Advertisement

Perspectives on Behavior Science

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 95–119 | Cite as

Sidman Goes to College: A Meta-Analysis of Equivalence-Based Instruction in Higher Education

  • Julia Brodsky
  • Daniel M. Fienup
Article

Abstract

Equivalence-based instruction (EBI) is a pedagogy based on the principles of stimulus equivalence for teaching academically relevant concepts. This self-paced and mastery-based methodology meets many of the instructional design standards suggested by Skinner (1968), adds generative learning by programming for derived stimulus–stimulus relations, and can be particularly useful in the context of a college course in which students must learn numerous concepts. In this article, we provide the first meta-analysis of EBI in higher education. The authors conducted a systematic literature search that identified 31 applied, college-level EBI experiments across 28 articles. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for single-subject and group design studies. Results showed that EBI is more effective than no instruction and an active control and that studies comparing EBI variants show differences between training variants. Future research should increase internal, external, and statistical conclusion validity to promote the mainstream use of EBI in classrooms.

Keywords

Equivalence-based instruction Higher education Meta-analysis Relational frame theory Stimulus equivalence Systematic review 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Ria Bissoon, Haeri Gim, Radiyyah Hussein, and Rika Ortega for assistance in conducting this study. We thank Drs. Alexandra Logue and Robert Lanson for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. We also thank the following researchers for providing raw data sets for this study: Dr. Leif Albright, Dr. Thomas Critchfield, Dr. John O’Neill, Dr. Kenneth Reeve, Dr. Ruth Anne Rehfeldt, Dr. Emily Sandoz, and Brooke Walker.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.

  1. Adams, B. J., Fields, L., & Verhave, T. (1993). Effects of test order on intersubject variability during equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 43, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. *Albright, L., Reeve, K. F., Reeve, S. A., & Kisamore, A. N. (2015). Teaching statistical variability with equivalence-based instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 883–894.Google Scholar
  3. *Albright, L., Schnell, L., Reeve, K. F., & Sidener, T. M. (2016). Using stimulus equivalence-based instruction to teach graduate students in applied behavior analysis to interpret operant functions of behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 290–309.Google Scholar
  4. *Alter, M. M., & Borrero, J. C. (2015). Teaching generatively: learning about disorders and disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 376–389.Google Scholar
  5. Arntzen, E. (2004). Probability of equivalence formation: familiar stimuli and training sequence. The Psychological Record, 54, 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyce, T. E., & Hineline, P. N. (2002). Interteaching: a strategy for enhancing the user-friendliness of behavioral arrangements in the college classroom. The Behavior Analyst, 25, 215–226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). Labor market activity, education, and partner status among America’s young adults at 29: results from a longitudinal survey. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/nlsyth.pdf
  10. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research: handbook of research on teaching. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 12, 997–1003.Google Scholar
  12. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 3.3) [Computer software]. (2014). Englewood. NJ: Biostat Available from http://www.meta-analysis.com.
  13. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  14. *Critchfield, T. S. (2014). Online equivalence-based instruction about statistical inference using written explanations instead of match-to-sample training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 47, 606–611.Google Scholar
  15. Critchfield, T. S., & Fienup, D. M. (2008). Stimulus equivalence. In S. F. Davis & W. F. Buskist (Eds.), 21st century psychology (pp. 360–372). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. *Critchfield, T. S., & Fienup, D. M. (2010). Using stimulus equivalence technology to teach statistical inference in a group setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 763–768.Google Scholar
  17. *Critchfield, T. S., & Fienup, D. M. (2013). A “happy hour” effect in translational stimulus relations research. The Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 29, 2–7.Google Scholar
  18. Critchfield, T. S., & Twyman, J. S. (2014). Prospective instructional design: establishing conditions for emergent learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 13, 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. *Fields, L., Travis, R., Roy, D., Yadlovker, E., de Aguiar-Rocha, L., & Sturmey, P. (2009). Equivalence class formation: a method for teaching statistical interactions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 575–593.Google Scholar
  22. Fields, L., Verhave, T., & Fath, S. (1984). Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: a methodological analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 143–157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Fienup, D. M., & Brodsky, J. (2017). Effects of mastery criterion on the emergence of derived equivalence relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 843–848.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. *Fienup, D. M., Covey, D. P., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Teaching brain–behavior relations economically with stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 43, 19–33.Google Scholar
  25. *Fienup, D. M., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Efficiently establishing concepts of inferential statistics and hypothesis decision making through contextually controlled equivalence classes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 437–462.Google Scholar
  26. *Fienup, D. M., & Critchfield, T. S. (2011). Transportability of equivalence-based programmed instruction: efficacy and efficiency in a college classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 435–450.Google Scholar
  27. *Fienup, D. M., Critchfield, T. S., & Covey, D. P. (2009). Building contextually-controlled equivalence classes to teach about inferential statistics: a preliminary demonstration. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 27, 1–10.Google Scholar
  28. Fienup, D. M., Hamelin, J., Reyes-Giordano, K., & Falcomata, T. S. (2011). College-level instruction: derived relations and programmed instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 413–416.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. *Fienup, D. M., Mylan, S. E., Brodsky, J., & Pytte, C. (2016). From the laboratory to the classroom: the effects of equivalence-based instruction on neuroanatomy competencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 143–165.Google Scholar
  30. *Fienup, D. M., Wright, N. A., & Fields, L. (2015). Optimizing equivalence-based instruction: effects of training protocols on equivalence class formation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 1–19.Google Scholar
  31. Green, G., & Saunders, R. R. (1998). Stimulus equivalence. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 229–262). New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Greville, W. J., Dymond, S., & Newton, P. M. (2016). The student experience of applied equivalence-based instruction for neuroanatomy teaching. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 13, 32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. *Hausman, N. L., Borrero, J. C., Fisher, A., & Kahng, S. (2014). Improving accuracy of portion-size estimations through a stimulus equivalence paradigm. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 485–499.Google Scholar
  34. *Hayes, L. J., Thompson, S., & Hayes, S. C. (1989). Stimulus equivalence and rule following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 275–291.Google Scholar
  35. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  36. Keller, F. S. (1968). Good-bye, teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case design technical documentation. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Document/229
  38. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. *Lovett, S., Rehfeldt, R. A., Garcia, Y., & Dunning, J. (2011). Comparison of a stimulus equivalence protocol and traditional lecture for teaching single-subject designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 819–833.Google Scholar
  40. Mace, F. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Translational research in behavior analysis: historical traditions and imperative for the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 293–312.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. *McGinty, J., Ninness, C., McCuller, G., Rumph, R., Goodwin, A., Kelso, G.,. .. Kelly, E. (2012). Training and deriving precalculus relations: a small-group, web-interactive approach. The Psychological Record, 62, 225–242.Google Scholar
  42. Michael, J. (1991). A behavioral perspective on college teaching. The Behavior Analyst, 14, 229–239.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nartey, R. K., Arntzen, E., & Fields, L. (2015). Training order and structural location of meaningful stimuli: effects of equivalence class formation. Learning & Behavior, 43, 342–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. *Ninness, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., Ford, A. M., Payne, R. ... Elliott, M. P. (2006). Transformations of mathematical and stimulus functions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 299–321.Google Scholar
  46. *Ninness, C., Dixon, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rehfeldt, R. A., Rumph, R., McCuller, G. ... McGinty, J. (2009). Constructing and deriving reciprocal trigonometric relations: a functional analytic approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 191–208.Google Scholar
  47. *O’Neill, J., Rehfeldt, R. A., Ninness, C., Munoz, B. E., & Mellor, J. (2015). Learning Skinner’s verbal operants: comparing an online stimulus equivalence procedure to an assigned reading. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 255–266.Google Scholar
  48. Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single-case research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. *Pytte, C. L., & Fienup, D. M. (2012). Using equivalence-based instruction to increase efficiency in teaching neuroanatomy. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 10, A125–A131.Google Scholar
  50. Rehfeldt, R. A. (2011). Toward a technology of derived stimulus relations: an analysis of articles published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1992–2009. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 109–119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. *Reyes-Giordano, K., & Fienup, D. M. (2015). Emergence of topographical responding following equivalence-based neuroanatomy instruction. The Psychological Record, 65, 495–507.Google Scholar
  52. *Sandoz, E. K., & Hebert, E. R. (2017). Using derived relational responding to model statistics learning across participants with varying degrees of statistics anxiety. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 18, 113–131.Google Scholar
  53. *Sella, A. C., Ribeiro, D. M., & White, G. W. (2014). Effects of an online stimulus equivalence teaching procedure on research design open-ended questions performance of international undergraduate students. The Psychological Record, 64, 89–103.Google Scholar
  54. Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: a research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  56. Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  58. Sturmey, P., Dalfen, S., & Fienup, D. M. (2015). Inter-teaching: a systematic review. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 16, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. *Trucil, L. M., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K. F., DeBar, R. M., & Schnell, L. K. (2015). Improving portion-size estimation using equivalence-based instruction. The Psychological Record, 65, 761–770.Google Scholar
  60. Varelas, A., & Fields, L. (2017). Equivalence based instruction by group based clicker training and sorting tests. The Psychological Record, 67, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. *Walker, B. D., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2012). An evaluation of the stimulus equivalence paradigm to teach single-subject design to distance education students via blackboard. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 329–344.Google Scholar
  62. *Walker, B. D., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Ninness, C. (2010). Using the stimulus equivalence paradigm to teach course material in an undergraduate rehabilitation course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 615–633.Google Scholar
  63. *Zinn, T. E., Newland, M. C., & Ritchie, K. E. (2015). The efficiency and efficacy of equivalence-based learning: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 865–882.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Queens College and the Graduate CenterCUNYNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations