Self-Ratings of Personality Pathology: Insights Regarding Their Validity and Treatment Utility
- 13 Downloads
Purpose of review
The validity of self-ratings of personality pathology often is questioned because personality disorders (PD) historically have been viewed as being characterized by poor insight. However, recent research indicates that PD self-ratings are valid in many ways and have significant clinical utility. Building upon this growing literature, our goal here is to provide practical discussion of how incorporating dimensional PD ratings into assessment protocols can benefit diagnosis and treatment.
We first review evidence suggesting that PD self-ratings are particularly useful for assessing constructs related to individuals’ own subjective experiences (e.g., propensities for experiencing negative mood states). We then highlight research indicating that PD self-ratings (a) change positively with intervention and (b) meaningfully inform diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment outcome. Finally, we illustrate how freely available, well-validated self-report PD measures can be used to efficiently obtain clinically useful information in a manner comprehensible to both practitioners and patients.
Self-ratings of personality pathology are valid and useful in many ways and can be efficiently incorporated into assessment protocols. Key future directions for advancing knowledge of self-report PD assessment include examining the extent to which self-ratings of antagonism—a core PD trait—are accurate across contexts.
KeywordsSelf-report assessment Personality pathology Personality disorder Clinical utility Dimensional models
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Kasey Stanton declares that he has no conflict of interest. Matthew F. D. Brown declares that he has no conflict of interest. Meredith A. Bucher declares that she has no conflict of interest. Caroline Balling declares that she has no conflict of interest. Douglas B. Samuel declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights and informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:• Of major importance
- 3.Diamond D, Yeomans FE, Stern B, Levy KN, Hörz S, Doering S, et al. Transference focused psychotherapy for patients with comorbid narcissistic and borderline personality disorder. Psychoanal Inq. 2013;33:527–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.815087.
- 7.Miller JD, Sleep CE, Lamkin J, Vize C, Campbell WK, Lynam DR. Personality disorder traits: perceptions of likability, impairment, and ability to change as correlates and moderators of desired level. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2018;9:478–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.• Bucher MA, Suzuki T, Samuel DB. A meta-analytic review of personality traits and their associations with mental health treatment outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review. 2019;70:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.04.002 Meta-analytic research indicating that personality traits meaningfully predict treatment outcome in many ways.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Watson D, Clark LA. Personality traits as an organizing framework for personality pathology. Personality and Mental Health Advance online publication doi. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1458.
- 12.Widiger TA, Sellbom M, Chmielewski M, Clark LA, DeYoung CG, Kotov R, et al. Personality in a hierarchical model of psychopathology. Clin Psychol Sci. 2019;7:77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618797105.
- 15.• Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., . . . Zimmerman, M. (2017). The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 454–477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258 Key article presenting a dimensional nosological framework that represents an alternative to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
- 16.• Sleep CE, Lamkin J, Lynam DR, Campbell WK, Miller JD. Personality disorder traits: testing insight regarding presence of traits, impairment, and desire for change. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2019;10:123–31 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/per0000305Recent study demonstrating that individuals possess considerable insight into their own pathological personality traits.
- 21.Hopwood CJ, Morey LC, Edelen MO, Shea MT, Grilo CM, Sanislow CA, et al. A comparison of interview and self-report methods for the assessment of borderline personality disorder criteria. Psychol Assess. 2008;20:81–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3522.214.171.124.
- 25.Allan J, Leeson P, De Fruyt F, Martin S. Application of a 10 week coaching program designed to facilitate volitional personality change: overall effects on personality and the impact of targeting. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring. 2018;16:80–94. https://doi.org/10.24384/000470.Google Scholar
- 27.• Roberts BW, Luo J, Briley DA, Chow PI, Su R, Hill PL. A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin. 2017;143:117–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul000008 Key meta-analytic study indicating that personality traits can be positively changed with intervention.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Hudson NW, Briley DA, Chopik WJ, Derringer J. You have to follow through: attaining behavioral change goals predicts volitional personality change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Advance online publication. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000221.
- 32.Ozer DJ, Benet-Martínez V. Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:401–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Samuel DB, Sanislow CA, Hopwood CJ, Shea MT, Skodol AE, Morey LC, et al. Convergent and incremental predictive validity of clinician, self-report, and structured interview diagnoses for personality disorders over 5 years. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013;81:650–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032813.
- 35.Bach B, Markon K, Simonsen E, Krueger RF. Clinical utility of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders: six cases from practice. J Psychiatr Pract. 2015;21:3–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pra.0000460618.02805.ef.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Herpertz SC, Huprich SK, Bohus M, Chanen A, Goodman M, Mehlum L, et al. The challenge of transforming the diagnostic system of personality disorders. J Personal Disord. 2017;31:577–89. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2017_31_338.
- 40.Tyrer P, Mulder R, Kim YR, Crawford MJ. The development of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: an amalgam of science, pragmatism, and politics. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:481–502. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Butcher JN, Graham JR, Ben-Porath YS, Tellegen A, Dahlstrom WG, Kaemmer B. MMPI–2: manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Rev. ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 46.Maples JL, Guan L, Carter NT, Miller JD. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychol Assess. 2014;26:1070–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.• Waszczuk, M. A., Zimmerman, M., Ruggero, C., Li, K., MacNamara, A., Weinberg, A., . . . Kotov, R. (2017). What do clinicians treat: diagnoses or symptoms? The incremental validity of a symptom-based, dimensional characterization of emotional disorders in predicting medication prescription patterns. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 79, 80–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.04.004 Key study indicating that psychiatric medication prescription corresponds more closely with homogeneous symptom dimensions than heterogenous diagnostic categories.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Stanton K, McDonnell CG, Hayden EP, Watson D. Transdiagnostic approaches to psychopathology measurement: recommendations for measure selection, data analysis, and participant recruitment: Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Advance online publication; 2019.Google Scholar