Needs of persons with dementia and their family caregivers in dementia cafés

  • Chie FukuiEmail author
  • Mahiro Fujisaki-Sueda-Sakai
  • Nobutada Yokouchi
  • Yuka Sumikawa
  • Fumika Horinuki
  • Ayako Baba
  • Makoto Suto
  • Hiroko Okada
  • Ryogo Ogino
  • Hyosook Park
  • Junichiro Okata
Original Article


Background and aims

Several studies have shown the effectiveness and diversity of dementia cafés, whereas there are few published articles in academic research focusing on what persons with dementia and their family caregivers need and whether the services provided satisfy their needs. This study aimed to identify the needs of persons with dementia and their family caregivers participating in dementia cafés in Japan.


Interviews and participant observations were conducted in nine dementia cafés. Study participants were persons with dementia, their caregivers, and the staff in dementia cafés. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results and discussion

A total of 24 participants were recruited. Needs for persons with dementia were subdivided into five categories: to express their feelings about their current condition; to be accommodated through consideration of their physical and cognitive status; for changes in their health conditions to be noticed; to enjoy entertainment; and to keep in touch with others inside and outside of the dementia café. Needs for family caregivers were subdivided into four subcategories: to express their feelings such as anxiety and guilt and complaints regarding caregiving; to consult about difficulties in daily life; to listen to other family caregivers’ experiences; and to keep in touch with others inside and outside of the dementia café. The needs of persons with dementia and family caregivers differ partly.


Dementia cafés should create programmes and comfortable environments answering to the differences of their needs.


Expectation Informal service Japan Qualitative study Requirement 



The authors express their gratitude to all the participants interviewed who were willing to talk about their thoughts and experiences, and to the administrators who accepted and cooperated with this study. This study was financially supported by GLAFS. GLAFS is a graduate programme in gerontology at the University of Tokyo.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were accodance with the ethical approval.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Tokyo (No. 16-188).

Informed consent

All participants gave written or oral informed consent.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (2017) Dementia. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  2. 2.
    Cabinet Office (2016) Annual report on the aging society: 2016. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  3. 3.
    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2016) Long-term care insurance system of Japan. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  4. 4.
    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2017) The status of implementation of dementia café. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  5. 5.
    Miesen BL, Jones GMM (2004) The Alzheimer café concept: a response to the trauma, drama and tragedy of dementia. In: Jones GMM, Miesen BL (eds) Caregiving in dementia: research and applications, vol 3. Brunner Routledge, London, pp 307–333Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alzheimer’s Society (2017) Dementia connect.!/search. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  7. 7.
    Alzheimer’s café and memory café (2017) Starting your own Alzheimer’s or memory café. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  8. 8.
    Dementia Australia (2017) Memory lane café. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  9. 9.
    Centers of Dementia Café Research and Practices (2017) A survey report on dementia café in Japan. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  10. 10.
    Capus J (2005) The Kingston dementia café: the benefits of establishing an Alzheimer café for carers and persons with dementia. Dementia 4:588–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dementia Australia (2017) Community café toolkit. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  12. 12.
    Light D, Delves J (2011) A guide to setting up a memory café. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  13. 13.
    Alzheimer café in UK (2010) Summary of the 33 Alzheimer café quality control criteria. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  14. 14.
    McFadden S, Koll A (2014) Popular memory cafés in Wisconsin’s Fox Valley battle social isolation. Generations 38:68–71Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dow B, Haralambous B, Hempton C et al (2011) Evaluation of Alzheimer’s Australia Vic memory lane cafés. Int Psychogeriatr 23:246–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mather L (2006) Memory lane café: follow-up support for persons with early stage dementia and their families and carers. Dementia 5:290–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morrissey MV (2006) Rethinking the benefits of an adapted version of “Alzheimer cafés” for individuals with Alzheimer’s and their partners. Int J Psychiatr Nurs Res 12:1393–1401Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Halley E, Boulton R, Mcfadzean D et al (2005) The Poppy café: a multi-agency approach to developing an Alzheimer café. Dementia 4:592–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mai JE (2016) Looking for information: a survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. Emerald Group Publishing, Wagga WaggaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19: 349–357. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mayring P (2000) Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual Soc Res 1(2):Art. 20. Accessed 9 Jan 2019
  22. 22.
    Pearce A, Clare L, Pistrang N (2002) Managing sense of self: coping in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia 1:173–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pratt R, Wilkinson H (2003) A psychosocial model of understanding the experience of receiving a diagnosis of dementia. Dementia 2:181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Husband HJ (2000) Diagnostic disclosure in dementia: an opportunity for intervention? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 15:544–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laakkonen ML, Raivio MM, Eloniemi-Sulkava U et al (2008) How do elderly spouse care givers of people with Alzheimer disease experience the disclosure of dementia diagnosis and subsequent care? J Med Ethics 34:427–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prorok JC, Horgan S, Seitz DP (2013) Health care experiences of people with dementia and their caregivers: a meta-ethnographic analysis of qualitative studies. Can Med Assoc J 185:E669–E680. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Loukissa D, Farran CJ, Graham KL (1999) Caring for a relative with Alzheimer’s disease: the experience of African-American and Caucasian caregivers. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement 14:207–216Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Georges J, Gove D (2007) Disclosing a diagnosis: the Alzheimer Europe view. J Dement Care 15:28Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Greenwood N, Smith R, Akhtar F et al (2017) A qualitative study of carers’ experiences of dementia cafés: a place to feel supported and be yourself. BMC Geriatr 17:164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carpenter B, Dave J (2004) Disclosing a dementia diagnosis: a review of opinion and practice, and a proposed research agenda. Gerontologist 44:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Takechi H, Sugihara Y, Matsumoto H et al (2018) A dementia café as a bridgehead for community-inclusive care: qualitative analysis of observations by on-the-job training participants in a dementia café. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 46:128–139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Akhtar F, Greenwood N, Smith R et al (2017) Dementia cafés: recommendations from interviews with informal carers. Work Older People 21:236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chie Fukui
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mahiro Fujisaki-Sueda-Sakai
    • 2
    • 10
  • Nobutada Yokouchi
    • 3
  • Yuka Sumikawa
    • 2
  • Fumika Horinuki
    • 4
  • Ayako Baba
    • 5
  • Makoto Suto
    • 6
  • Hiroko Okada
    • 7
  • Ryogo Ogino
    • 10
  • Hyosook Park
    • 8
    • 10
  • Junichiro Okata
    • 9
    • 10
  1. 1.Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Department of Family Nursing, Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Department of Community Health Nursing, Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Departments of Health and Social Behaviour, Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-Term Care Nursing/Palliative Care Nursing, Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Division of Clinical Psychology, Developmental Sciences, Department of Integrated Educational Sciences, Graduate School of EducationUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  6. 6.Division of Lifelong Learning Infrastructure Management Course, Social Sciences in Education, Department of Integrated Educational Sciences, Graduate School of EducationUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  7. 7.Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Department of Health Communication, Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  8. 8.Department of Labour Law, Graduate School of Law and PoliticsUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  9. 9.Department of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  10. 10.Institute of GerontologyUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations