Advertisement

New Insights of Biomarkers in IgE and Non-IgE-Mediated Drug Hypersensitivity

  • Cristobalina MayorgaEmail author
  • R. Muñoz-Cano
  • A. Rodríguez-Nogales
  • R. Fernandez-Santamaría
  • T. D. Fernandez
Drug Allergy (C Mayorga, Section Editor)
  • 8 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Drug Allergy

Abstract

Background Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) occurring less than 6 h after the drug intake are named immediate reactions. They include allergic reactions, and pseudo-allergic or non-allergic reactions, and despite their similar clinical manifestations, the underlying mechanism is different. Its identification is essential for their management. In IgE-mediated-DHRs, the best biomarker is drug-specific IgE, which can be determined by in vivo and in vitro tests. Identifying the culprit drug is critical for the design of avoidance strategies and the recommendation of safe alternatives for future treatments.

Recent findings It has been suggested the existence of other mechanisms beyond IgE and related with the drug interaction with MRGPRX2 or IgG receptors, or mediated by their effect on some enzymes. However, the lack of a clear biomarker for characterizing them, together with the difficulty of predicting cross-reactivity, makes the management of non-allergic reactions very complex.

Desensitization is standard intervention in allergic patients who need the drug. It is successful in IgE-mediated DHRs but its value on non-IgE-mediated DHRs is not well-known.

Summary Further research is needed to identify the mechanism involved in DHRs considering that IgE and non-allergic reactions cannot be mutually exclusive and can happen simultaneously, increasing their severity. It is crucial the identification of biomarkers in non-allergic reactions.

Keywords

Drug Hypersensitivity IgE Basophil Mast cells Anaphylaxis 

Notes

Funding

The present study has been supported by Institute of Health “Carlos III” of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grants cofunded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): PI15/01206, PI16/00696 and RETICS ARADYAL RD16/0006/0001, RD16/0006/0007; Andalusian Regional Ministry Health (grant: PI-0241-2016). CM holds a “Nicolas Monardes” research contract by Andalusian Regional Ministry Health: C-0044-2012 SAS 2013. RM-C is a recipient of a Juan Rodes fellowship (Carlos II Health Institute JR16/00016). TDF holds a “Ramon y Cajal” research contract from Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (RYC-2013-13138).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Cristobalina Mayorga, R. Muñoz-Cano, A. Rodríguez-Nogales, R. Fernandez-Santamaría, and T. D. Fernandez declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    •• Pichler WJ, Hausmann O. Classification of drug hypersensitivity into allergic, p-i, and pseudo-allergic forms. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2016;171:166–79 A proposal of a new drug hypersensitivity reactions subclassification (beyond type A and B), combining time of appearance, phenotype/symptoms, possible immune pathomechanism, to obtain the mode of action involved in the specific DHR. Following this criteria, the authors suggest a new classification in allergic, pharmacological interaction with immune receptors (p-i ) and pseudoallergic reactions.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bircher AJ, Scherer HK. Drug hypersensitivity reactions: inconsistency in the use of the classification of immediate and nonimmediate reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:263–4 author reply 265-266.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    •• Torres MJ, Salas M, Ariza A, et al. Understanding the mechanisms in accelerated drug reactions. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;16:308–14 A review of the proposed mechanisms of accelerated urticarial and exanthematous reactions (between 1 and 24 h after drug exposure). The few works studying the underlyng mechanism suggest that most of these reactions are mediated by T cells, similar to those appearing in delayed reactions. However, an IgE-mediated mechanism cannot be ruled out, especially for some urticarial reactions, although literature shows that is not frequent.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ariza A, Mayorga C, Fernandez TD, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactams: relevance of hapten-protein conjugates. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015;25:12–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levine BB. Immunologic mechanisms of penicillin allergy. A haptenic model system for the study of allergic diseases of man. N Engl J Med. 1966;275:1115–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Landsteiner K, Jacobs J. Studies on the sensitization of animals with simple chemical compounds. J Exp Med. 1935;61:643–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin SF, Esser PR, Schmucker S, et al. T-cell recognition of chemicals, protein allergens and drugs: towards the development of in vitro assays. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67:4171–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    • Ariza A, Mayorga C, Salas M, et al. The influence of the carrier molecule on amoxicillin recognition by specific IgE in patients with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to betalactams. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35113 A review of the proposed mechanisms of accelerated urticarial and exanthematous reactions (between 1 and 24 h after drug exposure). The few works studying the underlying mechansism suggest that most of these reactions are mediated by T cells, similar to those appearing in delayed reactions. However, an IgE-mediated mechanism cannot be ruled out, especially for some urticarial reactions, although literature shows that is not frequent.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mayorga C, Obispo T, Jimeno L, et al. Epitope mapping of beta-lactam antibiotics with the use of monoclonal antibodies. Toxicology. 1995;97:225–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    MacGlashan D Jr. Expression of CD203c and CD63 in human basophils: relationship to differential regulation of piecemeal and anaphylactic degranulation processes. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40:1365–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacGlashan D Jr. Marked differences in the signaling requirements for expression of CD203c and CD11b versus CD63 expression and histamine release in human basophils. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;159:243–52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacGlashan DW Jr. Basophil activation testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132:777–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    •• Fernandez TD, Ariza A, Palomares F, et al. Hypersensitivity to fluoroquinolones: the expression of basophil activation markers depends on the clinical entity and the culprit fluoroquinolone. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e3679 In this study, two different basophil activation markers where compared, CD203c or CD63 in patients with fluorquinolone allergy. In patients allergic to moxifloxacin with anaphylactic shock, an increase in CD203c expression was observed, whereas patients with anaphylaxis preferentially upregulate CD63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ben Said B, Berard F, Bienvenu J, et al. Usefulness of basophil activation tests for the diagnosis of IgE-mediated allergy to quinolones. Allergy. 2010;65:535–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aranda A, Mayorga C, Ariza A, et al. In vitro evaluation of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to quinolones. Allergy. 2011;66:247–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laguna JJ, Bogas G, Salas M, et al. The basophil activation test can be of value for diagnosing immediate allergic reactions to omeprazole. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;8:1628–36e2.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mertes PM, Alla F, Tréchot P, et al. Anaphylaxis during anesthesia in France: an 8-year national survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128:366–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Torres MJ, Blanca M. The complex clinical picture of beta-lactam hypersensitivity: penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, carbapenems, and clavams. Med Clin North Am. 2010;94:805–20 xii.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Antunez C, Fernandez T, Blanca-Lopez N, et al. IgE antibodies to betalactams: relationship between the triggering hapten and the specificity of the immune response. Allergy. 2006;61:940–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gomez E, Blanca-Lopez N, Torres MJ, et al. Immunoglobulin E-mediated immediate allergic reactions to dipyrone: value of basophil activation test in the identification of patients. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39:1217–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iwamoto T, Hirai H, Yamaguchi N, et al. Carboplatin-induced severe hypersensitivity reaction: role of IgE-dependent basophil activation and FcepsilonRI. Cancer Sci. 2014;105:1472–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Demoly P, Kropf R, Bircher A, et al. Drug hypersensitivity: questionnaire. EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity. Allergy. 1999;54:999–1003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Torres MJ, Mayorga C, Leyva L, et al. Controlled administration of penicillin to patients with a positive history but negative skin and specific serum IgE tests. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32:270–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blanca M, Romano A, Torres MJ, et al. Update on the evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to betalactams. Allergy. 2009;64:183–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Romano A, Warrington R. Antibiotic allergy. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2014;34:489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    •• Mayorga C, Celik G, Rouzaire P, et al. In vitro tests for drug hypersensitivity reactions: an ENDA/EAACI drug allergy interest group position paper. Allergy. 2016;71:1103–34 Extensive review of the current evidence regarding in vitro testing in drug allergy and recommendations of the ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dona I, Moreno E, Perez-Sanchez N, et al. Update on quinolone allergy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017;17:56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aberer W, Bircher A, Romano A, et al. Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations. Allergy. 2003;58:854–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dona I, Torres MJ, Montanez MI, et al. In vitro diagnostic testing for antibiotic allergy. Allergy, Asthma Immunol Res. 2017;9:288–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sanz ML, Gamboa PM, Antepara I, et al. Flow cytometric basophil activation test by detection of CD63 expression in patients with immediate-type reactions to betalactam antibiotics. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32:277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Torres MJ, Padial A, Mayorga C, et al. The diagnostic interpretation of basophil activation test in immediate allergic reactions to betalactams. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34:1768–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    De Week AL, Sanz ML, Gamboa PM, et al. Diagnosis of immediate-type beta-lactam allergy in vitro by flow-cytometric basophil activation test and sulfidoleukotriene production: a multicenter study. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2009;19:91–109.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    •• Salas M, Fernandez-Santamaria R, Mayorga C, et al. Use of the basophil activation test may reduce the need for drug provocation in amoxicillin-clavulanic allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6:1010–1018 e1012 This original article establishes the high positive predictive value of basophil activation test to clavulanic acid for evaluating patients with IgE-mediated reactions to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for which no other in vitro test is available. Additionaly, it shows its potential value as a complementary tool to the other in vivo tests included in the allergological work-up.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Torres MJ, Ariza A, Mayorga C, et al. Clavulanic acid can be the component in amoxicillin-clavulanic acid responsible for immediate hypersensitivity reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:502–505 e502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Giavina-Bianchi P, Galvao VR, Picard M, et al. Basophil activation test is a relevant biomarker of the outcome of rapid desensitization in platinum compounds-allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5:728–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    •• Iwamoto T, Okamoto A, Ishinaga H, et al. A novel approach to predict cetuximab-induced hypersensitivity reaction: detection of drug-specific IgE on basophils. Cancer Med. 2016;5:1004–12 This article demonstrated by using different approaches that cetuximab hypersensitivity is induced by a specific IgE mechanism and that the IgE-cetuximab interaction on basophils may be key to predict severe cetuximab reactions.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Iwamoto T, Yuta A, Tabata T, et al. Evaluation of basophil CD203c as a predictor of carboplatin-related hypersensitivity reaction in patients with gynecologic cancer. Biol Pharm Bull. 2012;35:1487–95.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pineda F, Ariza A, Mayorga C, et al. Role of histamine release test for the evaluation of patients with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to clavulanic acid. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2015;168:233–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gaudenzio N, Sibilano R, Marichal T, et al. Different activation signals induce distinct mast cell degranulation strategies. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:3981–98.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fernandez TD, Torres MJ, Blanca-Lopez N, et al. Negativization rates of IgE radioimmunoassay and basophil activation test in immediate reactions to penicillins. Allergy. 2009;64:242–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ariza A, Garcia-Martin E, Salas M, et al. Pyrazolones metabolites are relevant for identifying selective anaphylaxis to metamizole. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23845.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Antunez C, Blanca-Lopez N, Torres MJ, et al. Immediate allergic reactions to cephalosporins: evaluation of cross-reactivity with a panel of penicillins and cephalosporins. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:404–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Romano A, Gaeta F, Valluzzi RL, et al. Cross-reactivity and tolerability of aztreonam and cephalosporins in subjects with a T cell-mediated hypersensitivity to penicillins. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138:179–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Romano A, Guéant-Rodriguez R-M, Viola M, et al. Cross-reactivity and tolerability of cephalosporins in patients with immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:16–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Romano A, Mayorga C, Torres MJ, et al. Immediate allergic reactions to cephalosporins: cross-reactivity and selective responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:1177–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ebo DG, Bridts CH, Hagendorens MM, et al. Basophil activation test by flow cytometry: present and future applications in allergology. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2008;74:201–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ebo DG, Bridts CH, Hagendorens MM, et al. Flow-assisted diagnostic management of anaphylaxis from rocuronium bromide. Allergy. 2006;61:935–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ebo DG, Leysen J, Mayorga C, et al. The in vitro diagnosis of drug allergy: status and perspectives. Allergy. 2011;66:1275–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Uyttebroek AP, Sabato V, Leysen J, et al. Flowcytometric diagnosis of atracurium-induced anaphylaxis. Allergy. 2014;69:1324–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kowalski ML, Stevenson DD. Classification of reactions to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2013;33:135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    •• McNeil BD, Pundir P, Meeker S, et al. Identification of a mast-cell-specific receptor crucial for pseudo-allergic drug reactions. Nature. 2015;519:237–41 This is an important original article which determines that MRGPRX2 are targets of many small-molecule drugs associated with systemic pseudo-allergic, or anaphylactoid, reactions. They demonstrate that drug involved in anaphylactoid responses such as fluoroquinolones and neuromuscular blocking agents interact with this receptor inducing mast cell degranulation. Moreover, these drugs share a common chemical motif with compounds that interact with this receptor, which may help predict side effects of other compounds.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Subramanian H, Gupta K, Ali H. Roles of Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 on mast cell-mediated host defense, pseudoallergic drug reactions, and chronic inflammatory diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138:700–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lieberman P, Garvey LH. Mast cells and anaphylaxis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016;16:20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    •• Navines-Ferrer A, Serrano-Candelas E, Lafuente A, et al. MRGPRX2-mediated mast cell response to drugs used in perioperative procedures and anaesthesia. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11628 This study shows that vancomycin and morphin induce mast cell activation through the novel mast cell receptor MRGPRX2. Indeed, the authors show how the sera of a group of patients reciving some of these drugs and obtained during the acute reaction, is also able to induce mast cell activation through this receptor.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Atkinson TP, Kaliner MA. Anaphylaxis. Med Clin North Am. 1992;76:841–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    •• Spoerl D, Nigolian H, Czarnetzki C, et al. Reclassifying anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents based on the presumed patho-mechanism: IgE-mediated, pharmacological adverse reaction or "innate hypersensitivity"? Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061223.A review of the literature (neuromuscular blocking agents) and a propousal of a new classfication for drug hypersensitivity reactions based on their physiopathological mechanism.
  57. 57.
    Kamohara M, Matsuo A, Takasaki J, et al. Identification of MrgX2 as a human G-protein-coupled receptor for proadrenomedullin N-terminal peptides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;330:1146–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Falcone FH, Wan D, Barwary N, et al. RBL cells as models for in vitro studies of mast cells and basophils. Immunol Rev. 2018;282:47–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sabato V, Van Gasse A, Cop N, et al. The Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor MRGPRX2 is expressed on human basophils and up-regulated upon activation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139:AB168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jonsson F, Mancardi DA, Zhao W, et al. Human FcgammaRIIA induces anaphylactic and allergic reactions. Blood. 2012;119:2533–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Finkelman FD, Khodoun MV, Strait R. Human IgE-independent systemic anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:1674–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Munoz-Cano R, Picado C, Valero A, et al. Mechanisms of anaphylaxis beyond IgE. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2016;26:73–82 quiz 72p following 83.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    •• Munoz-Cano R, Pascal M, Araujo G, et al. Mechanisms, cofactors, and augmenting factors involved in anaphylaxis. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1193 This review indicates that although mast cells and basophils as key players in human anaphylaxis, alternative mechanisms with neutrophils and macrophages with IgG-dependent, complement, and contact system activation may also been implicated.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Munoz-Cano R, Pascal M, Bartra J, et al. Distinct transcriptome profiles differentiate nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-dependent from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-independent food-induced anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:137–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Stafforini DM. Biology of platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH, lipoprotein associated phospholipase A2). Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2009;23:73–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Vadas P, Gold M, Perelman B, et al. Platelet-activating factor, PAF acetylhydrolase, and severe anaphylaxis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:28–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Brown SG, Stone SF, Fatovich DM, et al. Anaphylaxis: clinical patterns, mediator release, and severity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132:1141–1149 e1145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Vassallo RR. Review: IgA anaphylactic transfusion reactions. Part I. Laboratory diagnosis, incidence, and supply of IgA-deficient products. Immunohematology. 2004;20:226–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Schmidt AP, Taswell HF, Gleich GJ. Anaphylactic transfusion reactions associated with anti-IgA antibody. N Engl J Med. 1969;280:188–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Steenholdt C, Svenson M, Bendtzen K, et al. Acute and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to infliximab and adalimumab in a patient with Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2012;6:108–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cheifetz A, Smedley M, Martin S, et al. The incidence and management of infusion reactions to infliximab: a large center experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1315–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Vultaggio A, Matucci A, Nencini F, et al. Anti-infliximab IgE and non-IgE antibodies and induction of infusion-related severe anaphylactic reactions. Allergy. 2010;65:657–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Umeda Y, Fukumoto Y, Miyauchi T, et al. Anaphylactic shock related to aprotinin induced by anti-aprotinin immunoglobulin G antibody alone; report of a case. Kyobu Geka. 2007;60:69–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bergamaschini L, Mannucci PM, Federici AB, et al. Posttransfusion anaphylactic reactions in a patient with severe von Willebrand disease: role of complement and alloantibodies to von Willebrand factor. J Lab Clin Med. 1995;125:348–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Neiser S, Koskenkorva TS, Schwarz K, et al. Assessment of dextran antigenicity of intravenous iron preparations with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(7).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17071185.
  76. 76.
    van der Heijden J, Geissler J, van Mirre E, et al. A novel splice variant of FcgammaRIIa: a risk factor for anaphylaxis in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:1408–1416 e1405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Miele E, Markowitz JE, Mamula P, et al. Human antichimeric antibody in children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease receiving infliximab. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;38:502–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Mota I, Gaspar A, Benito-Garcia F, et al. Drug-induced anaphylaxis: seven-year single-center survey. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;50:211–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ayuso P, Blanca-Lopez N, Dona I, et al. Advanced phenotyping in hypersensitivity drug reactions to NSAIDs. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43:1097–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kowalski ML, Asero R, Bavbek S, et al. Classification and practical approach to the diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Allergy. 2013;68:1219–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Perez-Sanchez N, Bogas G, Cornejo-Garcia JA, et al. Multiple nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity without hypersensitivity to aspirin. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4:524–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Dona I, Barrionuevo E, Blanca-Lopez N, et al. Trends in hypersensitivity drug reactions: more drugs, more response patterns, more heterogeneity. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014;24:143–53 quiz 141 p following 153.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Dona I, Barrionuevo E, Salas M, et al. Natural evolution in patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced urticaria/angioedema. Allergy. 2017;72:1346–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Roberts LJ, Morrow JD. Analgesic, antipyretic and inflammatory agents and drugs employed in the treatment of gout. In: Brunton L, Chabner BA, Knollman B, editors. Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. Tenth: McGraw-Hill Education; 2001. p. 689–731.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Szczeklik A, Gryglewski RJ, Czerniawska-Mysik G. Relationship of inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis by analgesics to asthma attacks in aspirin-sensitive patients. Br Med J. 1975;1:67–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Machado-Carvalho L, Roca-Ferrer J, Picado C. Prostaglandin E2 receptors in asthma and in chronic rhinosinusitis/nasal polyps with and without aspirin hypersensitivity. Respir Res. 2014;15:100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Kowalski ML, Makowska JS, Blanca M, et al. Hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) - classification, diagnosis and management: review of the EAACI/ENDA(#) and GA2LEN/HANNA*. Allergy. 2011;66:818–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Castells M. Diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in precision medicine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140:321–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    •• de Las Vecillas Sanchez L, Alenazy LA, Garcia-Neuer M, et al. Drug hypersensitivity and desensitizations: mechanisms and new approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061316..An extensive review aimed to summarize up-to-date information on the drug hypersensitivity reactions, the IgE-mediated mechanisms of desensitization, and their clinical applications.
  90. 90.
    Fajt ML, Petrov AA. Outpatient aspirin desensitization for patients with aspirin hypersensitivity and cardiac disease. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011;10:17–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Fruth K, Pogorzelski B, Schmidtmann I, et al. Low-dose aspirin desensitization in individuals with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. Allergy. 2013;68:659–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristobalina Mayorga
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • R. Muñoz-Cano
    • 4
    • 5
  • A. Rodríguez-Nogales
    • 1
  • R. Fernandez-Santamaría
    • 1
  • T. D. Fernandez
    • 1
  1. 1.Allergy Research GroupInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA. ARADyAL. Hospital CivilMálagaSpain
  2. 2.Allergy UnitHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga. ARADyAL Hospital CivilMálagaSpain
  3. 3.Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology-BIONANDMálagaSpain
  4. 4.Allergy Section, Neumology Department, Hospital Clinic, ARADyALUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  5. 5.Clinical and Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy (IRCE)August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations