Advertisement

Specialty Infant Formulas for Milk Allergy: Current Choices and Unmet Needs

  • Yvan Vandenplas
  • Sophie Nutten
Food Allergy (M Fernández-Rivas, Section Editor)
  • 11 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Food Allergy

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Literature on the different options for the management of cow’s milk allergy (CMA) was reviewed. Literature was searched using databases to find original papers and reviews on this topic.

Recent Findings

Amino acid based infant formula (AAF) is the most effective dietary treatment of CMA. However, because of the high cost, guidelines recommend extensively hydrolyzed formula (eHF) with a clinical proof of efficacy as the first choice option. In many parts of the world, rice hydrolysates are an alternative option. Soy infant formula can sometimes still be considered, in the absence of more suitable products. Yet, about 10 to 15% of infants allergic to cow milk will also react to soy. Thickened eHF and AAF may be helpful in infants presenting also with troublesome regurgitation. Partially hydrolyzed formula or infant formula with intact protein from other animals is no option. Finally, oral immune therapy is indicated in some children with persistent CMA.

Summary

eHF remains the first option for the treatment of most patients with CMA. Recent data on induction of oral tolerance in CMA infants are interesting and deserve further research.

Keywords

Cow milk (protein) allergy Extensively hydrolyzed formula Amino acid formula 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Y Vandenplas has participated as a clinical investigator, and/or advisory board member, and/or consultant, and/or speaker for Abbott Nutrition, Biocodex, CHR Hansen, Danone, Nestle Health Science, Nestle Nutrition Institute, Nutricia, Mead Johnson Nutrition, Schär, United Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth. S Nutten is a Nestec Ltd. employee.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Mallol J, Solé D, Aguirre V, Chong H, Rosario N, García-Marcos L, et al. Changes in the prevalence and severity of recurrent wheezing in infants: the results of two surveys administered 7 years apart. J Asthma. 2017;12:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sicherer SH. Epidemiology of food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:594–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koletzko S, Niggemann B, Arato A, Dias JA, Heuschkel R, Husby S, et al. Diagnostic approach and management of cow’s-milk protein allergy in infants and children: ESPGHAN GI Committee practical guidelines. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55:221–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nwaru BI, Hickstein L, Panesar SS, Roberts G, Muraro A, Sheikh A, et al. Prevalence of common food allergies in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2014;69:992–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    • Schoemaker AA, Sprikkelman AB, Grimshaw KE, Roberts G, Grabenhenrich L, Rosenfeld L, et al. Incidence and natural history of challenge-proven cow’s milk allergy in European children—EuroPrevall birth cohort. Allergy. 2015;70:963–72 Epidemiologic data on cow’s milk allergy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spergel JM. Nonimmunoglobulin e-mediated immune reactions to foods. Allergy, Asthma Clin Immunol. 2006;2:78–85.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fiocchi A, Brozek J, Schünemann H, World Allergy Organization (WAO). Diagnosis and rationale for action against cow’s milk allergy (DRACMA) guidelines. World Allergy Organ J. 2010;3:157–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vandenplas Y, Koletzko S, Isolauri E, Brueton M, Dupont C, Hill D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cow’s milk protein allergy in infants. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:902–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vandenplas Y. Prevention and management of cow’s milk allergy in non-exclusively breastfed infants. Nutrients. 2017;9:E731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lucendo AJ, Arias Á, González-Cervera J, Mota-Huertas T, Yagüe-Compadre JL. Tolerance of a cow’s milk-based hydrolyzed formula in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis triggered by milk. Allergy. 2013;68:1065–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muraro A, Halken S, Arshad SH, Beyer K, Dubois AE, Du Toit G, et al. EAACI food allergy and anaphylaxis guidelines. Primary prevention of food allergy. Allergy. 2014;69:590–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    • Kiewiet MB, Gros M, van Neerven RJ, Faas MM, de Vos P. Immunomodulating properties of protein hydrolysates for application in cow’s milk allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2015;26:206–17 The effects of extensive protein hydrolysates on the immune system. This paper highlights the differences between hydrolysates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agostoni C, Terracciano L, Varin E, Fiocchi A. The nutritional value of protein-hydrolysed formulae. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56:65–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    • Gonzalez Ballesteros LF, Ma NS, Gordon RJ, Ward L, Backeljauw P, Wasserman H, et al. Unexpected widespread hypophosphatemia and bone disease associated with elemental formula use in infants and children. Bone. 2017;97:287–92 The nutritional properties of formulas for the treatment of cow milk allergy differ, and because of differences in bioavailablity some may be related to nutritional deficiencies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lambers TT, Gloerich J, van Hoffen E, Alkema W, Hondmann DH, van Tol EA. Clustering analyses in peptidomics revealed that peptide profiles of infant formulae are descriptive. Food Sci Nutr. 2015;3:81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chauveau A, Nguyen-Grosjean VM, JacquenetS RC, Mouton-Faivre C. Immediate hypersensitivity to extensively hydrolyzed formulas: an important reminder. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016;27:541–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Greer FR, Sicherer SH, Burks AW, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition; American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Allergy and Immunology. Effects of early nutritional interventions on the development of atopic disease in infants and children: the role of maternal dietary restriction, breastfeeding, timing of introduction of complementary foods, and hydrolyzed formulas. Pediatrics. 2008;121:183–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luyt D, Ball H, Makwana N, Green MR, Bravin K, Nasser SM, et al. BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of cow’s milk allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44:642–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knol EF. Requirements for effective IgE cross-linking on mast cells and basophils. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2006;50:620–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huby RD, Dearman RJ, Kimber I. Why are some proteins allergens? Toxicol Sci. 2000;55:235–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    • Niggemann B, Nies H, Renz H, Herz U, Wahn U. Sensitizing capacity and residual allergenicity of hydrolyzed cow’s milk formulae: results from a murine model. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2001;125:316–21 The differences between hydrolysates are highlighted. Each hydrolysate has different properties.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fritsché R. Utility of animal models for evaluating hypoallergenicity. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009;53:979–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iwamoto H, Matsubara T, Nakazato Y, Namba K, Takeda Y. Evaluation of the antigenicity of hydrolyzed cow’s milk protein formulas using the mouse basophil activation test. Toxicol Lett. 2016;242:53–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knipping K, Simons PJ, Buelens-Sleumer LS, Cox L, den Hartog M, de Jong N, et al. Development of β-lactoglobulin-specific chimeric human IgEκ monoclonal antibodies for in vitro safety assessment of whey hydrolysates. PLoS One. 2014;9:e106025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pedrosa M, Pascual CY, Larco JI, Esteban MM. Palatability of hydrolysates and Other substitution formulas for cow’s milk-allergic children: a comparative study of taste, smell, and texture evaluated by healthy volunteers. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006;16:351–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rapp M, Martin-Paschoud C, Nutten S, Blanchard C, Panchaud A, Jarvi A, et al. Characterization of an extensively hydrolyzed whey infant formula with a low bitterness. Clin Transl Allergy. 2013;3(Suppl 3):P132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vandenplas Y, De Greef E, ALLAR study group. Extensive protein hydrolysate formula effectively reduces regurgitation in infants with positive and negative challenge tests for cow’s milk allergy. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:e243–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dupont C, Kalach N, Soulaines P, Bradatan E, Lachaux A, Payot F, et al. A thickened amino-acid formula in infants with cow’s milk allergy failing to respond to protein hydrolysate formulas: a randomized double-blind trial. Paediatr Drugs. 2014;16:513–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosen R, Vandenplas Y, Singendonk M, Cabana M, DiLorenzo C, Gottrand F, et al. Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;66:516–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Farahmand F, Najafi M, Ataee P, Modarresi V, Shahraki T, Rezaei N. Cow’s milk allergy among children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut Liver. 2011;5:298–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vandenplas Y, De Greef E, Hauser B, Paradice Study Group. Safety and tolerance of a new extensively hydrolyzed rice protein-based formula in the management of infants with cow’s milk protein allergy. Eur J Pediatr. 2014;173:1209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fiocchi A, Travaini M, D’Auria E, Banderali G, Bernardo L, Riva E. Tolerance to a rice hydrolysate formula in children allergic to cow’s milk and soy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003;33:1576–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fiocchi A, Dahda L, Dupont C, Campoy C, Fierro V, Nieto A. Cow’s milk allergy: towards an update of DRACMA guidelines. World Allergy Organ J. 2016;9:35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hojsak I, Braegger C, Bronsky J, Campoy C, Colomb V, Decsi T, et al. Arsenic in rice: a cause for concern. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60:142–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dinsdale EC, Ward WE. Early exposure to soy isoflavones and effects on reproductive health: a review of human and animal studies. Nutrients. 2010;2:1156–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bhatia J, Greer F, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Use of soy protein-based formulas in infant feeding. Pediatrics. 2008;121:1062–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Katz Y, Gutierrez-Castrellon P, González MG, Rivas R, Lee BW, Alarcon P. A comprehensive review of sensitization and allergy to soy-based products. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014;46:272–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Giampietro PG, Kjellman NI, Oldaeus G, Wouters-Wesseling W, Businco L. Hypoallergenicity of an extensively hydrolyzed whey formula. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2001;12:83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vandenplas Y, Cruchet S, Faure C, Lee H, Di Lorenzo C, Staiano A, et al. When should we use partially hydrolysed formulae for frequent gastrointestinal symptoms and allergy prevention? Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:689–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ah-Leung S, Bernard H, Bidat E, Paty E, Rancé F, Scheinmann P, et al. Allergy to goat and sheep milk without allergy to cow’s milk. Allergy. 2006;61:1358–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Katz Y, Goldberg MR, Zadik-Mnuhin G, Leshno M, Heyman E. Cross-sensitization between milk proteins: reactivity to a “kosher” epitope? Isr Med Assoc J. 2008;10:85–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Businco L, Giampietro PG, Lucenti P, Lucaroni F, Pini C, Di Felice G, et al. Allergenicity of mare’s milk in children with cow’s milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;105:1031–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vincenzetti S, Foghini L, Pucciarelli S, Polzonetti V, Cammertoni N, Beghelli D, et al. Hypoallergenic properties of donkey’s milk: a preliminary study. Vet Ital. 2014;50:99–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vita D, Passalacqua G, Di Pasquale G, Caminiti L, Crisafulli G, Rulli I, et al. Ass’s milk in children with atopic dermatitis and cow’s milk allergy: crossover comparison with goat’s milk. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007;18:594–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mori F, Sarti L, Barni S, Pucci N, Belli F, Stagi S, et al. Donkey’s milk is well accepted and tolerated by infants with cow’s milk food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: a preliminary study. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2017;27:269–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Loss G, Apprich S, Waser M, Kneifel W, Genuneit J, Büchele G, et al. The protective effect of farm milk consumption on childhood asthma and atopy: the GABRIELA study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128:766–73.e4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    • Miceli Sopo S, Greco M, Monaco S, Bianchi A, Cuomo B, Liotti L, et al. Matrix effect on baked milk tolerance in children with IgE cow milk allergy. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2016;44:517–23 Tolerance to milk protein depends on teh way the milk is presented: tolerances to cooked/baked milk may be larger than tolerance to liquid milk.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dang TD, Peters RL, Allen KJ. Debates in allergy medicine: baked egg and milk do not accelerate tolerance to egg and milk. World Allergy Organ J. 2016;9:2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Leung J, Hundal NV, Katz AJ, Shreffler WG, Yuan Q, Butterworth CA, et al. Tolerance of baked milk in patients with cow’s milk-mediated eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132:1215–6.e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    • Bunyavanich S, Shen N, Grishin A, Wood R, Burks W, Dawson P, et al. Early-life gut microbiome composition and milk allergy resolution. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138:1122–30 The relation between the first colonization and the development of allergy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Yadava K, Sichelstiel AK, Sprenger N, Ngom-Bru C, et al. Gut microbiota metabolism of dietary fiber influences allergic airway disease and hematopoiesis. Nat Med. 2014;20(2):159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vandenplas Y, Steenhout P, Planoudis Y, Grathwohl D, Althera Study Group. Treating cow’s milk protein allergy: a double-blind randomized trial comparing two extensively hydrolysed formulas with probiotics. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:990–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Berni Canani R, Di Costanzo M, Bedogni G, Amoroso A, Cosenza L, Di Scala C, et al. Extensively hydrolyzed casein formula containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reduces the occurrence of other allergic manifestations in children with cow’s milk allergy: 3-year randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139:1906–1913.e4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Grüber C, Wendt M, Sulser C, Lau S, Kulig M, Wahn U, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as treatment of atopic dermatitis in infancy. Allergy. 2007;62:1270–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Baldassarre ME, Laforgia N, Fanelli M, Laneve A, Grosso R, Lifschitz C. Lactobacillus GG improves recovery in infants with blood in the stools and presumptive allergic colitis compared with extensively hydrolyzed formula alone. J Pediatr. 2010;156:397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Koletzko S. Probiotics and prebiotics for prevention of food allergy: indications and recommendations by societies and institutions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;63(Suppl 1):S9–S10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Francavilla R, Calasso M, Calace L, Siragusa S, Ndagijimana M, Vernocchi P, et al. Effect of lactose on gut microbiota and metabolome of infants with cow’s milk allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012;23:420–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    • Tordesillas L, Berin MC. Mechanisms of oral tolerance. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-018-8680-5Interesting review on the induction of tolerance.
  59. 59.
    •• Mowat AM. To respond or not to respond - a personal perspective of intestinal tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:405–15 Interesting review on the induction of tolerance.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Reche M, Pascual C, Fiandor A, Polanco I, Rivero-Urgell M, Chifre R, et al. The effect of a partially hydrolysed formula based on rice protein in the treatment of infants with cow’s milk protein allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010;21:577–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Terracciano L, Bouygue GR, Sarratud T, Veglia F, Martelli A, Fiocchi A. Impact of dietary regimen on the duration of cow’s milk allergy: a random allocation study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40:637–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Martinolli F, Carraro S, Berardi M, Ferraro V, Baraldi E, Zanconato S. Immunotherapy for food allergies in children. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:906–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Taniuchi S, Takahashi M, Soejima K, Hatano Y, Minami H. Immunotherapy for cow’s milk allergy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13:2443–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Nadeau KC, Schneider LC, Hoyte L, Borras I, Umetsu DT. Rapid oral desensitization in combination with omalizumab therapy in patients with cow’s milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:1622–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wood RA. Advances in food allergy in 2015. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138:1541–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Takahashi M, Taniuchi S, Soejima K, Hatano Y, Yamanouchi S, Kaneko K. Successful desensitization in a boy with severe cow’s milk allergy by a combination therapy using omalizumab and rush oral immunotherapy. Allergy, Asthma Clin Immunol. 2015;11:18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Goldberg MR, Nachshon L, Appel MY, Elizur A, Levy MB, Eisenberg E, et al. Efficacy of baked milk oral immunotherapy in baked milk-reactive allergic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136:1601–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bloom KA, Huang FR, Bencharitiwong R, Bardina L, Ross A, Sampson HA, et al. Effect of heat treatment on milk and egg proteins allergenicity. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2014;25:740–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Dupont C, Kalach N, Soulaines P, Legoué-Morillon S, Piloquet H, Benhamou PH. Cow’s milk epicutaneous immunotherapy in children: a pilot trial of safety, acceptability, and impact on allergic reactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:1165–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Keet CA, Frischmeyer-Guerrerio PA, Thyagarajan A, Schroeder JT, Hamilton RG, Boden S, et al. The safety and efficacy of sublingual and oral immunotherapy for milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:448–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Bedoret D, Singh AK, Shaw V, Hoyte EG, Hamilton R, De Kruyff RH, et al. Changes in antigen-specific T cell number and function during oral desensitization in cow’s milk allergy enabled with omalizumab. Mucosal Immunol. 2012;5:267–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Varshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kemper A, Steele P, et al. A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:654–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Syed A, Garcia MA, Lyu SC, Bucayu R, Kohli A, Ishida S, et al. Peanut oral immunotherapy results in increased antigen-induced regulatory T-cell function and hypomethylation of forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:500–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hol J, van Leer EH, Elink Schuurman BE, de Ruiter LF, Samsom JN, Hop W, et al. The acquisition of tolerance toward cow’s milk through probiotic supplementation: a randomized, controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121:1448–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Berni Canani R, Nocerino R, Terrin G, Coruzzo A, Cosenza L, Leone L, et al. Effect of extensively hydrolyzed casein formula supplemented with Lactobacillus GG on tolerance acquisition in infants with cow’s milk allergy: a randomized trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:580–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Berni Canani R, Sangwan N, Stefka AT, Nocerino R, Paparo L, Aitoro R, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-supplemented formula expands butyrate-producing bacterial strains in food allergic infants. ISME J. 2016;10:742–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Harvey BM, Langford JE, Harthoorn LF, Gillman SA, Green TD, Schwartz RH, et al. Effects on growth and tolerance and hypoallergenicity of an amino acid-based formula with synbiotics. Pediatr Res. 2014;75:343–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Candy DCA, Van Ampting MTJ, Oude Nijhuis MM, Wopereis H, Butt AM, Peroni DG, et al. A synbiotic-containing amino-acid-based formula improves gut microbiota in non-IgE-mediated allergic infants. Pediatr Res. 2018;83:677–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KidZ Health CastleUZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Gastrointestinal HealthNestlé Research CenterLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations