Advertisement

The Men’s Story Project: Promoting Healthy Masculinities via Men’s Public, Personal Narrative-Sharing

  • Tal Peretz
  • Jocelyn LehrerEmail author
Article

Abstract

The Men’s Story Project (MSP) is a scalable social and behavior change communication initiative that fosters critical reflection and dialogue about masculinities by creating public forums where men share non-fiction, personal narratives that challenge male norms and model healthy, gender-equitable masculinities. Via focus groups and in-depth interviews, this qualitative evaluation study examined impacts of the MSP for 20 MSP presenters and 31 college audience members who attended an MSP production at a public university in California in the Spring 2009 semester. Key thematic findings for MSP presenters included value placed on the men’s group experience; having their stereotypes and prejudices challenged; empowerment and healing; reinforced commitment to cease/prevent men’s violence; and expanded gender justice engagement. For audience members, key thematic findings included gaining an expanded conceptualization of masculinity; learning about intersectionality; having their stereotypes and prejudices challenged; and finding significant overall educational and social value in the MSP. The MSP’s effects on audience members were facilitated by experiences of emotion, empathy, parafriendship and role modeling elicited by the first-person narratives, and the social learning environment fostered by the collective, public experience. Directions for further international research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

Masculinity Masculinities Narratives Testimonials Gender-based violence Intersectionality Role models 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by Award Number T32MH019105 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest Statements

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures involved in this study, which involved human participants, were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media. Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice (pp. 75–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, G., Ricardo, C., Nascimento, M., Olukoya, A., & Santos, C. (2010). Questioning gender norms with men to improve health outcomes: evidence of impact. Global Public Health, 5(5), 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bila, B., & Egrot, M. (2009). Gender asymmetry in healthcare-facility attendance of people living with HIV/AIDS in Burkina Faso. Social Science & Medicine, 69(6), 854–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casey, Erin, and Tyler Smith. (2010). “How can I not?’ Men’s pathways to involvement in anti-violence against women work. Violence Against Women 16:953-973.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: a theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1385–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dworkin, S. L. (2015). Men at risk: masculinity, heterosexuality and HIV prevention. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dworkin, S. L., Hatcher, A. M., Colvin, C., & Peacock, D. (2013). Impact of a gender-transformative HIV and antiviolence program on gender ideologies and masculinities in two rural, South African communities. Men and Masculinities, 16(2), 181–202.Google Scholar
  12. Dworkin, S. L., Treves-Kagan, S., & Lippman, S. A. (2013b). Gender-transformative interventions to reduce HIV risks and violence with heterosexually-active men: a review of the global evidence. AIDS and Behavior, 17(9), 2845–2863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-Imagery Model of Narrative Persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations (pp. 315–341). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Greig A, Abdur-Rahman A, Seyoum Alemu B. (2015). Working with men and boys to end violence against women and girls: approaches, challenges, and lessons. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
  15. Hinyard, L. J., & Kreuter, M. W. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: a conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior, 34(5), 777–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jewkes, R., Nduna, M., Levin, J., Jama, N., Dunkle, K., Puren, A., & Duvvury, N. (2008). Impact of Stepping Stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 337, a506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jewkes, R., Sikweyiya, Y., Morrell, R., & Dunkle, K. (2011). Gender inequitable masculinity and sexual entitlement in rape perpetration South Africa: findings of a cross-sectional study. PloS One, 6(12), e29590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimmel, M. S. (Ed.). (1987). Changing men: new directions in research on men and masculinity. Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  19. Lehrer, J. (2009, 2017). The Men’s Story Project: tips and guidelines for creating local productions. Washington, DC: Men’s Story ProjectGoogle Scholar
  20. Lofland, J., & Lofland, J. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth: Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
  21. Mahalik, J. R., Burns, S. M., & Syzdek, M. (2007). Masculinity and perceived normative health behaviors as predictors of men’s health behaviors. Social Science & Medicine, 64(11), 2201–2209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Messner, M. A., Greenberg, M. A., & Peretz, T. (2015). Some men: feminist allies and the movement to end violence against women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Noar, S. M. (2006). A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: where do we go from here? Journal of Health Communication, 11(1), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Noar, S. M., & Morokoff, P. J. (2002). The relationship between masculinity ideology, condom attitudes, and condom use stage of change: a structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Men’s Health, 1(1), 43–58.Google Scholar
  25. Oliffe, J. L., & Phillips, M. J. (2008). Men, depression and masculinities: a review and recommendations. Journal of Men’s Health, 5(3), 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sabo, D. (2005). The study of masculinities and men’s health. In Kimmel M. S., Hearn J, Connell R.W. (Eds.), Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities (pp 326–352). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Santana, M. C., Raj, A., Decker, M. R., La Marche, A., & Silverman, J. G. (2006). Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. Journal of Urban Health, 83(4), 575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Singhal, A., Sharma, D., Papa, M. J., & Witte, K. (2004). Air cover and ground mobilization: integrating entertainment-education broadcasts with community listening and service delivery in India. In A. Singhal et al. (Eds.), Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice (pp. 351–376). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Sociocultural Research Consultants, LLC. (2016). Dedoose Version 7.0.23. Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed-method research data. Los Angeles, CA. www.dedoose.com.
  30. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social WorkAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Bixby Center for Global Reproductive HealthUniversity of California-San Francisco WashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations