Developing more efficient, effective, and disseminable treatments for eating disorders: an overview of the multiphase optimization strategy Review First Online: 02 January 2019 Abstract
The present manuscript describes the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and its potential applications to treatments for eating disorders (EDs). The manuscript describes the three phases of MOST, discusses a hypothetical case example of how MOST could be applied to developing a disseminable ED treatment, and reviews the pros and cons of the MOST approach. Outcomes from treatments for EDs leave room for improvement. However, traditional methods of treatment development and evaluation (i.e., the treatment package approach) make it challenging to determine how best to improve ED treatments. For example, testing full treatment packages in open trials and RCTs without systematic testing of each component is inefficient (as it is unknown which components are effective), and often does not provide concrete future directions for optimization of the treatment. Much stands to be gained by optimizing treatments in the early stages before testing them in open trials or RCTs. MOST is an alternative, engineering-inspired research framework that is well-suited to address the issues of inefficiency associated with the treatment package approach. MOST entails identifying the most promising treatment components for inclusion in interventions, then eliminating or deemphasizing less efficacious/inert components. This strategy results in a treatment comprised of only effective components that can then be tested via RCT. Though the MOST approach has limitations, it has the potential to greatly benefit ED treatment research and is worthy of application in the field.
Keywords Eating disorders Experimental design Factorial design Treatment development Treatment evaluation Treatment efficacy Notes Compliance with ethical standards Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
No ethical approval was necessary for this review manuscript.
No informed consent was necessary for this study as no human subjects were enrolled.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Keel PK, Brown TA (2010) Update on course and outcome in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 43(3):195–204.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20810 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Wilson GT, Grilo CM, Vitousek KM (2007) Psychological treatment of eating disorders. Am Psychol 62(3):199–216.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.3.199 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Linardon J (2018) Rates of abstinence following psychological or behavioral treatments for binge-eating disorder: meta-analysis. Int J Eat Disord.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22897 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Linardon J, Wade TD (2018) How many individuals achieve symptom abstinence following psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa? A meta-analytic review. Int J Eat Disord 51(4):287–294.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22838 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Linardon J et al (2017) The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 85(11):1080.
https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000245 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Stuhldreher N et al (2012) Cost-of-illness studies and cost-effectiveness analyses in eating disorders: a systematic review. Int J Eat Disord 45(4):476–491.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20977 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Collins LM et al (2005) A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med 30(1):65–73.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3001_8 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Practice APTFoE-B (2006) Evidence-based practice in psychology. Am Psychol 61(4):271–285.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271 CrossRef Google Scholar
Begg C et al (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276(8):637–639.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2005.12.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V (2007) The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) and the Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med 32(5):S112–S118.
. Suppl 1 : .
CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
NIH (2017) Innovative research methods: prevention and management of symptoms in chronic Illness (R21).
. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
Pellegrini CA et al (2014) Optimization of remotely delivered intensive lifestyle treatment for obesity using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy: opt-IN study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials 201438(2):251–259.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2014.05.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
Czajkowski SM et al (2015) From ideas to efficacy: the ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol 34(10):971–982.
https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000161 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Tomarken AJ, Waller NG (2005) Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 1:31–65.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kraemer HC et al (2002) Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59(10):877–883.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Linardon J, X de la P Garcia, Brennan L (2017) Predictors, moderators, and mediators of treatment outcome following manualised cognitive-behavioural therapy for eating disorders: a systematic review. Eur Eating Disord Rev 25(1):3–12.
https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2492 CrossRef Google Scholar
Vall E, Wade TD (2015) Predictors of treatment outcome in individuals with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Eat Disord 48(7):946–971.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22411 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Brown A, Mountford V, Waller G (2013) Therapeutic alliance and weight gain during cognitive behavioural therapy for anorexia nervosa. Behav Res Ther 51(4–5):216–220.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2013.01.008 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Graves TA et al (2017) A meta-analysis of the relation between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 50(4):323–340.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22672 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Haslam M, Meyer C, Waller G (2011) Do eating attitudes predict early change in eating behaviors among women with bulimic disorders who are treated with cognitive behavioral therapy? Int J Eat Disord 44(8):741–744.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20910 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lockwood R, Serpell L, Waller G (2012) Moderators of weight gain in the early stages of outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 45(1):51–56.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20885 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Marcoulides OK, Waller G (2012) Nonspecific predictors of weight gain in the early stages of outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with anorexia nervosa: replication and extension. Int J Eat Disord 45(6):746–750.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22014 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Waller G (2016) Treatment protocols for eating disorders: clinicians’ attitudes, concerns, adherence and difficulties delivering evidence-based psychological interventions. Curr Psychiatry Rep.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0679-0 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Waller G, Corstorphine E, Mountford V (2007) The role of emotional abuse in the eating disorders: implications for treatment. Eating Disord J Treat Prev 15(4):317–331.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260701454337 CrossRef Google Scholar
Waller G, Evans J, Stringer H (2012) The therapeutic alliance in the early part of cognitive-behavioral therapy for the eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 45(1):63–69.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20914 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Fichter MM, Quadflieg N, Rehm J (2003) Predicting the outcome of eating disorders using structural equation modeling. Int J Eat Disord 34(3):292–313.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10193 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Tasca GA, Lampard AM (2012) Reciprocal influence of alliance to the group and outcome in day treatment for eating disorders. J Counsel Psychol 59(4):507.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029947 CrossRef Google Scholar
Spangler DL, Baldwin SA, Agras WS (2004) An examination of the mechanisms of action in cognitive behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa. Behav Ther 35(3):537–560.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80031-5 CrossRef Google Scholar
Wonderlich SA et al (2014) A randomized controlled comparison of integrative cognitive-affective therapy (ICAT) and enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-E) for bulimia nervosa. Psychol Med 44(3):543–553.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001098 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Collins LM et al (2011) The multiphase optimization strategy for engineering effective tobacco use interventions. Ann Behav Med 41(2):208–226.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9253-x CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Dziak JJ, Nahum-Shani I (2016) Three-level modeling for factorial experiments with experimentally induced clustering. Penn State Methodology Center. Optimizing behavioral interventions.
. Accessed 2 Feb 2017
Penn State Methodology Center (2016) Optimizing behavioral interventions.
. Accessed 2 Feb 2017
Baker TB et al (2011) New methods for tobacco dependence treatment research. Ann Behav Med 41(2):192–207.
CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Insel T et al (2010) Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry 167(7):748–751.
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Chorpita BF, Daleiden EL, Weisz JR (2005) Identifying and selecting the common elements of evidence based interventions: a distillation and matching model. Ment Health Serv Res 7(1):5–20.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11020-005-1962-6 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Chorpita BF, Daleiden EL (2009) Mapping evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: application of the distillation and matching model to 615 treatments from 322 randomized trials. J Consul Clin Psychol 77(3):566.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014565 CrossRef Google Scholar
Schlam TR et al (2016) Comparative effectiveness of intervention components for producing long-term abstinence from smoking: a factorial screening experiment. Addiction 111(1):142–155.
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13153 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Pellegrini CA et al (2015) Corrigendum to “Optimization of remotely delivered intensive lifestyle treatment for obesity using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy: Opt-IN study protocol”. Contemp Clin Trials 45(Pt B):468–469.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.001 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Baker TB et al (2017) Implementing clinical research using factorial designs: a primer. Behav Ther.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.12.005 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Collins L, Kugler K, Gwadz M (2016) Optimization of multicomponent behavioral and biobehavioral interventions for the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS. AIDS Behav 20:197–214.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1145-4 CrossRef PubMedCentral Google Scholar
DuBois RH et al (2017) A network analysis investigation of the cognitive-behavioral theory of eating disorders. Behav Res Ther 97:213–221.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.08.004 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Engel SG et al (2013) The role of affect in the maintenance of anorexia nervosa: evidence from a naturalistic assessment of momentary behaviors and emotion. J Abnorm Psychol 122(3):709–719.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034010 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Mallorquí-Bagué N et al (2018) Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic feature among eating disorders: cross-sectional and longitudinal approach: emotion regulation and eating disorders. Eur Eating Disord Rev 26(1):53–61.
https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2570 CrossRef Google Scholar
Collins LM, Dziak JJ, Li R (2009) Design of experiments with multiple independent variables: A resource management perspective on complete and reduced factorial designs. Psychol Methods 14(3):202–224.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015826 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Kugler K et al (2012) Effect coding versus dummy coding in analysis of data from factorial experiments. Technical Report
Collins LM et al (2014) Evaluating individual intervention components: making decisions based on the results of a factorial screening experiment. Transl Behav Med 4(3):238–251.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-013-0239-7 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019