Information Technology & Tourism

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 83–103 | Cite as

Investigating the effectiveness of computer-produced summaries obtained from multiple travel blog entries

  • Shumpei Iinuma
  • Hidetsugu NanbaEmail author
  • Toshiyuki Takezawa
Original Research


The evolution of information and communication technology now makes it possible to collect travel information in a variety of ways. Social media content that includes blogs is one such useful information source when planning a trip. This paper proposes a method for generating a summary of multiple travel blog entries that contain images. The proposed method identifies significant sentences in addition to the images by using a graph-based approach that considers travelers’ types of behavior. To investigate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted two experiments: (1) evaluation of the quality of summaries and (2) evaluation of the effectiveness of these summaries. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method, LexRank + Image, can outperform state-of-the-art baseline methods for both evaluations. It was also confirmed that the proposed method could produce summaries containing new information not included in travel guidebooks. A system was implemented for generating summaries based on the proposed method.


Travel blog Multimedia summarization Travel information processing LexRank 


  1. Akehurst G (2009) User generated content: the use of blogs for tourism organizations and tourism consumers. J Serv Bus. 3(1):51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brin S, Page L (1998) The Anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In: Proceedings of World Wide Web conference. pp 107–117Google Scholar
  3. Csurka G, Dance CR, Fan L, Willamowski J, Bray C (2004) Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. In: Proceedings of ECCV international workshop on statistical learning in computer vision. pp 1–22Google Scholar
  4. Defays D (1977) An Efficient Algorithm for a Complete Link Method. The Computer Journal. 20(4):364–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erkan G, Radev DR (2004) LexRank: graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. J Artif Intell Res 22:457–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujii K, Nanba H, Takezawa T, Ishino A (2016) Enriching travel guidebooks with travel blog entries and archives of answered questions. In: Proceedings of ENTER 2016Google Scholar
  7. Fukushima T, Okumura M, Nanba H (2002) Text summarization challenge 2/text summarization evaluation at NTCIR workshop 3. In: Working notes of the 3rd NTCIR workshop meeting, PART V. pp 1–7Google Scholar
  8. Hao Q, Cai R, Wang C, Xiao R, Yang JM, Pang Y, Zhang L (2010) Equip tourists with knowledge mined from travelogues. In: Proceedings of World Wide Web conferenceGoogle Scholar
  9. Jonnson C, Devonish D (2008) Dose nationality, gender, and age affect travel motivation? A case of visitors to the Caribbean Island of Barbados. J Travel Tour Mark 25(3–4):398–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li YR, Wang YY (2013) Exploring the destination image of chinese tourists to taiwan by word-of-mouth on web. Proc World Acad Sci Eng Technol 7:977–981Google Scholar
  11. Lin CY (2004) ROUGE: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Proceedings of workshop on text summarization branches out, pp 74–81Google Scholar
  12. Lowe DG (1999) Objective recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer vision. pp 1150–1157Google Scholar
  13. Luhn HP (1958) The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM J Res Dev 2(2):159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mack RW, Blose JE, Pan B (2008) Believe it or not: credibility of blogs in tourism. J Vacation Mark 14(2):133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nanba H, Taguma H, Ozaki T, Kobayashi D, Ishino A, Takezawa T (2009) Automatic compilation of travel information from automatically identified travel blogs. In: Proceedings of the joint conference of the 47th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and the 4th international joint conference on natural language processing. pp 205–208Google Scholar
  16. Otterbacher J, Erkan G, Radev DR (2009) Biased LexRank: passage retrieval using random walks with question-based priors. Inf Process Manage 45(1):42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Radev DR, Jing H, Budzikowska M (2000) Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents: sentence extraction, utility-based evaluation, and user studies. Proc NAACL-ANLP Workshop on Autom summ 4:21–30Google Scholar
  18. Salton G (1971) The SMART retrieval system—experiments in automatic document processing. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  19. Wenger A (2008) Analysis of travel bloggers’ characteristics and their communication about Austria as a tourism destination. J Vacation Mark 14(2):169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu X, Li J, Neo SY (2008) Personalized multimedia web summarizer for tourist. In: Proceedings of World Wide Web conferenceGoogle Scholar
  21. Xia J, Ciesielski V, Arrowsmith C (2005) Data mining of tourists’ spatiotemporal movement patterns—a case study on Phillip Island. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on geocomputation. pp 1–5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Information SciencesHiroshima City UniversityHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations