Advertisement

Lexicography

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 19–37 | Cite as

The development of Korean online dictionaries: a case study of Naver dictionary services

  • Jonghwan KimEmail author
  • Naeree Han
Original Paper

Abstract

The advances in information technology have been affecting people’s consultation behaviors and thus shaping the direction of development of Korean online dictionaries. This paper aims (1) to describe the development of Korean online dictionaries by analyzing a case study of the dictionary services of Naver, South Korea’s biggest web portal site; (2) to identify the characteristics of the online dictionary evolution; and (3) to provide primary data for further research. In order to provide background information on the evolution of Naver dictionary services, it introduces the history of Korean online dictionaries and identifies the changes in the sizes and characteristics of the audiences, which were affected by the shift from the personal computer to mobile devices. Then, the development of Naver dictionary services is examined in terms of the development phases, entry data acquisition methods, and the development of tool features. This study reveals three findings: (1) the history could be divided into three periods: the formation period (1999–2004), the growth period (2005–2009), and the expansion period (2010–now). The expansion period is characterized by the popularity of smartphones, the enlargement of dictionary services, and the emergence of mechanical translation; (2) the four main sources for entries in the dictionary services are learner dictionaries, terminological–technical dictionaries, machine-generated data such as web-crawled data and parallel texts collected from the internet, and user-participated entries; (3) most of the tool features appeared during the growth period, and they are now evolving in the direction towards appification and individualization. These findings may allow predictions about the future of Korean online dictionaries.

Keywords

Online dictionaries Mobile dictionaries Dictionary apps Machine translation Dictionary portals 

References

  1. Abel, A. 2013. Electronic dictionaries for computer assisted language learning. In Dictionaries. An international encyclopedia of lexicography. Supplementary volume: recent developments with special focus on computational lexicography, ed. R.H. Gouws, et al., 1115–1135. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  2. Bae, S., and H. Nesi. 2014. Korean and English ‘dictionary’ questions: what does the public want to know? Lexicography: Journal of ASIALEX 1(1): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Béjoint, H. 2016. Dictionaries for general users: history and development; current issues. In The oxford handbook of lexicography, ed. P. Durkin, 7–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. De Schryver, G.M. 2003. Lexicographers’ dreams in the electronic-dictionary age. International Journal of Lexicography 16(2): 143–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engelberg, S., and C. Müller-Spitzer. 2013. Dictionary portals. In Dictionaries. An international encyclopedia of lexicography. Supplementary volume: recent developments with special focus on computational lexicography, ed. R.H. Gouws, et al., 1023–1034. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  6. Gao, Y. 2013. On the appification of dictionaries: from a Chinese perspective. In Proceedings of the eLex 2013 conference (Tallinn, Estonia), 213–224.Google Scholar
  7. Hwang, Y.W. 2014. An analysis of app dictionaries: features and search functions in English app dictionaries [in Korean]. Journal of Korealex 24: 265–307.Google Scholar
  8. KoreanClick. http://www.koreanclick.com. Accessed 1st March 2016.
  9. Korean Statistical Information Service. http://kosis.kr/nsportalStats/nsportalStats_0102Body.jsp?menuId=1&NUM=1. Accessed 1st March 2016.
  10. Koyama, T., and O. Takeuch. 2003. Printed dictionaries vs. electronic dictionaries: a pilot study on how Japanese EFL learners differ in using dictionaries. Language Education and Technology 40: 61–79.Google Scholar
  11. Lew, R. 2011. Online dictionaries of English. In e-Lexicography: the internet, digital initiatives and lexicography, ed. P.A. Fuertes-Olivera, and H. Bergenholtz, 230–250. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. LINE Kamus Inggris (offline) application. Accessed 3rd March 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. http://www.msip.go.kr/web/msipContents/contents.do?mId=MTM1. Accessed 1 March 2016.
  14. Müller-Spitzer, C., and A. Koplenig. 2014. Online dictionaries: expectations and demands. In Using online dictionaries, ed. C. Müller-Spitzer, 143–188. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. NAVER English dictionary. http://endic.naver.com. Accessed 3rd March 2016.
  16. NAVER dictionary official blog. http://blog.naver.com/dic_master. Accessed 3rd March 2016.
  17. NAVER dictionary. http://dic.naver.com. Accessed 3rd March 2016.
  18. NAVER Chinese dictionary. http://cndic.naver.com. Accessed 3rd March 2016.
  19. NAVER Translate. http://translate.naver.com. Accessed 3rd March 2016.
  20. Nesi, H. 2000. Electronic dictionaries in second language vocabulary comprehension and acquisition: the state of the art. In Proceedings of the 9th EURALEX International Congress (Stuttgart, Germany), 839–847.Google Scholar
  21. Nesi, H. 2015. The demands of users and the publishing world: printed or online, free or paid for? In The oxford handbook of lexicography, ed. P. Durkin, 579–589. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Nielsen, S. 2013. The dictionaries, future of dictionaries of the future. In The bloomsbury companion to lexicography, ed. H. Jackson, 355–372. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  23. Pastor, V., and A. Alcina. 2010. Search techniques in electronic dictionaries: a classification for translators. International Journal of Lexicography 23(3): 307–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rundell, M. 2010. What future for the learner’s dictionary? In English learners’ dictionaries at the DSNA, 2009 (Tel Aviv, Islael), ed. I.J. Kerneman, and P. Bogaards, 169–175. Jerusalem: K Dictionaries.Google Scholar
  25. Svensén, B. 2009. A handbook of lexicography: the theory and practice of dictionary-making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tono, Y. 2009. Pocket electronic dictionaries in Japan: user perspectives. In Perspectives in lexicography: Asia and beyond, ed. V. Ooi, A. Pakir, I. Talib, and P. Tan, 105–115. Jerusalem: K Dictionaries.Google Scholar
  27. Tarp, S. 2009. Reflections on data access in lexicographic works. In Lexicography in the 21st century: in honour of Henning Bergenholtz, ed. S. Nielsen, and S. Tarp, 43–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tarp, S. 2012a. Theoretical challenges in the transition from lexicographical p-works to e-tools. In Electronic lexicography, ed. S. Granger, and M. Paquot, 107–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tarp, S. 2012b. Online dictionaries: today and tomorrow. Lexicographica 28(1): 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Way Back Machine. http://web.archive.org/web/19990116234516/http://dic.yahoo.co.kr. Accessed 1st March 2016.
  31. Way Back Machine. http://web.archive.org/web/19991013090952/http://dic.naver.com. Accessed 1st March 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NAVER CorporationSeongnam-siKorea
  2. 2.International Graduate School of EnglishSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations