Nature-Based Social Prescribing in Urban Settings to Improve Social Connectedness and Mental Well-being: a Review
Purpose of Review
Recent reports of a “loneliness epidemic” in the USA are growing along with a robust evidence base that suggests that loneliness and social isolation can compromise physical and psychological health. Screening for social isolation among at-risk populations and referring them to nature-based community services, resources, and activities through a social prescribing (SP) program may provide a way to connect vulnerable populations with the broader community and increase their sense of connectedness and belonging. In this review, we explore opportunities for social prescribing to be used as a tool to address connectedness through nature-based interventions.
Social prescribing can include a variety of activities linked with voluntary and community sector organizations (e.g., walking and park prescriptions, community gardening, farmers’ market vouchers). These activities can promote nature contact, strengthen social structures, and improve longer term mental and physical health by activating intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental processes. The prescriptions are appropriate for reaching a range of high-risk populations including moms who are minors who are minors, recent immigrants, older adults, economically and linguistically isolated populations, and unlikely users of nature and outdoor spaces.
More research is needed to understand the impact of SPs on high-risk populations and the supports needed to allow them to feel at ease in the outdoors. Additionally, opportunities exist to develop technologically and socially innovative strategies to track patient participation in social prescriptions, monitor impact over time, and integrate prescribing into standard health care practice.
KeywordsSocial prescriptions Nature-based Social connectedness Loneliness Social isolation Psychosocial processes
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Esfahani-Smith E. The power of meaning: crafting a life that matters. New York: Crown Publishing; 2017.Google Scholar
- 4.Berkman L, Glass T. Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. 1st ed. New York, New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 391.Google Scholar
- 7.Institute of Medicine. Behavioral domains in electronic health records, phase 1. Washington DC2014.Google Scholar
- 15.Khullar D. How social isolation is killing us. New York Times 2016.Google Scholar
- 16.American Psychological Association. Social isolation, loneliness could be greater threat to public health than obesity. In: ScienceDaily. 2017. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/08/170805165319.htm.
- 24.• Zarr R, Cottrell L, Merrill C. Park prescription (DC Park Rx): a new strategy to combat chronic disease in children. J Phys Activity Health. 2017;14(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2017-0021This article outlines a feasibility study of DC Park Rx, an open-ended, digitally supported park prescription outlining expected duration, intensity, and frequency of outdoor physical activity. DC Park Rx, now Park Rx America, was one of the first park prescription applications, with health care providers in 16 states now using it. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Fenton. Health care’s blind side. The overlooked connection between social needs and good health. 2011.Google Scholar
- 36.National Institute of Mental Health. Suicide fact sheet. National Institute of Mental Health, Washington, DC. 2019. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/suicide.shtml. Accessed May 7 2019.
- 41.Kimberlee R, Jones M, Powell J. Measuring the economic impact of the wellspring healthy living centre’s social prescribing wellbeing programme for low level mental health issues encountered by GP services. Proving our Value. 2013.Google Scholar
- 43.Hale J, Knapp C, Bardwell L, Buchenau M, Marshall J, Sancar F, et al. Connecting food environments and health through the relational nature of aesthetics: gaining insight through the community gardening experience. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:1853–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.044.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 44.•• Razani N, Morshed S, Kohn MA, Wells NM, Thompson D, Alqassari M, et al. Effect of park prescriptions with and without group visits to parks on stress reduction in low-income parents: SHINE randomized trial. PloS one. 2018;13(2):e0192921 This paper reviews a first of its kind randomized trial of a park prescription, through a program called SHINE (Staying Healthy in Nature Everyday). The study compares the effect of a physician’s counseling about nature with or without facilitated group outings on stress and other outcomes among low-income parents. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Razani N, Kohn MA, Wells NM, Thompson D, Hamilton Flores H, Rutherford GW. Design and evaluation of a park prescription program for stress reduction and health promotion in low-income families: the Stay Healthy in Nature Everyday (SHINE) study protocol. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2016;51:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2016.09.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 49.Coll-Planas L, Blancafort Alias S, Tully M, Caserotti P, Giné-Garriga M, Blackburn N, et al. Exercise referral schemes enhanced by self-management strategies to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase physical activity among community-dwelling older adults from four European countries: protocol for the process evaluation of the SITLESS randomised controlled trial. BMJ open. 2019;9(6):e027073-e. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Giné-Garriga M, Coll-Planas L, Guerra M, Domingo À, Roqué M, Caserotti P, et al. The SITLESS project: exercise referral schemes enhanced by self-management strategies to battle sedentary behaviour in older adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1956-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 51.Giné-Garriga M, Roqué-Fíguls M, Coll-Planas L, Sitjà-Rabert M, Salvà A. Physical exercise interventions for improving performance-based measures of physical function in community-dwelling, frail older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(4):753–69.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Capella-González J, Braddick F, Fields H, Garcia L, Farran J. Los retos de la prescripción social en la Atención Primaria de Catalunya: la percepción de los profesionales. Publicacion Periodica del Programa de Actividades Comunitarias en Atencion Primaria. 2016;18(2):7.Google Scholar
- 54.Friedli L, Watson S. Social prescribing for mental health. Durham: Northern Centre for Mental Health; 2004.Google Scholar
- 55.Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth), University of Melbourne. Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice: a summary report. Genève: World Health Organization; 2004.Google Scholar
- 57.Mason MCK editor. Ciudades Saludables: El Impacto de Urbanismo en la Salud Publica. Conference of the Yachay Institute, Marte Democratico el Congreso de Peru, Lima; 2016; Peru.Google Scholar
- 63.Institute at the Golden Gate. A program of the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy. San Francisco, CA. 2018. https://instituteatgoldengate.org/programs/health. Accessed 06/08/19 2019.
- 71.Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge Press; 1989.Google Scholar
- 72.Wilson E. Biophilia, the human bond with other species. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1984.Google Scholar
- 73.Kellert SR, Wilson EO. The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, D.C: Island Press; 1995.Google Scholar
- 76.Alaimo K, Beavers AW, Crawford C, Snyder EH, Litt JS. Amplifying health through community gardens: a framework for advancing multicomponent, behaviorally based neighborhood interventions. Current Environmental Health Reports. 2016;3(3):302–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-016-0105-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 78.•• Izenstark D, Ebata A. The effects of the natural environment on attention and family cohesion: an experimental study. Children, Youth and Environments. 2017;27(2):93–109 This study’s results from mother-daughter dyads walking through a shopping mall and a natural setting show that the nature walk was perceived as more fun, interesting, and relaxing, and it contributed to greater cohesion between mother and daughter. The study highlights the importance of exposure to nature in families’ everyday lives and strengthens the case that active outdoor leisure activity experiences can influence and fortify social bonds. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 82.Patrick H, Williams G. Self-determination theory: its application to health behavior and complementarity with motivational interviewing. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(18):1–12.Google Scholar
- 90.Litt JS, Schmiege SJ, Hale JW, Buchenau M, Sancar F. Exploring ecological, emotional and social levers of self-rated health for urban gardeners and non-gardeners: a path analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2015;144(November):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 102.Comstock N, Dickinson M, Marshall JA, Soobader MJ, Turbin MS, Buchenau M, et al. Neighborhood attachment and its correlates: exploring neighborhood conditions, collective efficacy and gardening. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010;30:435–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 108.Carlson A. Environmental aesthetics. 1998. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-M047-1.
- 109.Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.Google Scholar
- 114.Husk K, Blockley K, Lovell R, Bethel A, Lang I, Byng R, et al. What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review. Health Soc Care Commun. 2019;0(0). https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12839.