Advancing Research Practice Partnerships to Achieve Population-Level Mental Health Outcomes
Maximizing the value of research on integrating mental health care within clinical and community settings globally requires attention to complexity, an integrated systems approach at multiple levels, and access to practice-based evidence that reflects care provided in a dynamic context. Although there has been increased emphasis on studying partnerships and understanding their role in improving the rigor and relevance of evidence in some research areas, cross-cutting work in this area remains limited. This article reflects on research-practice partnerships in three areas: dissemination and implementation research, community-based research, and health equity research. While progress has been made within these areas, each of these can contribute to the who, how, and what about mental health research to improve integration of mental health services within primary care and achieve population health outcomes.
KeywordsImplementation science Health equity Community based participatory research Global health
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The ideas presented are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants by any of the authors.
- Balazs, C. L., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2013). The three Rs: How community-based participatory research strengthens the rigor, relevance, and reach of science. Environmental Justice, 6(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
- Belone, L., Lucero, J. E., Duran, B., Tafoya, G., Baker, E. A., Chan, D., Chang, C., Greene-Moton, E., Kelley, M. A., & Wallerstein, N. (2016). Community-based participatory research conceptual model: community partner consultation and face validity. Qualitative Health Research, 26(1), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bluthenthal, R. N., Jones, L., Fackler-Lowrie, N., et al. (2006). Witness for wellness: preliminary findings from a community-academic participatory research mental health initiative. Ethnicity & Disease, 16(1 Suppl 1), S18–S34.Google Scholar
- Coronado, G. D., Vollmer, W. M., Petrik, A., Taplin, S. H., Burdick, T. E., Meenan, R. T., & Green, B. B. (2014). Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 38(2), 344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cummings, N.A., O’Donohue, W.T., Ferguson, K.E. Behavioral health as primary care: beyond efficacy to effectiveness: a report of the Third Reno Conference on the Integration of Behavioral Health in Primary Care. Paper presented at: Conference on Medical Cost Offset and Behavioral Health in Primary Care, 3rd, May, 2002, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, US; This book contains papers that were first presented at the aforementioned conference. 2003.Google Scholar
- Hanlon, C., Luitel, N. P., Kathree, T., Murhar, V., Shrivasta, S., Medhin, G., Ssebunnya, J., Fekadu, A., Shidhaye, R., Petersen, I., Jordans, M., Kigozi, F., Thornicroft, G., Patel, V., Tomlinson, M., Lund, C., Breuer, E., de Silva, M., & Prince, M. (2014). Challenges and opportunities for implementing integrated mental health care: a district level situation analysis from five low-and middle-income countries. PLoS One, 9(2), e88437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heintzman, J., Gold, R., Krist, A., Crosson, J., Likumahuwa, S., & DeVoe, J. E. (2014). Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are promising laboratories for conducting dissemination and implementation research. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 27(6), 759–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, K. E., Tachibana, C., Coronado, G. D., Dember, L. M., Glasgow, R. E., Huang, S. S., Martin, P. J., Richards, J., Rosenthal, G., Septimus, E., Simon, G. E., Solberg, L., Suls, J., Thompson, E., & Larson, E. B. (2014). A guide to research partnerships for pragmatic clinical trials. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 349(dec01 7), g6826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- PA-18-568 International Research Collaboration on Drug Abuse and Addiction Research (R01 Clinical Trial Optional). 2018.Google Scholar
- RFA-HD-12-210 NIH/PEPFAR Collaboration for Advancing Implementation Science in Prevention of Maternal-Child HIV Transmission (PMTCT) (R01). 2011.Google Scholar
- RFA-MH-12-110 Collaborative Hubs for International Research on Mental Health (U19) 2012; https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-MH-12-110.html.
- RFA-MH-17-350 Collaborative Hubs to Reduce the Burden of Suicide among American Indian and Alaska Native Youth (U19) 2016; https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-MH-17-350.html.
- Rosenthal, G. E. (2014). The role of pragmatic clinical trials in the evolution of learning health systems. Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association., 125, 204–218.Google Scholar
- Rycroft-Malone, J. Promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS). Models and Frameworks for Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Linking Evidence to Action. 2010:109–135.Google Scholar
- Warnecke, R. B., Oh, A., Breen, N., Gehlert, S., Paskett, E., Tucker, K. L., Lurie, N., Rebbeck, T., Goodwin, J., Flack, J., Srinivasan, S., Kerner, J., Heurtin-Roberts, S., Abeles, R., Tyson, F. L., Patmios, G., & Hiatt, R. A. (2008). Approaching health disparities from a population perspective: the National Institutes of Health Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities. American Journal of Public Health., 98(9), 1608–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar