abainternational.org/about-us/policies-and-positions/right-to-effective-behavioral-treatment,-1989.aspx. Accessed 30 May 2019.
  8. Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI). (2010). Statement on restraint and seclusion. Retrieved from https://www.abainternational.org/about-us/policies-and-positions/restraint-and-seclusion,-2010.aspx. Accessed 30 May 2019.
  9. Atkinson, K. N. (2012). Education for liberation: A precursor to youth activism for social justice (Unpublished doctoral diss.). University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Baer, D. M. (1974). A note on the absence of a Santa Claus in any known ecosystem: A rejoinder to Willems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7(1), 167–169.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1974.7-167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Baker, T., Schwenk, T., Piasecki, M., Smith, G. S., Reimer, D., Jacobs, N., et al. (2015). Cultural change in a medical school: A data-driven management of entropy. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(1–2), 95–122.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1035826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good Behavior Game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2(2), 119–124.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Bates, M. (1950). The nature of natural history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Baum, W. M. (2012). Rethinking reinforcement: Allocation, induction, and contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97(1), 101–124.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Beckage, B., Kauffman, S., Gross, L. J., Zia, A., & Koliba, C. (2013). More complex complexity: Exploring the nature of computational irreducibility across physical, biological, and human social systems. In H. Zenil (Ed.), Irreducibility and computational equivalence (pp. 79–88). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. “Complexity & selection.” (2004). [special issue] Behavior & Social Issues, 13(2).Google Scholar
  17. Bertalanffy, L. v. (1968). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  18. Biglan, A. (2009). The role of advocacy organizations in reducing negative externalities. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29(3–4), 215–230.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01608060903092086.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Biglan, A., Ary, D., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2000). The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community intervention research. Prevention Science, 1(1), 31–49.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010024016308.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Bogdanov, A. A. (1980). Essays in tektology: The general science of organization. (George Gorelik, trans. Seaside: Intersystems Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Brayko, C., Houmanfar, R., & Ghezzi, E. (2016). Organized cooperation: A behavioral perspective on volunteerism. Behavior & Social Issues, 25, 77–98.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cagnin, C., Amanatidou, E., & Keenan, M. (2012). Orienting European innovation systems towards grand challenges and the roles that FTA can play. Science & Public Policy, 39, 140–152.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Couto, K. C., & Sandaker, I. (2016). Natural, behavioral and cultural selection-analysis: An integrative approach. Behavior & Social Issues, 25, 54–60.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cowie, S., & Davison, M. (2016). Control by reinforcers across time and space: A review of recent choice research. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105(2), 246–269.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Root, W. B. (2018). Why we are still not acting to save the world: The upward challenge of a post-Skinnerian behavior science. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41, 241–267.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0162-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dyball, R., & Newell, B. (2015). Understanding human ecology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Eagleman, D. M. (2013). Why public dissemination of science matters: A manifesto. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(30), 12147–12149.  https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2556-13.2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Embry, D. D. (2002). The Good Behavior Game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 5(4), 273–297.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020977107086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fantino, E. (1985). Behavior analysis and behavioral ecology: A synergistic coupling. The Behavior Analyst, 8(2), 151–157.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Some values guiding community research and action. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(4), 621–636.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-621.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Fawcett, S. B., Bernstein, G. S., Czyzewski, M. J., Greene, B. F., Hannah, G. T., Iwata, B. A., . . . & Seekins, T. (1988). Behavior analysis and public policy. The Behavior Analyst, 11(1), 11–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392450 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Francisco, V. T., Paine, A. L., & Fawcett, S. B. (1993). A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Health Education Research, 8(3), 403–416.  https://doi.org/10.1093/her/8.3.403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fulambarker, A. (2013). Moving forward by going back to our roots: Transformative justness approach to intimate partner violence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
  35. Gambrill, E. (1994). What's in a name? Task-centered, empirical, and behavioral practice. Social Service Review, 68(4), 578–599.  https://doi.org/10.1086/604085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gandhi, M. K. (1945). Constructive programme: Its meaning and place. India: Navajivan Publishing House.Google Scholar
  37. Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11(2), 161–179.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392470.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Glenn, S. S. (1993). Windows on the 21st century. The Behavior Analyst, 16(2), 133–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392619.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., . . . & Vasconcelos, L. A. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior & Social Issues, 25, 11–27.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goldiamond, I. (2002). Toward a constructional approach to social problems: Ethical and constitutional issues raised by applied behavior analysis. Behavior & Social Issues, 11(2), 108–197. (Original work published 1974).  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v11i2.92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goldstein, A. P., Keller, H., & Erné, D. (1985). Changing the abusive parent. Champaign: Research Press.Google Scholar
  42. Granic, I., & Patterson, G. R. (2006). Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: A dynamic systems approach. Psychological Review, 113(1), 101.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Grant, L. K. (2011). In response: Can we consume our way out of climate change? A call for analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 245–266.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Greene, B. F., Winett, R. A., Van Houten, R., Geller, E. S., & Iwata, B. A. (1987). Behavior analysis in the community: Readings from the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  45. Grossmann, K., & Haase, A. (2016). Neighborhood change beyond clear storylines: What can assemblage and complexity theories contribute to understandings of seemingly paradoxical neighborhood development? Urban Geography, 37(5), 727–747.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1113807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hörl, E., & Burton, J. (Eds.). (2017). General ecology: The new ecological paradigm. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Houmanfar, R., A., Alavosius, M. P., Morford, Z. H., Reimer, D., & Herbst, S. A.(2015). Functions of organizational leaders in cultural change: Financial and social well-being. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35, 4–27.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1035827
  49. Houmanfar, R., Rodrigues, N. J., & Ward, T. A. (2010). Emergence & metacontingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior & Social Issues, 19, 53–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Houmanfar, R. A., & Mattaini, M. A. (Eds.). (2017). Leadership and cultural change: Managing future well-being. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Houmanfar, R. A., Rodrigues, N. J., & Smith, G. S. (2009). Role of communication networks in behavioral systems analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29, 257–275.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01608060903092102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jason, L., & Glenwick, D. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Jason, L. A., Braciszewski, J., Olson, B. D., & Ferrari, J. R. (2005). Increasing the number of mutual help recovery homes for substance abusers: Effects of government policy and funding assistance. Behavior & Social Issues, 14(1), 71–79.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v14i1.121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Krapfl J. E., & Kruja B. (2015). Leadership and Cultural Change. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management (JOBM) 2009, 35(1&2), 28–43, Special Issues.Google Scholar
  55. Kaplan, B. A., Gelino, B. W., & Reed, D. D. (2018). A behavioral economic approach to green consumerism: Demand for reusable shopping bags. Behavior & Social Issues, 27, 20–30.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v27i0.8003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Karban, R., Huntzinger, M., & Pearse, I. S. (2014). How to do ecology: A concise handbook. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kerlinger, F. N. (1966). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  58. Killeen, P. R. (2017). The non-Darwinian evolution of behavers and behaviors. Behavioural Processes, 161, 45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Killeen, P. R., & Jacobs, K. W. (2017). Coal is not black, snow is not white, food is not a reinforcer: The roles of affordances and dispositions in the analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 40(1), 17–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0080-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kwakkel, J. H., & Pruyt, E. (2015). Using system dynamics for grand challenges: The ESDMA approach. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 32(3), 358–375.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lamal, P. A. (Ed.). (1991). Behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  62. Lamal, P. A. (Ed.). (1997). Cultural contingencies: Behavior analytic perspectives on cultural practices. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  63. Lee, C. M. (2016). Speaking up for science. Trends in Immunology, 37(4), 265–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2016.02.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Leflot, G., van Lier, P. A., Onghena, P., & Colpin, H. (2010). The role of teacher behavior management in the development of disruptive behaviors: An intervention study with the Good Behavior Game. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(6), 869–882.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9411-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Loehle, C. (2004). Challenges of ecological complexity. Ecological Complexity, 1(1), 3–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2003.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Malott, M. (2013). Synergy of repertoires and metacontingencies: An account of the Mexican Muralist Movement. Unpublished paper presented on October 8, 2013, at the Association for Behavior Analysis International conference at Merida, Mexico.Google Scholar
  67. Malott, M. E. (2003). Paradox of organizational change: Engineering organizations with behavioral systems analysis. Reno: Context Press.Google Scholar
  68. Mattaini, M. A. (1993). More than a thousand words: Graphics for clinical practice. Washington, DC: NASW Press.Google Scholar
  69. Mattaini, M. A. (2002). Peace power for adolescents: Strategies for a culture of nonviolence. Washington, DC: NASW Press.Google Scholar
  70. Mattaini, M. A. (2013). Strategic nonviolent power: The science of Satyagraha. Edmonton: University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Mattaini, M. A. (2015). Constructive noncooperation: Toward a 21st century, science-based “constructive programme”. In R. Amster, L. Finley, E. Pries, & R. McCutcheon (Eds.), Peace studies between tradition and innovation (pp. 83–101). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  72. Mattaini, M. A., & Aspholm, R. (2016). Contributions of behavioral systems science to leadership for a new progressive movement. The Behavior Analyst, 39(1), 109–121.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-015-0043-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Mattaini, M. A., & Holtschneider, C. (Eds.). (2016). Foundations of social work practice: A graduate text. Washington, DC: NASW Press.Google Scholar
  74. Mattaini, M. A., McGowan, B. G., & Williams, G. (1996). Child maltreatment. In M. A. Mattaini & B. A. Thyer (Eds.), Finding solutions to social problems: Behavioral strategies for change (pp. 223–266). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McDowell, J. J., Calvin, O. L., Hackett, R., & Klapes, B. (2017). Falsification of matching theory and confirmation of an evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics in a critical experiment. Behavioural Processes, 140, 61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.03.025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. McDowell, J. J., & Popa, A. (2009). Beyond continuous mathematics and traditional scientific analysis: Understanding and mining Wolfram's A new kind of science. Behavioural Processes, 81, 343–352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.01.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  78. Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Moore, J. (2003). Behavior analysis, mentalism, and the path to social justice. The Behavior Analyst, 26(2), 181–193.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392075.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Moore, J., & Shook, F. L. (2001). Certification, accreditation, and quality control in behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 45–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.  https://doi.org/10.17226/11153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Neuringer, A. (1991). Humble behaviorism. The Behavior Analyst, 14(1), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392543.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Nevin, J. A. (2018). Variation, selection, and social action. Behavior & Social Issues, 27, AA1–AA3.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v27i0.8275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ninness, C., Henderson, R., Ninness, S. K., & Halle, S. (2015). Probability pyramiding revisited: Univariate, multivariate, and neural network analyses of complex data. Behavior & Social Issues, 24, 164–186.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v24i0.6048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ninness, C., Lauter, J. L., Coffee, M., Clary, L., Kelly, E., Rumph, M., . . . & Ninness, S. K. (2012). Behavioral and physiological neural network analyses: A common pathway toward pattern recognition and prediction. The Psychological Record, 62(4), 579–598.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ninness, C., Rumph, M., Clary, L., Lawson, D., Lacy, J. T., Halle, S., . . . & Forney, D. (2013). Neural network and multivariate analyses: Pattern recognition in academic and social research. Behavior & Social Issues, 22, 49–63.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Odum, H. T., & Odum, E. P. (1953). Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  88. Parsons, T., & Smelser, N. J. (1999). Economy and society: A study in the integration of economic and social theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Project Nia. (2013). Building healthy communities. Accessed at http://www.project-nia.org/
  90. Rehfeldt, R. A. (2011). Toward a technology of derived stimulus relations: An analysis of articles published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1992–2009. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 109–119.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-109.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Rice, A. J. (2018). Manufacturing failure: Race, revitalization and the takeover of Detroit public schools. SSRN. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3286690. Accessed 30 May 2019.
  92. Riestenberg, N. (2012). Circle in the square: Building community and repairing harm in school. St. Paul: Living Justice Press.Google Scholar
  93. Rizzo, A., & Galanakis, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary urbanism: Three experiences from Europe and Canada. Cities, 47, 35–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ross, R. (2006). Returning to the teachings: Exploring aboriginal justice. Toronto: Penguin Books 1996.Google Scholar
  95. Saleem, J. (2018). Young people in St. Louis are taking the lead in working for racial justice in their schools and communities. Quaker Action. Accessed at: https://www.afsc.org/document/quaker-action-resistance-to-rebuilding-summer-2018-pdf. Accessed 30 May 2019.
  96. Sharp, G. (2005). Waging nonviolent struggle: 20 th century practice and 21 st century potential. Manchester: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
  97. Sidman, M. (2001). Coercion and its fallout (Rev. ed.). Boston: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  98. Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  99. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  100. Skinner, B. F. (1976). Walden two. (Updated ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  101. Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Upon further reflection. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  103. Smith, G. S., Houmanfar, R., & Louis, S. J. (2011). The participatory role of verbal behavior in an elaborated account of metacontingency: From conceptualization to investigation. Behavior & Social Issues, 20, 122–146.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v20i0.3662.
  104. Stephan, M. J., & Thompson, T. P. (2018). Why you should never underestimate a bunch of well-organized teenager protesters. Washington Post. Accessed at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/04/04/why-you-should-never-underestimate-a-bunch-of-well-organized-teenage-protesters/?utm_term=.9cebe5455b61. Accessed 30 May 2019.
  105. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10(2), 349–367.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. Sturmey, P. (Ed.). (2017). The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  107. Todorov, J. C., & Vasconcelos, I. (2015). Experimental analysis of the behavior of persons in groups: Selection of an aggregate product in a metacontingency. Behavior & Social Issues, 24, 111–125.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v24i0.5424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Tufte, E. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
  109. Tufte, E. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Cheshire: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
  110. Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
  111. Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual explanation: Images and quantities, evidence and narrative. Cheshire: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
  112. Valentinov, V., & Chatalova, L. (2016). Institutional economics and social dilemmas: A systems theory perspective. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 33(1), 138–149.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Vichi, C., Andery, M. A. P. A., & Glenn, S. S. (2009). A metacontingency experiment: The effects of contingent consequences on patterns of interlocking contingencies of reinforcement. Behavior & Social Issues, 18(1), 41–57.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v18i1.2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Watson-Thompson, J., Woods, N. K., Schober, D. J., & Schultz, J. A. (2013). Enhancing the capacity of substance abuse prevention coalitions through training and technical assistance. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 41(3), 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., & McQueen, K. (2009). Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121–140.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Willems, E. P. (1974). Behavioral technology and behavioral ecology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7(1), 151–165.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1974.7-151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign: Wolfram Media.Google Scholar
  118. Zenil, H. (Ed.). (2013). Irreducibility and computational equivalence: 10 years after Wolfram’s A new kind of science. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jane Addams College of Social WorkUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.PaguateUSA

Personalised recommendations