Advertisement

Double standards in body evaluation? The influence of identification with body stimuli on ratings of attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass

  • Mona M. VogesEmail author
  • Claire-Marie Giabbiconi
  • Benjamin Schöne
  • Manuel Waldorf
  • Andrea S. Hartmann
  • Silja Vocks
Original Article

Abstract

Although it is well documented that women evaluate their own body differently from other bodies, it remains unclear whether this discrepancy is based on double standards because of identity or on objective differences between these bodies. The aim of this study was therefore to test whether women apply double standards depending on a body’s identity when evaluating the same bodies presented with different faces. Average-weight women (N = 104) rated body attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass of thin, average-weight, overweight, athletic, and hypermuscular bodies with either another female’s face or their own face. With their own face, subjects rated overweight bodies as more unattractive, higher in body fat and lower in muscle mass than with another female’s face. However, for non-overweight bodies, body ratings did not differ depending on body identity. Based on the self-deprecating double standards for overweight bodies, a body-related identity bias might be considered in theoretical models of body image.

Level of evidence Level V, descriptive study.

Keywords

Body evaluation Body attractiveness Identity Body image Self-deprecating bias Double standards 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data availability

The local ethics committee of the University Osnabrück stipulated that data must not be passed on to third parties. Therefore, data sharing is not applicable to this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Coker E, Abraham S (2014) Body weight dissatisfaction: a comparison of women with and without eating disorders. Eat Behav 15:453–459. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.06.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacobi C, Hayward C, De Zwaan M, Kraemer HC, Agras WS (2004) Coming to terms with risk factors for eating disorders: application of risk terminology and suggestions for a general taxonomy. Psychol Bull 130:19–65. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thompson JK, Heinberg LJ, Altabe M, Tantleff-Dunn S (1999) Exacting beauty: theory, assessment and treatment of body image disturbance. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1037/10312-000
  4. 4.
    Van Den Berg P, Thompson JK, Obremski-Brandon K, Coovert M (2002) The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance. A covariance structure modeling investigation testing the mediational role of appearance comparison. J Psychosom Res 53:1007–1020. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00499-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Myers TA, Crowther JH (2009) Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: a meta-analytic review. J Abnorm Psychol 118:683–698. doi: 10.1037/a0016763 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leahey TM, Crowther JH, Ciesla JA (2011) An ecological momentary assessment of the effects of weight and shape social comparisons on women with eating pathology, high body dissatisfaction, and low body dissatisfaction. Behav Ther 42:197–210. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.07.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donaghue N, Smith N (2008) Not half bad: self and others’ judgements of body size and attractiveness across the life span. Sex Roles 58:875–882. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9408-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alleva J, Jansen A, Martijn C, Schepers J, Nederkoorn C (2013) Get your own mirror. Investigating how strict eating disordered women are in judging the bodies of other eating disordered women. Appetite 68:98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.04.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jansen A, Smeets T, Martijn C, Nederkoorn C (2006) I see what you see: the lack of a self-serving body-image bias in eating disorders. Br J Clin Psychol 45:123–135. doi: 10.1348/014466505X50167 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foschi M (2000) Double standards for compentence: theory and research. Annu Rev Sociol 26:21–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deutsch FM, Zalenski CM, Clark ME (1986) Is there a double standard of aging? J Appl Soc Psychol 16:771–785. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01167.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sniderman PM, Piazza T, Tetlock PE, Kendrick A (1991) The new racism. Am J Pol Sci 35:423–447. doi: 10.2307/2111369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hönekopp J (2006) Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32:199–209. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.199 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smeets MAM (1999) Body size categorization in anorexia nervosa using a morphing instrument.Int J Eat Disord 25:451–455. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199905)25:4<451::AID-EAT10>3.0.CO;2-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fairburn CG, Cooper Z (1993) The eating disorder examination. In: Fairburn CG, Wilson GT (eds) Binge eating: nature, assessment, and treatment, 12th edn. Guilford, New York, pp 317–360Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hilbert A, Tuschen-Caffier B, Karwautz A, Niederhofer H, Munsch S (2007) Eating disorder examination–questionnaire: psychometric properties of the german version. Diagnostica 53:144–154. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.53.3.144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berg KC, Peterson CB, Frazier P, Crow SJ (2012) Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination-questionnaire: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord 45:428–438. doi: 10.1002/eat.20931 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Devue C, Bredart S (2011) The neural correlates of visual self-recognition. Conscious Cogn 20:40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ebner NC (2008) Age of face matters: age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces. Behav Res Methods 40:130–136. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.1.130 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Minear M, Park DC (2004) A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36:630–633. doi: 10.3758/BF03206543 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lakens D (2013) Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol 4:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williamson DA, White MA, York-Crowe E, Stewart TM (2004) Cognitive-behavioral theories of eating disorders. Behav Modif 28:711–738. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259853 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cooper JL, Wade TD (2015) The relationship between memory and interpretation biases, difficulties with emotion regulation, and disordered eating in young women. Cognit Ther Res 39:853–862. doi: 10.1007/s10608-015-9709-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Puhl R, Heuer C (2009) The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 17:941–964. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.636 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mona M. Voges
    • 1
    Email author
  • Claire-Marie Giabbiconi
    • 1
  • Benjamin Schöne
    • 2
  • Manuel Waldorf
    • 1
  • Andrea S. Hartmann
    • 1
  • Silja Vocks
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Psychology and PsychotherapyOsnabrück UniversityOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.Department of Experimental Psychology IOsnabrück UniversityOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations