Advertisement

Gender Equity and Mainstreaming in Renewable Energy Policies—Empowering Women in the Energy Value Chain in the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)

  • Monica Maduekwe
  • Ellen Morris
  • Jennye Greene
  • Victoria HealeyEmail author
Regional Renewable Energy – Africa (D Arent and N Lee, Section Editors)
  • 33 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Regional Renewable Energy - Africa

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Using practice theories as the analytical framework, this paper assesses the potential of the Economic Community of West African States’ (ECOWAS) first ever regional policy on Gender Mainstreaming in Energy Access to produce the desired behavioral changes envisioned.

Recent Findings

The policy came to fruition after a multi-year, multi-stakeholder effort of research, advocacy, and consensus building; all spearheaded by an institution of the community, the ECOWAS Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (ECREEE). The success of the ECOWAS policy has led to the development of a related regional level legal instrument, monitoring protocols, institutional evolutions, as well as replication efforts in other African regions.

Summary

The policy’s provisions were aimed at changing the mind-sets and, eventually, behaviors of people concerned and were designed in order to increase its chances of successful implementation; however, the onus lies on the constituent governments of the community to provide incentives for its full and effective implementation in order to guarantee its success.

Keywords

Gender-responsive energy policies Women’s empowerment ECOWAS Energy access Gender equality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The article discusses the work done by the ECOWAS Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (ECREEE) and ECOWAS in general as it concerns the development of the ECOWAS Policy for Gender Mainstreaming in Energy Access.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Monica Maduekwe works with ECREEE and was the staff member responsible for the development of the ECOWAS Policy discussed in the paper.

Ellen Morris, Jennye Greene, and Victoria Healey each declares no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    ECOWAS Treaty- Revised. (1993). Retrieved 09.05.18 from: http://www.ecowas.int/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Revised-treaty.pdf
  2. 2.
    O’Hara C, Clement F. Power as agency: a critical reflection on the measurement of women’s empowerment in the development sector. World Dev. 2018;106:111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    EREP, ECOWAS Renewable Energy Policy (2013). Retrieved 09.05.18 from: http://www.ecreee.org/sites/default/files/documents/ecowas_renewable_energy_policy.pdf
  4. 4.
    ECREEE, ECOWAS Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Business Plan – 2011 to 2016. (2011). Available at: http://www.ecreee.org/sites/default/files/ecreee_business_plan.pdf
  5. 5.
    EEEP, ECOWAS Energy Efficiency Policy. (2013). Retrieved 09.05.18 from: http://www.ecreee.org/sites/default/files/documents/ecowas_energy_efficiency_policy.pdf
  6. 6.
    IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature. (2017). Energizing equality: the importance of integrating gender equality principles in national energy policies and frameworks. Retrieved 09.05.18 from: https://portals.iucn.org/union/sites/union/files/doc/iucn-egi-energizing-equality-web.pdf
  7. 7.
    SEforALL, Sustainable Energy for All. (2017). Opening doors: mapping the landscape for sustainable energy, gender diversity and social inclusion. Retrieved 09.05.18 from: https://www.seforall.org/sites/default/files/Opening_Doors-Full.pdf
  8. 8.
    ECOWGEN, ECOWAS Policy for Gender Mainstreaming in Energy Access (2017). Retrieved 09.05.18 from: www.ecreee.org
  9. 9.
    Allwood G. Gender mainstreaming and policy coherence for development: unintended gender consequences and EU policy. Women's Stud Int Forum. 2013;39:42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reckwitz A. Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theory. 2002;5:243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ECREEE, Situation Analysis of Gender and Energy Issues in ECOWAS Member States: Developed for the ECOWAS Policy for Gender Mainstreaming in Energy Access (ECREEE, 2015). Retrieved 09.05.18 from: http://www.ecowrex.org/system/files/situation_analysis_report_energy_and_gender_issues_in_ecowas_2015.pdf
  12. 12.
    Raty R and Carlsson-Kanyama A (2010). Energy consumption by gender in some European countries. Energy policy, 38, 646–649.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alstone P, Niethammer C, Mendonça B, and Eftimie A (2011). Expanding Women’s role in Africa’s modern off-grid lighting market. International Finance Corporation.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clancy J and Roehr U (2003). Gender and energy: is there a Northern perspective? Energy for Sustainable Development, Volume VII No.3.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Swim JK, Vescio TK, Dahl JL, Zawadzki SJ. Gendered discourse about climate change policies. Glob Environ Chang. 2018;48:216–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tjorring L. We forgot half of the population! The significance of gender in Danish energy renovation projects. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2016;22:115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Permana AS, Aziz NA, Siong CH. Is mom energy efficient? A study of gender, household energy consumption and family decision making in Indonesia. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2015;6:78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Inter-parliamentary Union. (2015). Women in Politics: 2015. Retrieved 01.08.18 from: file:///Users/ellen/Downloads/wmnmap15_en%20 (1).pdf.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang S. Green practices are gendered: exploring gender inequality caused by sustainable consumption policies in Taiwan. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2016;18:88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2011). Women and TVET: report of the UNESCO-UNEVOC online conference. Retrieved 09.05.18 from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002155/215566e.pdf
  21. 21.
    Bardasi E (2008). Gender, entrepreneurship and competitiveness: results from enterprise survey data. Retrieved 09.05.18 from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTGENDER/Resources/GendeEntre&Competitiveness-Bardasi.pdf
  22. 22.
    Ropke I. Theories of practice – new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecol Econ. 2009;68:2490–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Labanca N, Bertoldi P. Beyond energy efficiency and individual behaviours: policy insights from social practice theories. Energy Policy. 2018;115:494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Malen J and Marcus AA (2017). Energy Policy. Promotion of clean energy technology entrepreneurship: the role of external context, 102, 7–15.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sanne C. Willing consumers – or locked –in? Policies for sustainable consumption. Ecol Econ. 2002;42:273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monica Maduekwe
    • 1
  • Ellen Morris
    • 2
  • Jennye Greene
    • 2
  • Victoria Healey
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.ECOWAS Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (ECREEE)PraiaCabo Verde
  2. 2.Sustainable Energy SolutionsGlen RidgeUSA
  3. 3.National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)GoldenUSA

Personalised recommendations