Advertisement

The Internal Clock: A Manifestation of a Misguided Mechanistic View of Causation?

  • Matthew L. EckardEmail author
  • Kennon A. Lattal
Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Across various subfields within psychology, mechanistic causation is invoked regularly. When the temporal contiguity of the typical cause–effect relation is violated, mechanistic causation often assigns causal roles to mediating hypothetical constructs to account for observed effects. Two primary consequences of mechanistic causation are that 1) the proposed hypothetical constructs add what many behavior analysts consider an unnecessary step in the causal chain, and 2) these constructs then become the focus of study thereafter diverting attention from more accessible “causes.” Constructs do not contribute directly to determining the control of behavior; thus, their reification as “causes” often distracts from variables that do fulfill a causal role. In this review, these consequences are discussed in relation to theories of interval timing proposing an internal clock. Not only has this clock been said to be a cause of behavior in experiments on temporally regulated behavior, but also the clock itself has been a frequent subject of study within the timing literature. Despite descriptive accounts of this sort initially serving a heuristic function for model development, the promotion from descriptive aid to causal factor has the potential to limit much of the heuristic value that mechanistic models of causation can provide to the analysis of behavior. Problems related to construct reification are less likely to be at issue when functional relations and the processes of establishing such behavior are emphasized as alternatives to mechanistic causation alone.

Keywords

Radical behaviorism Functional relation Internal clock Mechanistic causation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the three anonymous reviewers for providing stimulating feedback on previous drafts of this manuscript. Inspiration for this manuscript came largely from discussions of behavior theory in Behavior Theory and Philosophy, a graduate course in the Department of Psychology at West Virginia University.

References

  1. Allman, M. J., Teki, S., Griffiths, T. D., & Meck, W. H. (2014). Properties of the internal clock: First- and second-order principles of subjective time. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 743–771.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachrach, A. J. (1962). Two fundamental methods of research: The formal theoretical and the informal theoretical. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.), Psychological research: An introduction (pp. 53–68). New York: Random House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20(1), 137–153.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Catania, A. C. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and psychophysical judgements: A study of some temporal properties of behavior. In W. N. Schoenfled (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  5. Chiesa, M. (1994). Radical behaviorism: The philosophy and the science. Boston: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  6. Church, R. M. (1984). Properties of the internal clock. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 566–582.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23459.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Church, R. M., & Deluty, M. Z. (1977). Bisection of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3(3), 216–228.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.3.3.216 Google Scholar
  8. Dragoi, V., Staddon, J. E. R., Palmer, R. G., & Buhusi, C. V. (2003). Interval timing as an emergent learning property. Psychological Review, 110(1), 126–144.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84(3), 279–325.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibbon, J., & Church, R. M. (1984). Sources of variance in an information processing theory of timing. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 465–488). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Grünbaum, A. (1952). Causality and the science of human behavior. American Scientist, 40, 665–676.Google Scholar
  13. Hanson, N. R. (1955). Causal chains. Mind, 64(255), 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hineline, P. N. (2004). When we speak of intentions. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 203–221). New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum.Google Scholar
  15. Jozefowiez, F., Staddon, J. E. R., & Cerutti, D. T. (2009). The behavioral economics of choice and interval timing. Psychological Review, 116, 519–539.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016171 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Killeen, P. R., & Fetterman, J. G. (1988). A behavioral theory of timing. Psychological Review, 95(2), 274–295.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mach, E. (1893). The science of mechanics: A critical and historical exposition of its principles. (T. J. McCormack, trans.). Chicago: Open Court. Google Scholar
  19. Machado, A. (1997). Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior. Psychological Review, 104, 241–265.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marr, M. J. (1993). Contextualistic mechanism or mechanistic contextualism? The straw machine as tar baby. The Behavior Analyst, 16(1), 59–65.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Matell, M. S., & Meck, W. H. (2004). Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: Coincidence detection of oscillatory processes. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 139–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meck, W. H. (1996). Neuropharmacology of timing and time perception. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(3–4), 227–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(96)00009-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meck, W. H., Penney, T. B., & Pouthas, V. (2008). Cortico-striatal representation of time in animals and humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 145–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morris, E. K. (1988). Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46(3), 289–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nevin, J. A. (1984). Quantitative analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 421–434.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Palya, W. L. (1993). Bipolar control in fixed interfood intervals. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 345–359.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Richelle, M., & Lejeune, H. (Eds.). (1980). Time in animal behavior. London, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Roberts, S., & Church, R. M. (1978). Control of an internal clock. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4(4), 318–337.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.4.4.318 Google Scholar
  29. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London, UK: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  30. Schneider, B. A. (1969). A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(5), 677–687.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-677 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Segal, E. F. (1962). Exteroceptive control of fixed-interval responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5(1), 49–57.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Skinner, B. F. (1999a). Are theories of learning necessary? In V. G. Laties & A. C. Catania (Eds.), Cumulative record: A selection of papers (4th ed.). East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Original work published 1950).Google Scholar
  34. Skinner, B. F. (1999b). The concept of the reflex in the description of behavior. In V. G. Laties & A. C. Catania (Eds.), Cumulative record: A selection of papers (4th ed.). East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Original work published 1931).Google Scholar
  35. Skinner, B. F. (1999c). Can psychology be a science of mind? In V. G. Laties & A. C. Catania (Eds.), Cumulative record: A selection of papers (4th ed.). East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Original work published 1990).Google Scholar
  36. Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock”. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 77(13), 1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). Teleology and the concepts of causation. Philosophica, 46, 17–43.Google Scholar
  38. Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations