Advertisement

Temporal Variation of Ground-Borne Vibrations in Ballasted High-Speed Railway Embankments

  • M. Roshan Khan
  • Satyanarayana Murty DasakaEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

The ascending requirement of railway passengers for fast transit to distant stations has led to the development of high-speed railway networks. Faster and longer trains with heavy axle loads are in operation, inducing stronger ground vibrations in the supporting railway infrastructure. The conventional design of railway track structures are based on the maximum displacements safely allowed in the track under the expected railway loads. However, the vibrations generated in the tracks due to railway operations should also be of concern. This study characterizes the peak particle velocities (PPVs) generated in the component strata of a ballasted railway embankment during high-speed train transit within 160 to 200 km/h. The transient response of each strata is characterized for transit of wheel load in the vibration influence zone, and temporal variation of PPVs have been logged for the transit of wheel load through a distance of 30 m on the railway track. The results from the present study indicate that railway track embankments are subject to strong ground motions during high-speed train transit, which will lead to accelerated degradation of the track structure. Ground vibrations are remnant in the railway embankment, even after passage of train wheels to farther distances. Deployment of vibration mitigation measures are recommended in sensitive locations proximate to railway lines. The particle velocities quantified in this study can be utilized by railway design authorities for estimating ground-borne railway vibrations under multiple train wheel configurations, based on the axle spacing, bogie spacing and the depth of the track under consideration.

Keywords

High-speed railways Railway embankment Ground vibrations Ballasted railway tracks Peak particle velocities 

Notes

References

  1. AREMA: Manual for railway engineering. American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association, Lanham (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Avramovic, N.: Comparison of ballast and ballastless tracks. Master’s thesis. Technical University Graz, Austria (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Blanco, B.: Railway track dynamic modelling. Doctoral dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholmn (2017)Google Scholar
  4. Bolton, M.D.: The strength and dilatancy of sands. Geotechnique. 36(1), 65–78 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.1.65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. British Railway Board: Permissible track forces for railway vehicles. Group Standard GM/TT0088, 1(A), 1-11, (1993)Google Scholar
  6. Bull, J.W.: Numerical analysis and modelling in geomechanics. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connolly, D.P., Kouroussis, G., Woodward, P.K., Costa, P.A., Verlinden, O., Forde, M.C.: Field testing and analysis of high speed rail vibrations. Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 67, 102–118 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Correia, A.G., Cunha, J., Marcelino, J., Caldeira, L., Varandas, J., Dimitrovová, Z., Silva, M.: Dynamic analysis of rail track for high speed trains. 2D approach. In: 5th Intl. Worksop on Application of Computational Mechanics on Geotechnical Engineering, Guimaraes, Portugal (2007)  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439833414.ch39 Google Scholar
  9. Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., Lewy, H.: On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics. IBM. J. Res. Dev. 11(2), 215–234 (1967).  https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.112.0215 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Czyczula, W., Koziol, P., Blaszkiewicz, D.: On the equivalence between static and dynamic railway track response and on the Euler-Bernoulli and Timoshenko beams analogy. Shock. Vib. 2701715, 1–13 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2701715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danesh, A., Palassi, M., Mirghasemi, A.A.: Evaluating the influence of ballast degradation on its shear behaviour. Int. J. Rail. Transp. 6(3), 145–162 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2017.1411212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Das, B.M.: Principles of foundation engineering, 5th. Thomson, Canada (2005)Google Scholar
  13. Dimitrovova, Z., Varandas, J.N.: The Influence of damping on vibration induced by high-speed trains. In: Proc. of 11th Intl. Conf. on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing, St. Julian’s, Malta (2007)Google Scholar
  14. Esveld, C.: Modern Railway Track, 2nd edn. Delft University of Technology, Delft (2001)Google Scholar
  15. Feng, H.: 3D-models of railway track for dynamic analysis. Master’s thesis. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (2011)Google Scholar
  16. Hopkins, B.M., Taheri, S.: A dynamic wheel/rail interaction model based on an Euler-Bernoulli beam rail model. In: ASME 2011 Rail Transportation Division Fall Technical Conference, ASME, United States of America, 17-22 (2011)  https://doi.org/10.1115/RTDF2011-67003
  17. Jenkins, H.H., Stephenson, J.E., Clayton, G.A., Morland, G.W., Lyon, D.: The effect of track and vehicle parameters on wheel/rail vertical dynamic forces. Railway. Eng. J. 3(1), 2–16 (1974)Google Scholar
  18. Khan, M.R., Dasaka, S.M.: Wheel-rail Interactions in high speed railway networks during rapid train transit. Mater. Today. Proc. Elsevier. 5(11), 25450–25457 (2018a).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan, M.R., Dasaka, S.M.: Variation of effective frictional coefficient at wheel-rail contact interfaces during high speed railway operations. IOP. Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 377(1), 012001 (2018b).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan, M.R., Dasaka, S.M.: Quantification of ground-vibrations generated by high speed trains in ballasted railway tracks. Transp. Geotech. 20, 100245 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koro, K., Abe, K., Ishida, M., Suzuki, T.: Timoshenko beam finite element for vehicle - track vibration analysis and its application to jointed railway track. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail. Rapid. Transit. 218(2), 159–172 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1243/0954409041319687 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kouroussis, G., Connolly, D.P., Alexandrou, G., Vogiatzis, K.: Railway ground vibrations induced by wheel and rail singular defects. Vehicle. Syst. Dyn. 53(10), 1500–1519 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2015.1062116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leshchinsky, B., Ling, H.I.: Numerical modeling of behavior of railway ballasted structure with geocell confinement. Geotext. Geomembr. 36, 33–43 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, D., Selig, E.T.: Method for railroad track foundation design. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124(4), 316–322 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:4(316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, D., Hyslip, J., Sussmann, T., Chrismer, S.: Railway geotechnics. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Florida (2015)Google Scholar
  26. Li, P., Ling, X., Zhang, F., Li, Y., Zhao, Y.: Field testing and analysis of embankment vibrations induced by heavy haul trains. Shock. Vib. 7410836 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7410836 Google Scholar
  27. Ling, H.I., Wu, J.T.H., Tatsuoka, F.: Short-term strength and deformation characteristics of geotextiles under typical operational conditions. Geotext. Geomembr. 11(2), 185–219 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(92)90043-A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ling, H.I., Liu, H., Kaliakin, V.N., Leshchinsky, D.: Analyzing dynamic behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls. J. Eng. Mech. 130(8), 911–920 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:8(911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lou, P., Dai, G.L., Zeng, Q.Y.: Dynamic analysis of a Timoshenko beam subjected to moving concentrated forces using the finite element method. Shock. Vib. 14, 459–468 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/460206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mallik, A.K., Chandra, S., Singh, A.B.: Steady-state response of an elastically supported infinite beam to a moving load. J. Sound. Vib. 291(3-5), 1148–1169 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.07.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mandhaniya, P.: Finite element analysis of static and dynamic loading on ballastless rail track. Master’s thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur (2016)Google Scholar
  32. Mazilu, T.: The dynamics of an infinite uniform Euler-Bernoulli beam on bilinear viscoelastic foundation under moving loads. Procedia. Eng. 199, 2561–2566 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministry of Railways of the P.R.C.: Code for design of high-speed railway. China Railway Publishing House, Beijing, China (2010)Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell, J.K., Soga, K.: Fundamentals of soil behaviour, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  35. Premoli, A., Rocchi, D., Schito, P., Somaschini, C., Tomasini, G.: Ballast flight under high-speed trains: wind tunnel full-scale experimental tests. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerod. 145, 351–361 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Qi, Y., Dai, H., Yang, J., Xu, K.: Dynamic analysis of vehicle track coupling based on double beam track model. Shock. Vib. 7469894, 1–10 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7469894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Research designs & standards organisation: guidelines and specifications for design of formation for heavy axle load, GE: 0014. Ministry of Railways, Government of India (2009)Google Scholar
  38. Singh, D.V., Seth, Y.: 3D Modelling of ground surface vibration induced by underground train movement. Procedia. Eng. 173, 1580–1586 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dassault Systems: Abaqus/CAE User’s Manual 6.14. http://abaqus.software.polimi.it/v6.14/index.html (2017). Accessed 26 August 2017
  40. Tatsuoka, F., Tateyama, M., Koseki, J., Yonezawa, T.: Geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures for railways in Japan. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 1(1), 3–53 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-013-0001-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu, J.T.H.: Characteristics of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) walls: an overview of field-scale experiments and analytical studies. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 6(2), 138–163 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-019-00074-x MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu, J.T.H., Yang, K.H., Mohamed, S., Pham, T., Chen, R.H.: Suppression of soil dilation - A reinforcing mechanism of soil-geosynthetic composites. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 1(1), 68–82 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-014-0003-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zakeri, J.A., Fattahi, M., Ghanimoghadam, M.M.: Influence of unsupported and partially supported sleepers on dynamic responses of train–track interaction. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 29(6), 2289–2295 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0521-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zarembski, A.M., Grissom, G.T., Euston, T.L., Cronin, J.J.: Relationship between missing ballast and development of track geometry defects. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 2(4), 167–176 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-015-0025-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zarembski, A.M., Palese, J., Hartsough, C.M., Ling, H.I., Thompson, H.: Application of geocell track substructure support system to correct surface degradation problems under high-speed passenger railroad operations. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 4(4), 106–125 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-017-0042-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhong, S.Q., Xiong, J.Y., Xiao, X.B., Wen, Z.F., Jin, X.S.: Effect of the first two wheelset bending modes on wheel-rail contact behavior. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A. 15(12), 984–1001 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1400199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations