Advertisement

Perspectives on Behavior Science

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 309–318 | Cite as

Role Model for Pursuing an Expansive Science of Behavior: James G. Holland

  • Thomas S. Critchfield
  • R. Douglas Greer
  • Kent Johnson
  • Joseph E. Morrow
  • John A. Nevin
  • Michael Perone
In Memoriam

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

This paper describes no new primary empirical work and as such is not subject to oversight by a research ethics body.

References

  1. Doran, J., & Holland, J. G. (1971). Eye movements as a function of response contingencies measured by the blackout technique. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 11–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 161–179.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldiamond, I. (1974). Toward a constructional approach to social problems: ethical and constitutional issues raised by applied behavior analysis. Behavior, 2, 1–84.Google Scholar
  5. Hake, D. F. (1982). The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal research. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 21–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Holland, J. G. (1957). Technique for behavioral analysis of human observing. Science, 125, 248–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holland, J. G. (1958a). Counting by humans on a fixed-ratio schedule of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 179–181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Holland, J. G. (1958b). Human vigilance: the rate of observing an instrument is controlled by the schedule of signal detections. Science, 128, 61–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland, J. G. (1974). Political implications of applying behavioral psychology. In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, & J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior, vol. 3: behavior modification in education (pp. 413–419). Glenview: Scott, Foresman, and Company.Google Scholar
  11. Holland, J. G. (1975). Behavior modification for prisoners, patients, and other people as a prescription for the planned society. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 1, 81–95.Google Scholar
  12. Holland, J. G. (1976). Ethical implications of behavior modification. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 16(3), 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holland, J. G. (1977). Behaviorism and the social system. In N. Datan & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: dialectical perspectives on experimental research (pp. 311–316). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holland, J. G. (1978a). To Cuba with the Venceremos Brigade. Behaviorists for Social Action Journal, 1, 21–28.Google Scholar
  15. Holland, J. G. (1978b). Behaviorism: part of the problem or part of the solution? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 163–174.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Holland, J. G., & Skinner, B. F. (1961). The analysis of behavior: a program for self instruction. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Holland, J. G., Solomon, C., Doran, J., & Frezza, D. A. (1976). The analysis of behavior in planning instruction. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (2015). School-wide PBIS: an example of applied behavior analysis implemented at a scale of social importance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 80–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamarre, J., & Holland, J. G. (1985). The functional independence of mands and tacts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 5–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Mace, F. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Translational research in behavior analysis: historical traditions and imperative for the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 293–312.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Nevin, J. A. (1969). Signal detection theory and operant behavior: a review of David M. Green and John A. Swets’ Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 475–480.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Nevin, J. A. (2008). Stimuli, reinforcers, and private events. The Behavior Analyst, 31, 113–126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Nuzzolo-Gomez, R., & Greer, R. D. (2004). Emergence of untaught mands or tacts with novel adjective-object pairs as a function of instructional history. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 30–47.Google Scholar
  24. Pear, R. (1986, February 5). Reagan seeks welfare plan to free poor from government dependency. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1986/02/05/us/reagan-seeks-welfare-plan-to-free-poor-from-government-dependency.html.
  25. Perone, M., & Baron, A. (1980). Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulus correlated with extinction or increased effort. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 239–261.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Rutherford, A. (2000). Radical behaviorism and psychology’s public: BF Skinner in the popular press, 1934–1990. History of Psychology, 3, 371–395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schroeder, S., & Holland, J. G. (1968). Operant control of eye movements during human vigilance. Science, 161, 292–293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schroeder, S. R., & Holland, J. G. (1969). Reinforcement of eye movements with concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 897–903.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Wildemann, D. G., & Holland, J. G. (1972). Control of a continuous response dimension by a continuous stimulus dimension. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 419–434.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Winett, R. A., & Winkler, R. (1972). Current behavior modification in the classroom: be still, be quiet, be docile. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 499–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas S. Critchfield
    • 1
  • R. Douglas Greer
    • 2
  • Kent Johnson
    • 3
  • Joseph E. Morrow
    • 4
  • John A. Nevin
    • 5
  • Michael Perone
    • 6
  1. 1.Illinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  2. 2.Teachers College Columbia UniversityNew York CityUSA
  3. 3.Morningside AcademySeattleUSA
  4. 4.Applied Behavior ConsultantsSacramentoUSA
  5. 5.University of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  6. 6.West Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations