Advertisement

Benefits, Challenges, and Analytical Approaches to Scaling Up Renewables Through Regional Planning and Coordination of Power Systems in Africa

  • Daniel RussoEmail author
  • Asami Miketa
Regional Renewable Energy – Africa (D Arent and N Lee, Section Editors)
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Regional Renewable Energy - Africa

Abstract

Purpose of Review

In light of the urgent need and ambition of African communities to scale up the deployment of renewable energy, this article explores the benefits and challenges presented by regional coordination in Africa, and how recent planning studies are reflecting those aspects in their analysis of future power sector expansion on the continent.

Recent Findings

Regional approaches to renewable deployment in Africa can reduce overall system costs and improve operation by expanding access to higher quality renewable resources, while unlocking a greater diversity of renewable options. Regional approaches can also provide greater flexibility and stability to national power systems, as well as complementarity that allows countries to scale up development of single sources while still reducing risks related to climate variability and future change.

Summary

Based on a long history of experience, the benefits of regional approaches to power sector development and operation are now well established. New methodologies using more granular geospatial and temporal data have emerged to make the analysis of these benefits more feasible and more detailed. Novel additions to planning studies are also presenting more nuanced insights into the implications that climate change, technological innovations, and socio-political influences could have on regional renewable energy deployment.

Keywords

Africa Renewable energy Regional integration Power pools WAPP SAPP Planning Modelling Capacity expansion 

Notes

Compliance With Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    • IRENA. Africa Power Sector: Planning and Prospects for Renewable Energy [Internet]. International Renewable Energy Agency; 2015. Available from: http://www.irena.org/publications/2015/Mar/Africa-Power-Sector-Planning-and-Prospects-for-Renewable-Energy-synthesis-report. Accessed 30 Jul 2018 Renewable prospects based on the best validated renewable costs and resource data from IRENA, formulated using least-cost capacity expansion models for all continental African countries.
  2. 2.
    Deloitte. The roadmap to a fully integrated and operational East African Power Pool. 2015. (2015 Edition).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NEPAD. Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (PIDA) [Internet]. New Partnership for Africa’s Development. 2018. Available from: http://www.nepad.org/programme/programme-infrastructure-development-africa-pida. Accessed 30 Jul 2018
  4. 4.
    • Trotter PA, McManus MC, Maconachie R. Electricity planning and implementation in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;74:1189–209. Novel approach for transmission investment planning that reflects Africa-specific political risks, identified though a systematic review of a large body of literature on political risks in the continent. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    • Adeoye O, Spataru C. Sustainable development of the West African Power Pool: Increasing solar energy integration and regional electricity trade. Energy Sustain Dev. 2018;45:124–34. A rare study that looks at how solar PV can be integrated in the operation of the Western African power pool using a model with high spatial-temporal detail, presenting a sustainable strategy to diversify from hydro and gas regional projects, while reducing electricity prices. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Böckers V, Haucap J, Heimeshoff U. Benefits of an integrated European electricity market the role of competition [Internet]. Brussels; 2013 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. Available from:  https://doi.org/10.2861/19914
  7. 7.
    Kahl M, Freye C, Leibfried T. A cooperative multi-area optimization with renewable generation and storage devices. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2015;30(5):2386–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muntschick J. The Southern African power pool: an electrifying project with untapped potential. In: The Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the European Union (EU) [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. p. 267–305. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-45330-9_8
  9. 9.
    World Bank. Regional power sector integration : lessons from global case studies and a literature review [Internet]. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2010. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17507. Accessed 30 Jul 2018Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sadoff C, Grey D. Beyond the river: the benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy. 2002;4(5):389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aslani A, Antila E, Wong K-FV. Comparative analysis of energy security in the Nordic countries: the role of renewable energy resources in diversification. J Renew Sustain Energy. 2012 Nov;4(6):062701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    IRENA. Planning for the renewable future: long-term modelling and tools to expand variable renewable power in emerging economies. International Renewable Energy Agency; 2017. Available from: https://www.irena.org/publications/2017/Jan/Planning-for-the-renewable-future-Long-term-modelling-and-tools-to-expand-variable-renewable-power
  13. 13.
    Vanheukelom J, Byiers B, Bilal S, Woolfrey S. Political Economy of Regional Integration in Sub-Saharan Africa. 2016.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muntschick J. The Southern African Development Community (SADC): an analytical overview of its history, policies and institutional framework. In: The Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the European Union (EU) [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. p. 83–103. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-45330-9_3
  15. 15.
    Pirozzi N, Litsegård A. The EU and Africa: Regionalism and Interregionalism Beyond Institutions. In: Interregionalism across the Atlantic Space [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. p. 75–93. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-62908-7_5
  16. 16.
    Raskin P, Lazarus M. Regional energy development in Southern Africa: great potential, Great Constraints. Annu Rev Energy Environ. 1991;16(1):145–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindström A, Rosner K, Granit J. Cooperation in the power sector to advance regionalisation processes and sustainable energy flows. In: Dawson, Marcelle C, Rosin C, Wald N, editors. Global Resource Scarcity Catalyst for Conflict or Cooperation? Abingdon: Routledge; 2018. p. 39–55.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dutton J, Lockwood M. Ideas, institutions and interests in the politics of cross-border electricity interconnection: Greenlink, Britain and Ireland. Energy Policy. 2017 Jun;105:375–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Puka L, Szulecki K. The politics and economics of cross-border electricity infrastructure: a framework for analysis. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2014 Dec;4:124–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Agbodo E, Maharaj A, Adeyemo B, Davidson IE. Transforming the West African regional electricity market — lessons and experiences. In IEEE; 2017 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. p. 198–201. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7991223/
  21. 21.
    Krapohl S, Fink S. Different paths of regional integration: trade networks and regional institution-building in Europe, Southeast Asia and Southern Africa: different paths of regional integration. JCMS J Common Mark Stud. 2013;51(3):472–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Labordena M, Patt A, Bazilian M, Howells M, Lilliestam J. Impact of political and economic barriers for concentrating solar power in Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Policy. 2017;102:52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kenfack J, Lewetchou KJ, Bossou OV, Tchaptchet E. How can we promote renewable energy and energy efficiency in Central Africa? A Cameroon case study. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;75:1217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Conway D, Dalin C, Landman WA, Osborn TJ. Hydropower plans in eastern and southern Africa increase risk of concurrent climate-related electricity supply disruption. Nat Energy. 2017;2(12):946–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Green N, Sovacool BK, Hancock K. Grand designs: assessing the African energy security implications of the Grand Inga Dam. Afr Stud Rev. 2015;58(01):133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    IRENA. Africa 2030: roadmap for a renewable energy future [internet]. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency; 2015. Available from: http://www.irena.org/remap Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    IRENA. Untapped potential for climate action: renewable energy in nationally determined contributions. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA); 2017.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Greening the Grid: Pathways to Integrate 175 Gigawatts of Renewable Energy into India’s Electric Grid, Vol. I—National Study [Internet]. Golden, Colorado, US: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL); 2017. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/india-renewable-integration-study.html. Accessed 30 Jul 2018Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bloom A, Townsend A, Palchak D, Novacheck J, King J, Barrows C, et al. Eastern renewable generation integration study [Internet]. Golden, Colorado, US: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL); 2016. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/india-renewable-integration-study.html. Accessed 30 Jul 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Benasla M, Allaoui T, Brahami M, Denaï M, Sood VK. HVDC links between North Africa and Europe: impacts and benefits on the dynamic performance of the European system. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;82:3981–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Musau, Moses Peter. Asynchronous Interconnection of the Proposed East Africa Power Pool ( EAPP ). In 2017 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=7983001
  32. 32.
    Panumpabi P, Idehen I, Backes M. Design and visualization of the central, eastern, and Southern African power grid with large-scale generation in Tanzania. In IEEE; 2017 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. p. 1–5. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7868288/
  33. 33.
    IRENA. Southern African Power Pool: Planning and Prospects for Renewable Energy. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA); 2013.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    IRENA. West African Power Pool: planning and prospects for renewable energy. 2013.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saadi N, Miketa A, Howells M. African clean energy corridor: regional integration to promote renewable energy fueled growth. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2015;5:130–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Taliotis C, Shivakumar A, Ramos E, Howells M, Mentis D, Sridharan V, et al. An indicative analysis of investment opportunities in the African electricity supply sector — using TEMBA (the electricity model base for Africa). Energy Sustain Dev. 2016;31:50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sanoh A, Kocaman AS, Kocal S, Sherpa S, Modi V. The economics of clean energy resource development and grid interconnection in Africa. Renew Energy. 2014;62:598–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Trotter PA. Discussion paper: identifying and resolving methodological issues in previous Africa-wide electricity planning optimisation research - a comment on Sanoh et al. (2014). Renew Energy. 2017;114:1442–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    • Wu GC, Deshmukh R, Ndhlukula K, Radojicic T, Reilly-Moman J, Phadke A, et al. Strategic siting and regional grid interconnections key to low-carbon futures in African countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;201611845. Newly constructed GIS-based zoning database, used in the context of planning, bringing new insights on temporal and spatial complementarity of renewable resources into long-term planning. Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Spalding-Fecher R, Senatla M, Yamba F, Lukwesa B, Himunzowa G, Heaps C, et al. Electricity supply and demand scenarios for the Southern African power pool. Energy Policy. 2017;101(2016):403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Taliotis C, Bazilian M, Welsch M, Gielen D, Howells M. Grand Inga to power Africa: hydropower development scenarios to 2035. Energy Strategy Rev. 2014;4:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mentis D, Siyal SH, Korkovelos A, Howells M. Estimating the spatially explicit wind generated electricity cost in Africa - a GIS based analysis. Energy Strategy Rev. 2017;17:45–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ouedraogo NS. Modeling sustainable long-term electricity supply-demand in Africa. Appl Energy. 2017;190:1047–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schwerhoff G, Sy M. Developing Africa’s energy mix. Clim Policy. 2018;5:1–17.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    van der Zwaan B, Kober T, Longa FD, van der Laan A, Jan KG. An integrated assessment of pathways for low-carbon development in Africa. Energy Policy. 2018;117:387–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Spalding-Fecher R, Joyce B, Winkler H. Climate change and hydropower in the Southern African power Pool and Zambezi River basin: system-wide impacts and policy implications. Energy Policy. 2017;103:84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    • Barasa M, Bogdanov D, Oyewo AS, Breyer C. A cost optimal resolution for Sub-Saharan Africa powered by 100% renewables in 2030. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;92:440–57. A study that presents a 100% renewable energy system for Sub-Saharan Africa, using an hourly resolution optimization model, which allows full investigation into investment in and operation of various flexibility options including desalination and power-to-gas sectors. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rawn B, Louie H. Planning for Electrification: On- and Off-Grid Considerations in Sub-Saharan Africa. IDS Bull [Internet]. 2017 1 [cited 2018 Jul 30];48(5–6). Available from: http://bulletin.ids.ac.uk/idsbo/article/view/2912
  49. 49.
    Mentis D, Howells M, Rogner H, Korkovelos A, Arderne C, Zepeda E, et al. Lighting the world: the first application of an open source, spatial electrification tool (OnSSET) on Sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Res Lett. 2017;12(8):085003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dagnachew AG, Lucas PL, Hof AF, Gernaat DEHJ, de Boer H-S, van Vuuren DP. The role of decentralized systems in providing universal electricity access in Sub-Saharan Africa – a model-based approach. Energy. 2017;139:184–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Trotter PA, Maconachie R, McManus MC. Solar energy’s potential to mitigate political risks: the case of an optimised Africa-wide network. Energy Policy. 2018;117:108–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Trotter PA, Maconachie R, McManus MC. The impact of political objectives on optimal electricity generation and transmission in the Southern African Power Pool. J Energy South Afr. 2017;28(3):27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    • Bazilian M, Chattopadhyay D. Considering power system planning in fragile and conflict states. Energy Sustain Dev. 2016;32:110–20. Novel approach to factor in political risks in long-term planning based on a least-cost investment optimisation model, which makes the results more relevant in selected fragile and conflict states in Africa. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRENABonnGermany

Personalised recommendations