Advertisement

Cardiovascular Effects of Indoor Air Pollution from Solid Fuel: Relevance to Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Ana Olga MocumbiEmail author
  • Simon Stewart
  • Sam Patel
  • Wael K. Al-Delaimy
Air Pollution and Health (S Adar and B Hoffmann, Section Editors)
  • 35 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Air Pollution and Health

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This research aims to summarize evidence on the cardiovascular effects of indoor air pollution (IAP) from solid fuel and identify areas for research and policy for low- and middle-income countries.

Recent Findings

IAP affects people from low socioeconomic status in Latin America, Asia, and Africa, who depend upon biomass as a fuel for cooking, heating, and lighting. In these settings, IAP disproportionately affects women, children, the elderly, and people with cardiopulmonary disease. The health effects of IAP include acute respiratory infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumoconiosis, cataract and blindness, pulmonary tuberculosis, adverse effects to pregnancy, cancer, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. New methods for assessing individual IAP exposure, exposing pathways of IAP-related cardiovascular disease, and performing qualitative research focusing on population preferences regarding strategies to reduce IAP exposure have been the most important developments in tackling the burden of IAP. Unfortunately, major disparities exist regarding research into the cardiovascular effects of IAP, with only few studies coming from sub-Saharan Africa, despite this region having the highest proportion of households using solid fuels.

Summary

Premature cardiovascular deaths and disability can be averted in low-middle income countries by addressing biomass fuel usage by the most disadvantaged settings. While research is needed to uncover the mechanisms involved in cardiovascular outcomes linked to IAP, immediate action is needed to educate the most affected populations on IAP health hazards and to reduce their exposure to this environmental risk through promoting improved housing and better ventilation, as well as increasing access to affordable clean cooking energy.

Keywords

Indoor air pollution Biomass fuel Cardiovascular diseases 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–60.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO 2016 Fact Sheet. Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health. 2016. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factssheet/fs313/en/. Accessed 12 Jan 2019.
  3. 3.
    WHO. The top 10 causes of death in the world. Fact sheet number 310. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shan J, Li HY, Liu GF, Yang X, Dong W, Jian WY, et al. Effect of air pollution on health service demand of the elderly and middle-age patients with hypertension, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases: based on analysis of data from CHARLS. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016;48(3):460–4.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The World Health Organization (WHO). 7 million premature deaths annually linked to air pollution. 25 March 2014. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/. Accessed 10 May 2019.
  6. 6.
    WHO. Fuel for life: household energy and health; 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moran-Mendoza O, Pérez-Padilla JR, Salazar-Flores M, Vazquez-Alfaro F. Wood smoke-associated lung disease: a clinical, functional, radiological and pathological description. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:1092–8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonjour S, Adair-Rohani H, Wolf J, Bruce NG, Mehta S. Pruss-Ustun et al. Solid fuel use for household cooking: country and regional estimates for 1980-2010. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:784–90.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization. Population using solid fuels (estimates): data by country. 2015. p 135. Global Health Observatory Data Repository. Available online: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.135. Accessed 12 Jan 2019.
  10. 10.
    Chafe ZA, Brauer M, Klimont Z, Van Dingenen R, Mehta S, Rao S, et al. Household cooking with solid fuels contributes to ambient PM2.5 air pollution and the burden of disease. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:314–20.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu Y, Lee K, Perez-Padilla R, Hudson NL, Mannino DM. Outdoor and indoor air pollution and COPD-related diseases in high- and low-income countries. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12(2):115–27.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brook RD, Rajagopalan S, Pope CA 3rd, Brook JR, Bhatnagar A, Diez-Roux AV, et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: an update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121(21):2331–78.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith KR, Bruce N, Balakrishnan K, Adair-Rohani H, Balmes J, Chafe Z, et al. Millions dead: how do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:185–206.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen C, Modrek S. Gendered impact of solid fuel use on acute respiratory infections in children in China. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1170.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    • Okello G, Devereux G, Semple S. Women and girls in resource poor countries experience much greater exposure to household air pollutants than men: Results from Uganda and Ethiopia. Environ Int. 2018;119:429–37 This community-based study measured personal exposure to IAP across six groups defined by age and gender (young children, young males, young females, adult males, adult females, and elderly) in rural households in two sub-Saharan African countries. It shows gender differences in exposure in two African countries with women having about two thirds of the adult female group. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clougherty JE. A growing role for gender analysis in air pollution epidemiology. Cien Saude Colet. 2011;16(4):2221–38.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bailis R, Ezzatti M, Kammen D. Health and greenhouse gas impacts of biomass and fossil fuel energy futures in Africa, Boiling Point, vol. 54. Bromely: HEDON; 2007. p. 3–8.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    IEA. Energy statistics of non-OECD countries. Paris: IEA Publications; 2004.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruce N, Perez-Padilla R, Albalak R. Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(9):1078–92.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IEA. World Energy Outlook. Paris: OECD/International Energy Agency; 2010.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Hall DO, Barnard GW, Moss P. Biomass for energy in the developing countries: current role, potential, problems, prospects. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pant KP. Cheaper fuel and higher health costs among the poor in rural Nepal. Ambio. 2012;41(3):271–83.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pahla G, Mamvura T, Ntuli F, Muzenda E. Energy densification of animal waste lignocellulose biomass and raw biomass. S Afr J Chem Eng. 2017;24:168–75.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mudway IS, Duggan ST, Venkataraman C, Habib G, Kelly FJ, Grigg J. Combustion of dried animal dung as biofuel results in the generation of highly redox active fine particulates. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2005;2:6.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sussan TE, Ingole V, Kim JH, McCormick S, Negherbon J, Fallica J, et al. Source of biomass cooking fuel determines pulmonary response to household air pollution. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014;50(3):538–48.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    World Health Organisation (2006) WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide; global update 2005. WHO, Geneva. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handl e/10665 /69477/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf?sequence. Accessed 11 Jan 2019.
  28. 28.
    Saksena STL, Smith KR. Database of household air pollution studies in developing countries, protection of the human environment. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oakes JM, Rossi PH. The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:769–84.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fotso J-C, Kuate-Defo B. Measuring socioeconomic status in health research in developing countries: should we be focusing on households, communities or both? Soc Indic Res. 2005;72:189–237.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roser M, Ritchie H. “Indoor Air Pollution”. 2018. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/indoor-air-pollution [Online Resource] https://ourworldindata.org/indoor-air-pollution. Accessed on 10th May 2019.
  32. 32.
    UNDP Human development reports [online source] accessed on January 12, 2019.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Forum Economics www.focus-economics.com. Accessed 12 Jan 2019.
  34. 34.
    van der Plas RJ, Sepp S, Pigaht M, Malalane A, Mann S, Madon G. Mozambique biomass energy strategy, Mozambique Ministry of Energy and European Union Energy Initiative Partnership Dialogue Facility, Eschborn. 2012.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Piddock KC, Gordon SB, Ngwira A, Msukwa M, Nadeau G, Davis KJ, et al. A cross-sectional study of household biomass fuel use among a periurban population in Malawi. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(6):915–24.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lamarque JF. Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application. Atmos Chem Phys. 2010;10(15):7017–39.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    UN sustainable development in Latin America and the Caribbean: follow-up to the United Nations development agenda beyond 2015 and to Rio+20. 2013 Rep.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bell ML, Cifuentes LA, Davis DL, Cushing C, Telles AG, Gouveia N. Environmental health indicators and a case study of air pollution in Latin American cities. Environ Res. 2011;111(1):57–66.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ignotti EJG, Valente KM, Longo SR, Freitas S, Hacon S, Netto PA. Impact on human health of particulate matter emitted from burnings in the Brazilian Amazon region. Rev Saude Publica. 2010;44(1):121–30.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jacobson ST, Hacon S, de Castro HA, Ignotti E, Artaxo P, Saldiva PH, et al. Acute effects of particulate matter and black carbon from seasonal fires on peak expiratory flow of schoolchildren in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e104177.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pearce JL, Aguilar-Villalobos M, Rathbun SL, Naeher LP. Residential exposures to PM2.5 and CO in Cusco, a high-altitude city in the Peruvian Andes: a pilot study. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2009;64(4):278–82.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Alexander D, Larson T, Bolton S, Vedal S. Systolic blood pressure changes in indigenous Bolivian women associated with an improved cookstove intervention. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2014;8(1):47–53.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Institute of Medicine Committee on Environmental Justice. Toward environmental justice: research, education, and health policy needs. National Academies Press (US); 1999.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Morello-Frosch R, Shenassa ED. The environmental Briskscape and social inequality: implications for explaining maternal and child health disparities. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1150–3.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    O'Neill MS, Jerrett M, Kawachi I, Levy JI, Cohen AJ, Gouveia N, et al. Workshop on air pollution and socioeconomic conditions. Health, wealth, and air pollution: advancing theory and methods. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Dec;111(16):1861–70.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    •• Hajat A, Hsia C, O'Neill MS. Socioeconomic disparities and air pollution exposure: a global review. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015;2(4):440–50 An update on environmental inequality literature by focusing on ambient criteria\air pollutants (including NOx), by evaluating studies related to inequality by socioeconomic status (as opposed to race/ethnicity) and by providing a more global perspective. Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rooney MS, Arku RE, Dionisio KL, Pacioreck C, Friedman AB, Carmichael H, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of particulate matter sources and pollution in four communities in Accra, Ghana. Sci Total Environ. 2012;435:107–14.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dionisio KL, Arku RE, Hughes AF, Vallarino J, Carmichael H, Spengler JD, et al. Air pollution in Accra neighborhoods: spatial, socioeconomic, and temporal patterns. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:2270–6.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vanker A, Barnett W, Nduru PM, Gie RP, Sly PD, Zar HJ. Home environment and indoor air pollution exposure in an African birth cohort study. Sci Total Environ. 2015;536:362–7.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Leavey A, Patel S, Martinez R, Mitroo D, Fortenberry C, Walker M, et al. Organic and inorganic speciation of particulate matter formed during different combustion phases in an improved cookstove. Environ Res. 2017;158:33–42.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hernandez-Garduno E, Brauer M, Perez-Neria J, Vedal S. Wood smoke exposure and lung adenocarcinoma in non-smoking Mexican women. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8:377–83.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hosgood HD 3rd, Wei H, Sapkota A, Choudhury I, Bruce N, Smith KR, et al. Household coal use and lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies, with an emphasis on geographic variation. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:719–28.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hosgood HD III, Boffetta P, Greenland S, Lee YCA, McLaughlin J, Seow A, et al. In-home coal and wood use and lung cancer risk: a pooled analysis of the international lung cancer consortium. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:1743–7.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    He F, Qi Q, Li X, Xiao R, Xu Q, Xiong W, et al. Association of indoor air pollution, single nucleotide polymorphism of HIF-1α gene with susceptibility to lung cancer in Han Population in Fujian Province. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2017;20(3):149–56.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lu KD, Breysse PN, Diette GB, Curtin-Brosnan J, Aloe C, Williams DL, et al. Being overweight increases susceptibility to indoor pollutants among urban children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(4):1017–23.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ellegård A. Cooking fuel smoke and respiratory symptoms among women in low-income areas in Maputo. Environ Health Perspect. 1996;104(9):980–5.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Arbex MA, Cançado JED, Pereira LAA, Braga ALF, Saldiva PHN. Biomass burning and its effects on health. J Bras Pneumol. 2004;30(2):58–175.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Brunekreef B, Dockery DW, Krzyzanowski M. Epidemiologic studies on short-term effects of low levels of major ambient air pollution components. Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103(Suppl 2):3–13.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Colao A, Muscogiuri G, Piscitelli P. Environment and health: not only cancer. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(7).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    •• Du Y, Xu X, Chu M, Guo Y, Wang J. Air particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: the epidemiological, biomedical and clinical evidence. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(1):E8–E19 This review summarizes evidence on the role of IAP as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It reviews the linking between PM exposure and the occurrence of cardiovascular disease and discussed the possible underlying mechanisms for the observed PM-induced increases in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Morakinyo OM, Mokgobu MI, Mukhola MS, Hunter RP. Health outcomes of exposure to biological and chemical components of inhalable and respirable particulate matter. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(6).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Anakwue RC, Anakwue AC. Cardiovascular disease risk profiling in Africa: environmental pollutants are not on the agenda. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2014;14(3):193–207.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Noubiap JJ, Essouma M, Bigna JJ. Targeting household air pollution for curbing the cardiovascular disease burden: a health priority in sub-Saharan Africa. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015;17(10):825–9.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stewart S, Mocumbi AO, Carrington MJ, Pretorius S, Burton R, Sliwa K. A not-so-rare form of heart failure in urban black Africans: pathways to right heart failure in the heart of Soweto study cohort. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13(10):1070–7.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Damasceno A, Mayosi BM, Sani M, Ogah OS, Mondo C, Ojji D, et al. The causes, treatment, and outcome of acute heart failure in 1006 Africans from 9 countries. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(18):1386–94.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ofori SN, Fobil JN, Odia OJ. Household biomass fuel use, blood pressure and carotid intima media thickness; a cross sectional study of rural dwelling women in southern Nigeria. Environ Pollut. 2018;242(Pt A:390–7.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Mocumbi AO, Jamal KK, Mbakwem A, Shung-King M, Sliwa K. The pan-African Society of Cardiology position paper on reproductive healthcare for women with rheumatic heart disease. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2018;29:1–10.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Phillips DIW, Osmond C, Williams ML, Jones A. Air pollution in early life and adult mortality from chronic rheumatic heart disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(4):1107–14.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    • Lagat DK, AK DL, Wellenius GA, Carter EJ, Bloomfield GS, Velazquez EJ, et al. Factors associated with isolated right heart failure in women: a pilot study from western Kenya. Glob Heart. 2014;9(2):249–54. This hospital and community-based case-control study in women from western Kenya studied isolated right heart failure including home visits to evaluate kitchen ventilation, fuel use, and cook smoke exposure time. Lower kitchen ventilation, airflow limitation, HIV infection, and occupational dust exposure were associated with IRHF.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Moussa MR, Hussein RA, El-Naggar HM. Environmental risk factors and the associated morbidity in a periurban area, Alexandria, Egypt. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2016;91(1):44–51.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    WHO—World Health Organization. Household air pollution and health [internet]. World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/. Accessed 10 May 2019.
  72. 72.
    United Nations Foundation. global alliance for clean cookstoves. http://www.unfoundation.org/what-we-do/campaigns-and-initiatives/cookstoves/?referrer=https://www.google.com/. Accessed 10 May 2019.
  73. 73.
    Putti VR, Tsan M, Mehta S, Kammila S. The state of the global clean and improved cooking sector. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2015.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Aung TW, Jain G, Sethuraman K, Baumgartner J, Reynolds C, Grieshop AP, et al. Health and climate-relevant pollutant concentrations from a carbon-finance approved cookstove intervention in rural India. Environ Sci Technol American Chemical Society. 2016;50(13):7228–38.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Mortimer K, Ndamala CB, Naunje AW, Malava J, Katundu C, Weston W, et al. A cleaner burning biomass-fuelled cookstove intervention to prevent pneumonia in children under 5 years old in rural Malawi (the cooking and pneumonia study): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London) Elsevier. 2017;389(10065):167–75.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Rosenthal J, Quinn A, Grieshop AP, Pillarisetti A, Glass RI. Clean cooking and the SDGs: integrated analytical approaches to guide energy interventions for health and environment goals. Energy Sustain Dev. 2018;42:152–9.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Smith KR, Sagar A. Making the clean available: escaping India’s Chulha trap. Energy Policy. 2014;75:410–4.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Moturi N. Risk factors for indoor air pollution in rural households in Mauche division, Molo district, Kenya. Afr Health Sci. 2010;10(3):230–4.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Olopade CO, Frank E, Bartlett E, Alexander D, Dutta A, Ibigbami T, et al. Effect of a clean stove intervention on inflammatory biomarkers in pregnant women in Ibadan, Nigeria: a randomized controlled study. Environ Int. 2017;98:181–90.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Anenberg S, Henze D, Irfan A, Kinney P, Kleiman G, Pillarisetti A. Air pollution-related health and climate benefits of clean cookstove programs in Mozambique. Environ Res Lett. 2017;12:025006.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Quansah R, Semple S, Ochieng CA, Juvekar S, Armah FA, Luginaah I, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to reduce household air pollution and/or improve health in homes using solid fuel in low-and-middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2017;103:73–90.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Pattanayak SK, Pfaff A. Behavior, environment, and health in developing countries: evaluation and valuation. Ann Rev Resour Econ. 2009;1(1):183–217.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hooper LG, Dieye Y, Ndiaye A, Diallo A, Sack CS, Fan VS, et al. Traditional cooking practices and preferences for stove features among women in rural Senegal: informing improved cookstove design and interventions. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206822.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    UN. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: UN; 2015.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Bruce N, Neufeld L, Boy E, West C. Indoor biofuel air pollution and respiratory health: the role of confounding factors among women in highland Guatemala. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(3):454–8.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Fullerton DG, Suseno A, Semple S, Kalambo F, Malamba R, White S, et al. Wood smoke exposure, poverty and impaired lung function in Malawian adults. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(3):391–8.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Keil C, Kassa H, Brown A, Kumie A, Tefera W. Inhalation exposures to particulate matter and carbon monoxide during Ethiopian coffee ceremonies in Addis Ababa: a pilot study. J Environ Public Health. 2010;2010(213960):2010.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Klasen EM, Wills B, Naithani N, Gilman RH, Tielsch JM, Chiang M, et al. Low correlation between household carbon monoxide and particulate matter concentrations from biomass-related pollution in three resource-poor settings. Environ Res. 2015;142:424–31.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    McCord AI, Stefanos SA, Tumwesige V, Lsoto D, Meding AH, Adong A, et al. The impact of biogas and fuelwood use on institutional kitchen air quality in Kampala, Uganda. Indoor Air. 2017;27(6):1067–81.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Ezzati M, Saleh H, Kammen DM. The contributions of emissions and spatial microenvironments to exposure to indoor air pollution from biomass combustion in Kenya. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(9):833–9.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Van Vliet ED, Asante K, Jack DW, Kinney PL, Whyatt RM, Chillrud SN, et al. Personal exposures to fine particulate matter and black carbon in households cooking with biomass fuels in rural Ghana. Environ Res. 2013;127:40–8.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    •• Dias D, Tchepel O. Spatial and temporal dynamics in air pollution exposure assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3). This review article discusses the concepts, key elements, current developments in assessing personal exposure to urban air pollution (72 studies reviewed) and respective advantages and disadvantages. It proposes a new conceptual structure to organize personal exposure assessment methods according to spatial-temporal variations of individuals’ activities (point-fixed or trajectory based) and characterization of air quality (variable or uniform), providing a structured basis for the intercomparing of different methodologies and to make their advantages and limitations more transparent in addressing specific research objectives. Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Bukhman G, Mocumbi AO, Horton R. Reframing NCDs and injuries for the poorest billion: a lancet commission. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1221–2.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Loo JD, Hyseni L, Ouda R, Koske S, Nyagol R, Sadumah I, et al. User perspectives of characteristics of improved cookstoves from a field evaluation in Western Kenya. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(2):167.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Falzon J, Vignati F, Halstead M, van der Linden N, Pols D. Accelerating uptake of LPG in Maputo for lower income households: study to support scoping of an intervention. 2017.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    McKague K, Wheeler D, Cash C, Comeault J, Ray E, Sprague C, et al. VidaGas: delivering better health to northern Mozambique with LPG. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. 2011;5(1):41–57.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Rosenbaum J, Derby E, Dutta K. Understanding consumer preference and willingness to pay for improved cookstoves in Bangladesh. J Health Commun. 2015;20(Suppl 1):20–7.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Fernandes AGO, de Souza-Machado C, Pinheiro GP, de Oliva ST, Mota RCL, de Lima VB, et al. Dual exposure to smoking and household air pollution is associated with an increased risk of severe asthma in adults in Brazil. Clin Transl Allergy. 2018;8:48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Olga Mocumbi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Simon Stewart
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sam Patel
    • 1
    • 4
  • Wael K. Al-Delaimy
    • 5
  1. 1.Universidade Eduardo MondlaneMaputoMozambique
  2. 2.Instituto Nacional de SaúdeMaputoMozambique
  3. 3.Hatter Institute for Cardiovascular Research in AfricaCape TownSouth Africa
  4. 4.Hospital Central de MaputoMaputoMozambique
  5. 5.University of California San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations