Indian Journal of Plant Physiology

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 521–528 | Cite as

Additional N supply improves grain yield in Triticale (× Triticosecale sp.) better than wheat (Triticum aestivum. L) under elevated CO2 environment

  • Kritika Adesh Gadpayle
  • Ranjan Bhattacharyya
  • Madan PalEmail author
  • M. H. FulekarEmail author
Original Article


The response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. var. PBW-550) and Triticale (a wheat and rye hybrid) were enhanced at elevated atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen (N) nutrition. Both the crops were raised in plastic pots inside open top chambers under ambient CO2 (AC) and elevated CO2 (EC) levels and varying N supply, viz., N0 (optimum N), N1.5 (one and half times of optimum N) and N2 (twice the optimum N). Findings of the study showed that significant growth improvement in terms of leaf area, root and shoot biomass accumulation under elevated atmospheric CO2 at optimum and super optimal N nutrition, in both the crop species. Chlorophyll content, rate of photosynthesis as well as soluble sugars increased under elevated atmospheric CO2 and N nutrition, while soluble protein content and stomatal conductance decreased and no significant changes occurred in leaf starch under above treatments, in wheat as well as Triticale. Results also showed significantly higher plant biomass, grain yield and 1000 grain weight under elevated CO2 as compared with ambient conditions. Plant height and number of tillers increased in response to elevated CO2 and high N in both the crop species. Super optimal N supply showed larger increase in grain yield and 1000 grain weight of Triticale as compared to wheat variety, while increase in biological yield in response to higher N was more in wheat variety. The above findings suggest that addition of N supply under elevated CO2 environment, can enhance growth and grain yield more in Triticale than that of wheat.


Climate change Elevated CO2 Photosynthesis Grain yield Triticale and wheat 



The first author duly acknowledges the financial assistance in the form of the fellowship received from the University Grants Commission, India (Grant No. 2012-13/RGNF-2012-13-SC-MAH-20061). Facilities used at Divisions of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi are duly acknowledged. The suggestions and guidance given by Dr. Divya Shah are sincerely acknowledged.


  1. Adam, N. R., Wall, G. W., Kimball, B. A., Pinter, P. J., LaMorte, R. L., Hunsaker, D. J., et al. (2000). Acclimation response of spring wheat in a free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) atmosphere with variable soil nitrogen regimes. 1. Leaf position and phenology determine acclimation response. Photosynthesis Research, 66(1–2), 65–77.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Aranjuelo, I., Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Morcuende, R., Avice, J. C., Nogués, S., Araus, J. L., et al. (2011). Does ear C sink strength contribute to overcoming photosynthetic acclimation of wheat plants exposed to elevated CO2? Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(11), 3957–3969.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnon, D. (1949). Estimation of total chlorophyll. Plant Physiology, 24(1), 1–15.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72(1–2), 248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broberg, M. C., Högy, P., & Pleijel, H. (2017). CO2-induced changes in wheat grain composition: Meta-analysis and response functions. Agronomy, 7(2), 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butterly, C. R., Armstrong, R., Chen, D., & Tang, C. (2015). Carbon and nitrogen partitioning of wheat and field pea grown with two nitrogen levels under elevated CO2. Plant and Soil, 391(1–2), 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erice, G., Irigoyen, J. J., Pérez, P., Martínez-Carrasco, R., & Sánchez-Díaz, M. (2006). Effect of elevated CO2, temperature and drought on dry matter partitioning and photosynthesis before and after cutting of nodulated alfalfa. Plant Science, 170(6), 1059–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fangmeier, A., De Temmerman, L., Mortensen, L., Kemp, K., Burke, J., Mitchell, R., et al. (1999). Effects on nutrients and on grain quality in spring wheat crops grown under elevated CO2 concentrations and stress conditions in the European, multiple-site experiment ‘ESPACE-wheat’. European Journal of Agronomy, 10(3–4), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franzaring, J., Weller, S., Schmid, I., & Fangmeier, A. (2011). Growth, senescence and water use efficiency of spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Mozart) grown in a factorial combination of nitrogen supply and elevated CO2. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 72(2), 284–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han, X., Hao, X., Lam, S. K., Wang, H., Li, Y., Wheeler, T., et al. (2015). Yield and nitrogen accumulation and partitioning in winter wheat under elevated CO2: A 3-year free-air CO2 enrichment experiment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 209, 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman, W. (2016). Ecosystems, food crops, and bioscience: A symbiosis for the anthropocene. Asian Biotechnology and Development Review, 18(1), 39–68.Google Scholar
  12. Isopp, H., Frehner, M., Long, S. P., & Nösberger, J. (2000). Sucrose-phosphate synthase responds differently to source-sink relations and to photosynthetic rates: Lolium perenne L. growing at elevated pCO2 in the field. Plant, Cell and Environment, 23(6), 597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jensen, B., & Christensen, B. T. (2004). Interactions between elevated CO2 and added N: Effects on water use, biomass, and soil 15 N uptake in wheat. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science, 54(3), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, H. Y., Lieffering, M., Kobayashi, K., Okada, M., Mitchell, M. W., & Gumpertz, M. (2003). Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment and nitrogen supply on the yield of temperate paddy rice crops. Field Crops Research, 83(3), 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lam, S. K., Chen, D., Norton, R., Armstrong, R., & Mosier, A. R. (2012). Nitrogen dynamics in grain crop and legume pasture systems under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 18(9), 2853–2859.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Manderscheid, R., Pacholski, A., Frühauf, C., & Weigel, H. J. (2009). Effects of free air carbon dioxide enrichment and nitrogen supply on growth and yield of winter barley cultivated in a crop rotation. Field Crops Research, 110(3), 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mergoum, M., Singh, P. K., Pena, R. J., Lozano-del Río, A. J., Cooper, K. V., Salmon, D. F., & Macpherson, H. G. (2009). Triticale: a “new” crop with old challenges. In Cereals (pp. 267–287). Springer, New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., et al. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. In Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 151). IPCC.Google Scholar
  19. Pal, M., Rao, L. S., Jain, V., Srivastava, A. C., Pandey, R., Raj, A., et al. (2005). Effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen on wheat growth and photosynthesis. Biologia Plantarum, 49(3), 467–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paul, M. J., & Driscoll, S. P. (1997). Sugar repression of photosynthesis: The role of carbohydrates in signalling nitrogen deficiency through source: sink imbalance. Plant, Cell and Environment, 20(1), 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reich, P. B., Hungate, B. A., & Luo, Y. (2006). Carbon-nitrogen interactions in terrestrial ecosystems in response to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 37, 611–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saha, S., Chakraborty, D., Pal, M., & Nagarajan, S. (2011). Impact of elevated CO2 on utilization of soil moisture and associated soil biophysical parameters in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 142(3–4), 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saha, S., Sehgal, V. K., Chakraborty, D., & Pal, M. (2015). Atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment induced modifications in canopy radiation utilization, growth and yield of chickpea [Cicer arietinum L.)]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 202, 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanz-Sáez, Á., Erice, G., Aranjuelo, I., Nogués, S., Irigoyen, J. J., & Sánchez-Díaz, M. (2010). Photosynthetic down-regulation under elevated CO2 exposure can be prevented by nitrogen supply in nodulated alfalfa. Journal of Plant Physiology, 167(18), 1558–1565.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Saxe, H., Ellsworth, D. S., & Heath, J. (1998). Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO 2 atmosphere. The New Phytologist, 139(3), 395–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schütz, M., & Fangmeier, A. (2001). Growth and yield responses of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Minaret) to elevated CO2 and water limitation. Environmental Pollution, 114(2), 187–194.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Taub, D. R., & Wang, X. (2008). Why are nitrogen concentrations in plant tissues lower under elevated CO2? A critical examination of the hypotheses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50(11), 1365–1374.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Thompson, M., Gamage, D., Hirotsu, N., Martin, A., & Seneweera, S. (2017). Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning: A perspective on root sugar sensing and hormonal crosstalk. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 578.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Uprety, D. C., & Mahalaxmi, V. (2000). Effect of elevated CO2 and nitrogen nutrition on photosynthesis, growth and carbon-nitrogen balance in Brassica juncea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 184(4), 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang, L., Feng, Z., & Schjoerring, J. K. (2013). Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on physiology and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): A meta-analytic test of current hypotheses. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 178, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yoshida, S., Forno, D. A., & Cock, J. H. (1971). Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
  32. Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research, 14(6), 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ziska, L. H., Bunce, J. A., Shimono, H., Gealy, D. R., Baker, J. T., Newton, P. C., et al. (2012). Food security and climate change: On the potential to adapt global crop production by active selection to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, rspb20121005.Google Scholar
  34. Ziska, L. H., Namuco, O., Moya, T., & Quilang, J. (1997). Growth and yield response of field-grown tropical rice to increasing carbon dioxide and air temperature. Agronomy Journal, 89(1), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ziska, L. H., Weerakoon, W., Namuco, O. S., & Pamplona, R. (1996). The influence of nitrogen on the elevated CO2 response in field-grown rice. Functional Plant Biology, 23(1), 45–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society for Plant Physiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environment and Sustainable DevelopmentCentral University of GujaratGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture (CESCRA)ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Division of Plant PhysiologyICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations