Advertisement

Morphological, physiological and molecular analysis of Line × Tester in Populus deltoides Bartr

  • Samriti SharmaEmail author
  • Sneha Dobbal
  • Raj Kumar
  • Sanjeev Thakur
Original Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

In the present investigation, male and female clones/strains/species of Populus deltoides procured from State Forest Department, Haldwani and Shyampur, Haridwar Forest Division and maintained in the germplasm block of Naganji nursery from which 11 male and 13 female clones were included in the reproductive study and the selected plant material of 4 females (G-48, S 1, S 7 C 8 and L-62/84) and 4 males (S 7 C 11, L-17/92, L-124/86 and S 7 C 1) clones were crossed using Line × Tester (4 × 4) mating design. Control crossing was done and seedlings were raised in the nursery at stage-1 and were evaluated for morphological characters. In stage-2 clonal cuttings of selected individuals were raised in RBD and were evaluated for morphological, physiological and wood characters. The gene action study revealed that dominance variance was observed more than the additive variance for all the parameters studied. The proportional contribution of lines was higher than individual contribution of testers or line × tester interaction except for plant height, collar diameter, internodal length, leaf area, maximum width of leaf, angle between the mid rib and 2 nd lower lateral mid rib, shoot bark thickness, root bark thickness, fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, dry root weight, dry root shoot ratio, root length, total fresh weight, total dry weight, stomatal conductance and fibre length. Among 18 SSR markers, fifteen markers showed monomorphic allelic pattern, the remaining three markers (PMGC-2060, PMGC-2020 and PMGC-451) showed polymorphic pattern. A close appraisal of the SSR banding pattern obtained after the amplification of genomic DNA of both the parents and their hybrids revealed that, all the hybrids were similar to their parents.

Keywords

Populus deltoids Control crossing Nursery Morphological analysis SSR analysis 

Notes

References

  1. Aasamaa, K., Heinsoo, K., & Holm, B. (2010). Biomass production, water use and photosynthesis of Salix clones grown in a waste water purification system. Biomass and Bioenergy,34(6), 897–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouman, T. O., & Sylliboy, J. (2012). Biomass allocation and photosynthetic capacity of willow (Salix spp.) bioenergy varieties. Forestarchiv,83, 139–143.Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, K. D., Phillips, I. S., Kopp, R. F., Volk, T. A., Maynard, C. A., Abrahamson, L. P., et al. (2008). Quantitative genetics of traits indicative of biomass production and heterosis in 34 full-sib F1Salix eriocephala families. Bioenergy Research,1, 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cervera, M. T., Storme, V., Soto, A., Ivens, B., Montagu, M. V., Rajora, O. P., et al. (2005). Intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Populus based on AFLP markers. Theoretical Applied Genetics,111(7), 1440–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ceulemans, R., Scarascia, M. G., Wuard, B. M., Briame, J. H., Hinckley, T. M., Stettler, R. F., et al. (1992). Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids growing under short rotation, I. clones compaisions of 4 years growth and physiology. Canadian Journal Forest Research,22(12), 1937–1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chauhan, R., Chauhan, S., & Khujaria, H. N. (2004). Reproductive biology and viariability studies in Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Advances in Forestry Research in India,28, 24–37.Google Scholar
  7. Dhiman, R. C., & Gandhi, J. N. (2012). Clonal development and diversity in WIMCO’s poplar programme. Forestry Bulletin,12(1), 40–48.Google Scholar
  8. Dhir, N. K., & Mohn, C. A. (1976). A comparative study of crosses between and within two geographical diverse sources of eastern cotton wood. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research,6(3), 400–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falconer, D. S. (1989). An Introduction to quantitative genetics (3rd ed., p. 438). London: Longman Scientific and Technical Publication.Google Scholar
  10. Gupta, A., Singh, N. B., Choudhary, P., Sharma, J. P., & Sankhyan, H. P. (2014). Estimation of genetic variability, heritability and genetic gain for wood density and fibre length in 36 clones of white willow (Salix alba L.). International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology,7(2), 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huse, S. K. (2004). Evaluation of arborescent willow clones for growth at nursery stage. M.Sc. thesis. Dr. Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P.) (p. 81).Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F., & Comstock, R. E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy Journal,47(7), 314–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kadam, S.K. (2002). Evaluation of full-sib progenies of selected clones of Poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr.) Ph.D thesis. Forest Research Institute (Deemed) University. Dehradun.Google Scholar
  14. Khurana, D. K. (2000). Reproductive biology of Populus ciliata Wall. ex Royle. In R. K. Kohli, H. P. Singh, S. P. Vij, K. K. Dhir, D. R. Batish, & D. K. Khurana (Eds.), Man and forests (pp. 235–240). Chandigarh: Punjab University.Google Scholar
  15. Khurana, D. K., Narkhede, S. (1995). Poplar improvement in Himachal Pradesh. In Khurana DK (Ed) Poplars in India recent research trends (pp. 7–40). IDRC-UHF.Google Scholar
  16. Luna, R. K., & Singh, B. (2009). Estimation of genetic variability and correlation in Eucalyptus hybrid progeny for early selection. The Indian Forester,135(2), 147–161.Google Scholar
  17. Ozel, H. A., Ertekin, M., & Tunçtaner, K. (2010). Genetic variation in growth traits and morphological characteristics of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) hybrids at nursery stage. Scientific Research and Essays,5(9), 962–969.Google Scholar
  18. Panse, V. G., & Sukhatme, P. V. (1967). Statistical methods for agricultural workers (p. 610p). New Delhi: ICAR.Google Scholar
  19. Pant, K., Prabakar, M., & Panwer, P. (2003). Floral biology of Grewia optiva Drommond. Annals of Plant and Soil Research,5(1), 61–69.Google Scholar
  20. Raja, R. (2014). Evaluation of progenies of tree willows. M.Sc thesis. Dr. Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (HP) (p. 87).Google Scholar
  21. Rizvi, R. H., Khare, D., & Dhillon, R. S. (2008). Statistical models for aboveground biomass of Populus deltoides planted in agroforestry in Haryana. Tropical Ecology,49(1), 35–42.Google Scholar
  22. Samriti, K. R., Shilpa, E. V., Poonam, T. D., & Kumar, K. (2017). Assessment of genetic diversity in Rubus ellipticus (Smith) using molecular markers. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy,83(3), 669–679.Google Scholar
  23. Satoh, S., Ishizawa, K., Mitsui, Y., & Minato, K. (2011). Growth and above ground biomass production of a willow clone with high productivity, Salix pet-susu clone KKD. Journal of Japan Institute of Energy,91(10), 948–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharma, S., Dobhal, S., & Thakur, S. (2018). Analysis of genetic diversity in parents and hybrids of Populus deltoides Bartr using microsatellite markers. Applied Biological Research,20(3), 262–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharma, S., Kaur, R., Solanke, A. K. U., Dubey, H., Tiwari, S., & Kumar, K. (2019). Transcriptome sequencing of Himalayan Raspberry (Rubus ellipticus) and development of simple sequence repeat markers. Biotech.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1685-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharma, S., & Sharma, A. (2018). Molecular markers based plant breeding. Advances in Research,16(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh, K. (2002). Evaluation of full-sib progenies of selected clones of poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr.) Ph. D. thesis. Forest Research Institute (Deemed) University Dehradun (p. 230).Google Scholar
  28. Singh, N. B., Choudhary, P., & Joshi, S. (2013). Molecular diversity in willow clones selected for commercial plantation. The Indian Forester,26(2), 138–145.Google Scholar
  29. Singh, T. J., Gupta, T., & Sharma, S. (2019). Development and purity identification of hybrids by using molecular marker in wild pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Scientia Horticulturae,247, 436–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, D.M. (1954). Maximum moisture content for determining specific gravity of small wood samples. Forest Products laboratory. USDA. Forest Service Report (p. 2014).Google Scholar
  31. Stanton, B. J., Haiby, K., Gantz, C., Espinoza, J., & Shuren, A. R. (2019). The economics of rapid multiplication of hybrid poplar biomass varieties. Forests,10, 446–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stettler, R. F., Zsuffa, L., & Wu, R. (1996). The role of hybridization in genetic manipulation. In R. F. Stettler, et al. (Eds.), Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation (pp. 87–112). Ottawa: WRC Press.Google Scholar
  33. Vaario, L. M., Rousi, M., Sipila, T., & Pulkkinen, P. (2011). Leaf number indicates salt tolerance of young seedling families of European aspen (Populus tremula L.) growing in different soils. Silva Fennica,45(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Villar, M., Gaget, M., Said, C., Knox, R. B., & Dumas, C. (1987). Incompatibility in Populus: Structural and cytochemical characteristics of the receptive stigmas of Populus alba and P. nigra. Journal of Cell Science,87(3), 483–490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wani, A. M. (2005). Reproductive biology and genetic variation in Bauhinia verigata Linn. Ph. D. thesis. Dr. Y S. Parmar Univ. of Horti. and Forty. Solan (H P).Google Scholar
  36. White, T. L., Adams, W. T., & Neale, D. B. (2007). Forest genetics (p. 680). Cambridge: CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu, R., & Stettler, R. F. (1997). Quantitative genetics of growth and development in Populus. II. The partitioning of genotype environment interaction in stem growth. Heredity,78(2), 124–134.Google Scholar
  38. Xiaomei, T., Guoqing, J., Jiqing, S., Jiazhong, Y., Mingge, L., & Zhichun, Z. (2011). Genetic analysis of growth and wood density of progeny of nested mating Pinus massoniana. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,47(6), 32–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society for Plant Physiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyChandigarh Group of CollegesLandranIndia
  2. 2.Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and ForestryRanichauriIndia
  3. 3.National Dairy Research InstituteKarnalIndia
  4. 4.Department of Tree ImprovementDr Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and ForestryNauni, SolanIndia

Personalised recommendations