Interactive role of weight status and fat talk on body dissatisfaction: an observation of women friends
- 134 Downloads
The current study examined the interactive role of weight status and fat talk on body dissatisfaction among women friends.
Sixty pairs of women friends completed a measure of body dissatisfaction and engaged in an observed fat talk interaction with their friend.
Women’s weight status was related to their own, but not their friend’s, body dissatisfaction. Observed fat talk was significantly related to individuals’ own and their friend’s body dissatisfaction. A significant interaction effect showed that the association between fat talk and body dissatisfaction was minimal for women with higher weight status. In contrast, fat talk was associated with more body dissatisfaction for women with lower weight status.
These findings suggest the importance of examining the conjoint effect of personal (e.g., weight status) and contextual (e.g., fat talk) factors on body image issues.
Level of evidence
V, cross-sectional descriptive study.
KeywordsWeight Body dissatisfaction Fat talk Friends Actor–partner interdependence model Moderation
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Nichter M, Vuckovic N (1994) Fat talk: body image among adolescent girls. In: Sault N (ed) Many mirrors: body image and social relations. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, pp 109–131Google Scholar
- 7.Webb JB, Rogers CB, Etzel L, Padro MP (2018) “Mom, quit fat talking—I’m trying to eat (mindfully) here!”: evaluating a sociocultural model of family fat talk, positive body image, and mindful eating in college women. Appetite 126:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Nichter M (2000) Fat talk: what girls and their parents say about dieting. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 17.Tiggemann M (2001) Person × situation interactions in body dissatisfaction. Int J Eat Disord 29:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(200101)29:1%3C65::AID-EAT10%3E3.0.CO;2-Y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Chow CM, Ruhl H, Tan CC, Ellis L (2017) Fear of fat and restrained eating: negative body talk between female friends as a moderator. Eat Weight Disord 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-017-0459-9
- 22.Garner DM, Olmstead MP, Polivy J (1983) Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Int J Eat Disord 2:15–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(198321)2:2%3C15::AID-EAT2260020203%3E3.0.CO;2-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL (2006) Dyadic analysis. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 26.Team RC (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2018) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-137. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
- 28.Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 38.Lee GY, Park EJ, Kim Y-R, Kwag KH, Park JH, An SH, Lee JH, Sim JH, Treasure J (2017) Feasibility and acceptability of a prevention program for eating disorders (me, you and us) adapted for young adolescents in Korea. Eat Weight Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-017-0436-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar