Biomonitoring and Nonpersistent Chemicals—Understanding and Addressing Variability and Exposure Misclassification
- 25 Downloads
Purpose of Review
We offer here a review of intraindividual variability in urinary biomarkers for assessing exposure to nonpersistent chemicals. We provide thoughts on how to better evaluate exposure to nonpersistent chemicals.
We summarized reported values of intraclass correlation coefficients and found that most values fall into categories that indicate only poor to good reproducibility. Even within the “good” classification, a large percentage of study participants is likely to be misclassified as to their exposure.
There is sufficient information to support the statement that studies using only one spot measurement of a nonpersistent chemical will be unreliable. It is unequivocal that multiple samples have to be collected over a period of toxicological relevance and with consideration of exposure patterns. Sponsors of research and researchers themselves should be vocal about ensuring that sufficient resources are made available to properly characterize exposures when studying nonpersistent chemicals. Otherwise, we will continue to see an ever-growing body of literature yielding inconsistent and/or uninterpretable results.
KeywordsBiomonitoring Nonpersistent Short-lived chemical Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) Exposure Epidemiology
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 2.Patterson DG Jr, Wong LY, Turner WE, Caudill SP, Dipietro ES, McClure PC, et al. Levels in the U.S. population of those persistent organic pollutants (2003-2004) included in the Stockholm convention or in other long range transboundary air pollution agreements. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(4):1211–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Verner MA, Bachelet D, McDougall R, Charbonneau M, Guenel P, Haddad S. A case study addressing the reliability of polychlorinated biphenyl levels measured at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in representing early-life exposure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20(2):281–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Verner MA, Charbonneau M, Lopez-Carrillo L, Haddad S. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of persistent organic pollutants for lifetime exposure assessment: a new tool in breast cancer epidemiologic studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(7):886–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues, Ockleford C, Adriaanse P, Berny P, Brock T, Duquesne S, et al. Scientific Opinion of the PPR Panel on thefollow-up of thefindings of the External Scientific Report‘Literature review of epidemiological studieslinking exposure to pesticides and health effects’. EFSA Journa. 2017;15(10):5007.Google Scholar
- 18.Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 6th ed. Pacific Grove: Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2006.Google Scholar
- 22.Meeker JD, Cantonwine DE, Rivera-Gonzalez LO, Ferguson KK, Mukherjee B, Calafat AM, et al. Distribution, variability, and predictors of urinary concentrations of phenols and parabens among pregnant women in Puerto Rico. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(7):3439–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Guidry VT, Longnecker MP, Aase H, Eggesbo M, Zeiner P, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, et al. Measurement of tSotal and free urinary phenol and paraben concentrations over the course of pregnancy: assessing reliability and contamination of specimens in the Norwegian mother and child cohort study. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(7):705–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Aylward LL, Hays SM, Zidek A. Variation in urinary spot sample, 24 h samples, and longer-term average urinary concentrations of short-lived environmental chemicals: implications for exposure assessment and reverse dosimetry. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017;27(6):582–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Frederiksen H, Kranich SK, Jorgensen N, Taboureau O, Petersen JH, Andersson AM. Temporal variability in urinary phthalate metabolite excretion based on spot, morning, and 24-h urine samples: considerations for epidemiological studies. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(2):958–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Preau JL Jr, Wong LY, Silva MJ, Needham LL, Calafat AM. Variability over 1 week in the urinary concentrations of metabolites of diethyl phthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate among eight adults: an observational study. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(12):1748–54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.• Morgan MK, Nash M, Barr DB, Starr JM, Scott Clifton M, Sobus JR. Distribution, variability, and predictors of urinary bisphenol A levels in 50 North Carolina adults over a six-week monitoring period. Environ Int. 2018;112:85–99 This study collected multiple urine sample types (bedtime, morning, 24-hour), environmental samples (food, surface wipes, drinking water) and food/activity diaries over two consecutive weeks, and another week one month later. The number of samples required to obtain a reliable biomarker (ICC=0.80) was assessed for different exposure periods and sample types.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.• Perrier F, Giorgis-Allemand L, Slama R, Philippat C. Within-subject pooling of biological samples to reduce exposure misclassification in biomarker-based studies. Epidemiology. 2016;27(3):378–88 In this study, authors used simulations to assess how many samples are needed to limit attenuation bias in epidemiological studies. They also present three approaches to reduce attenuation bias in exposure-outcome associations.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 60.Morgan M, Jones P, Sobus J, Boyd Barr D. Predictors of urinary 3-Phenoxybenzoic acid levels in 50 North Carolina adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111172.