Although it is well documented that women evaluate their own body differently from other bodies, it remains unclear whether this discrepancy is based on double standards because of identity or on objective differences between these bodies. The aim of this study was therefore to test whether women apply double standards depending on a body’s identity when evaluating the same bodies presented with different faces. Average-weight women (N = 104) rated body attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass of thin, average-weight, overweight, athletic, and hypermuscular bodies with either another female’s face or their own face. With their own face, subjects rated overweight bodies as more unattractive, higher in body fat and lower in muscle mass than with another female’s face. However, for non-overweight bodies, body ratings did not differ depending on body identity. Based on the self-deprecating double standards for overweight bodies, a body-related identity bias might be considered in theoretical models of body image.
Level of evidence Level V, descriptive study.
Body evaluation Body attractiveness Identity Body image Self-deprecating bias Double standards
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
The local ethics committee of the University Osnabrück stipulated that data must not be passed on to third parties. Therefore, data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Jacobi C, Hayward C, De Zwaan M, Kraemer HC, Agras WS (2004) Coming to terms with risk factors for eating disorders: application of risk terminology and suggestions for a general taxonomy. Psychol Bull 130:19–65. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson JK, Heinberg LJ, Altabe M, Tantleff-Dunn S (1999) Exacting beauty: theory, assessment and treatment of body image disturbance. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. doi:10.1037/10312-000
Van Den Berg P, Thompson JK, Obremski-Brandon K, Coovert M (2002) The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance. A covariance structure modeling investigation testing the mediational role of appearance comparison. J Psychosom Res 53:1007–1020. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00499-3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Berg KC, Peterson CB, Frazier P, Crow SJ (2012) Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination-questionnaire: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord 45:428–438. doi:10.1002/eat.20931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper JL, Wade TD (2015) The relationship between memory and interpretation biases, difficulties with emotion regulation, and disordered eating in young women. Cognit Ther Res 39:853–862. doi:10.1007/s10608-015-9709-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar