Advertisement

Current Oral Health Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 169–177 | Cite as

Smear Layer-Deproteinization: Improving the Adhesion of Self-Etch Adhesive Systems to Caries-Affected Dentin

  • Keiichi Hosaka
  • Taweesak Prasansuttiporn
  • Ornnicha Thanatvarakorn
  • Sitthikorn Kunawarote
  • Masahiro Takahashi
  • Richard M. Foxton
  • Junji Tagami
  • Masatoshi Nakajima
Dental Restorative Materials (M Özcan, Section Editor)
  • 34 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Dental Restorative Materials

Abstract

Purpose of review

This paper reviews a new method of dentin surface modification, smear layer-deproteinization for self-etch adhesive systems, particularly in relation to improving the adhesion to caries-affected dentin.

Recent Findings

Remnants of smear debris, which forms hybridized smear layer with self-etch adhesives, can prevent monomer infiltration and interfere with the chemical interaction of adhesive monomers and the underlying dentin. The hybridized smear layer weakens the physical and chemical properties of the resin-dentin hybridized complex both immediately and over time. Smear layer-deproteinization with NaOCl and HOCl solutions can improve the quality of resin-dentin interface of self-etch adhesives through elimination of the hybridized smear layer, development of monomer infiltration, and enhancement of the chemical interaction of adhesive monomers with hydroxyapatite due to an increase in the mineral/organic ratio on the dentin surface. These positive effects are influenced by the types of oxidizing solution and their application time and also depend upon the adhesive materials used because compromising effects of residual oxidized-byproducts at the dentin surface on the polymerization behavior of the adhesives are different between the materials. However, applying antioxidant/reducing agents can eliminate this problem.

Summary

Smear layer-deproteinization is more effective for improving the bonding efficacy of self-etch adhesives to caries-affected dentin than normal dentin because caries-affected dentin produces a thicker organic-rich smear layer. Smear layer-deproteinization with HOCl solution, which has a rapid and broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity with less irritating and sensitizing properties, along with the subsequent application of antioxidant/reducing agents could enhance the longevity of composite restoration with self-etch adhesives.

Keywords

Self-etch adhesive Smear layer Smear layer-deproteinization Oxidizing solution Antioxidant/reducing agent Caries-affected dentin 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Tagami J. Effects of different burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching priming systems. Oper Dent. 2001;26:370–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mahdan MHA, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Combined effect of smear layer characteristics with hydrostatic pulpal pressure on dentine bond strength of HEMA-free and -containing one-step adhesives. J Dent. 2013;41:861–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shinoda Y, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Otsuki M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of smear layer characteristics on dentin bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(4):501–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tay FR, Pashely DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17:293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suyama Y, Lührs AK, De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Yamada T, et al. Potential smear layer interference with bonding of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15:317–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, et al. Dentin-smear remains at self-etch adhesive interface. Dent Mater. 2014;30(10):1147–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spencer P, Wang Y, Walker MP, Swafford JR. Molecular structure of acid-etched dentin smear layers—in situ study. J Dent Res. 2001;80:1802–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    •• Thanatvarakorn O, Nakajima M, Prasansuttiporn T, Ichinose S, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of smear layer deproteinizing on rein-dentine interface with self-etch adhesive. J Dent. 2014;42:298–304. This article demonstrate that smear layer-deproteinizing with NaOCl and HOCl solution improves quality of the resin-dentin interface of a 2-step self-etch adhesive, eliminating hybridized smear layer, in which HOCl treatment was more effective than NaOCl treatment. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    •• Thanatvarakorn O, Prasansuttiporn T, Thitthaweerat S, Foxton RM, Ichinose S, Tagami J, et al. Smear layer deproteinizing improves on bonding of one-step self-etch adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2018;34(3):434–41. This article clearly demonstrate that HOCl-smear layer-deproteinizing along with the subsequent application of a reducing agent improves dentin bonding of current 1-step self-etch adheisves. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mountouris G, Silikas N, Eliades G. Effect of sodium hypochlorite treatment on the molecular composition and morphology of human coronal dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6(3):175–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou L, Wang Y, Yang HY, Guo J, Tay RF, Huang C. Effect chemical interaction on the bonding strengths of self-etching adhesives to deproteinised dentine. J Dent. 2015;43:973–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kambara K, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Takahashi M, Thanatvarakorn O, Ichinose S, et al. Effect of smear layer treatment on dentin bond of self-adhesive cements. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(6):980–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang L, Bassiri M, Najafi R, Najafi K, Yang J, Khosrovi B, et al. Hypochlorous acid as a potential wound care agent: part I. Stabilized hypochlorous acid: a component of the inorganic armamentarium of innate immunity. J Burns Wounds. 2007;6:e5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fukuzaki S. Mechanisms of actions of sodium hypochlorite in cleaning and disinfection processes. Biocontrol Sci. 2006;11(4):147–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Albrich JM, McCarthy CA, Hurst JK. Biological reactivity of hypochlorous acid: implications for microbicidal mechanisms of leukocyte myeloperoxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78(1):210–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    White C. Handbook of chlorination and alternative disinfectants. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abdul-Baki AA. Pitfalls in using sodium hypochlorite as a seed disinfectant in C incorporation studies. Plant Physiol. 1974;53(5):768–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guentzel JL, Liang Lam K, Callan MA, Emmons SA, Dunham VL. Reduction of bacteria on spinach, lettuce, and surfaces in food service areas using neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water. Food Microbiol. 2008;25(1):36–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    •• Kunawarote S, Nakajima M, Shida K, Kitasako Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of dentin pretreatment with mild acidic HOCl solution on microtensile bond strength and surface pH. J Dent. 2010;38(3):261–8. This article represents the first study to highlight HOCl solution as a pretreatment agent with dentin bonding of self-etch adhesives. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gu LS, Huang XQ, Griffin B, Bergeron BR, Pashley DH, Niu LN, et al. Primum non nocere—the effects of sodium hypochlorite on dentin as used in endodontics. Acta Biomater. 2017;61:144–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    •• Taniguchi G, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Iwamoto N, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, et al. Improving the effect of NaOCl pretreatment on bonding to caries-affected dentin using self-etch adhesives. J Dent. 2009;37(10):769–75. This article brings the first insight concerning smear layer-deproteinizing for bonding of self-etch adhesives to caries-affected dentin. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lai SC, Mak YF, Cheung GS, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, et al. Reversal of compromised bonding to oxidized etched dentin. J Dent Res. 2001;80:1919–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morris MD, Lee KW, Agee KA, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and RC-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod. 2001;27:753–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prasansuttiporn T, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Scrubbing effect of self-etching adhesives on bond strength to NaOCl-treated dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14(2):121–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    •• Prasansuttiporn T, Nakajima M, Kunawarote S, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of reducing agents on bond strength to NaOCl-treated dentin. Dent Mater. 2011;27(3):229–34. This article provides important information related to reversal effect of antioxidant/reducing agents on compromised bonding to NaOCl-treated dentin. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pashely DH, Tay F, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho R. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004;83:216–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, di Hipolito V, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, et al. Chlorhexidine preserves dentin bond in vitro. J Dent Res. 2007;86:90–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Prasansuttiporn T, Thanatvarakorn O, Tagami J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M. Bonding durability of a self-etch adhesive to normal vs smear layer-deproteinized dentin: effect of reducing agent and plant extract antoxidant. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19:253–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    •• Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, et al. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesives. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1679–88. This article is a classical study about bonding to caries-affected dentin. It is the first study to reduce bond strength to caries-affected dentin with thick and poor hybrid layer formation. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nakajima M, Ogata M, Okuda M, Tagami J, Sano H, Pashley DH. Bonding to caries-affected dentin using self-etching primers. Am J Dent. 1999;12:309–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nakajima M, Sano H, Zheng L, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effect of moist vs. dry bonding to normal vs. caries-affected dentin using Scotchbond multi-purpose plus. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1298–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Bond strengths of single-bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent. 2000;25:2–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J, Nishitani Y, Yamada T, Itou K, et al. Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res. 2001;81:556–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ceballos L, Camejo DG, Fuentes MV, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, et al. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch and self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentine. J Dent. 2003;31:469–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arrais CAG, Giannini M, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Effect of additional and extended acid etching on bonding to caries-affected dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112:458–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nakajima M, Kitasako Y, Okuda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Elemental distributions and microtensile bond strength of adhesive interface to normal and caries-affected dentin. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2005;72B:268–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Say EC, Nakajima M, Senawongse P, Soyman M, Ozer F, Tagami J. Bonding to sound vs. caries-affected dentin using photo and dual-cure adhesive. Oper Dent. 2005;30:90–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Yamauti M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Bonding durability of self-etching primer system to normal and caries-affected dentin under hydrostatic pulpal pressure in vitro. Am J Dent. 2006;19:147–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    •• Nakajima M, Kunawarote S, Prasansuttiporn T, Tagami J. Bonding to caries-affected dentin. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2011;47(2):102–14. This review article gives valuable and detailed information related to bonding mechanism to caries-affected dentin. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Erhardt MCG, Toledano M, Osorio R, Pimenta LA. Histomorphologic characterization and bond strength evaluation of caries-affected dentin/resin interfaces: effect of long-term water exposure. Dent Mater. 2008;24:786–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int. 1993;24(9):618–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kunawarote S, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Pretreatment effect of mildly acidic hypochlorous acid on adhesion to caries-affected dentin using a self-etch adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(1):86–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Joves GJ, Inoue G, Nakashima S, Sadr A, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Mineral density, morphology and bond strength of natural versus artificial caries-affected dentin. Dent Mater J. 2013;32:138–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    De Carvalho FG, Puppin-Rontani J, Dos Santos RL, Carlo HL, Bonan PR, Garcia-Godoy F, et al. In vitro effect of S. mutans biofilm on fluoride/MDPB-containing adhesive system bonded to caries-affected primary dentin. Am J Dent. 2014;27(5):227–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lenzi TL, Tedesco TK, Calvo AF, Ricci HA, Hebling J, Raggio DP. Does the method of caries induction influence the bond strength to dentin of primary teeth? J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(4):333–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Peixoto AC, Bicalho AA, Isolan CP, Maske TT, Moraes RR, Cenci MS, et al. Bonding of adhesive luting agents to caries-affected dentin induced by a microcosm biofilm model. Oper Dent. 2015;40(3):E102–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nicoloso GF, Antoniazzi BF, Lenzi TL, Soares FZ, Rocha RO. Is there a best protocol to optimize bond strength of a universal adhesive to artificially induced caries-affected primary or permanent dentin? J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(5):441–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, Rocha RO, Soares F. Degradation of multimode adhesive system bond strength to artificial caries-affected dentin due to water storage. Oper Dent. 2018;43(2):E92–E101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent. 1998;26:311–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater. 2007;23:2–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kopperud SE, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I. Longevity of posterior dental restortions and reasons for failure. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120:539–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gordan VV, Riley JL III, Geraldeli S, Rindal DB, Qvist V, Fellows JL, et al. Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in the dental practice-based research network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143:593–601.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Diercke K, Lussi A, Kersten T, Seemann R. Isolated development of inner (wall) caries like lesions in a bacterial-based in vitro model. Clin Oral Investg. 2009;13:439–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keiichi Hosaka
    • 1
  • Taweesak Prasansuttiporn
    • 2
  • Ornnicha Thanatvarakorn
    • 3
  • Sitthikorn Kunawarote
    • 2
  • Masahiro Takahashi
    • 1
  • Richard M. Foxton
    • 4
  • Junji Tagami
    • 1
  • Masatoshi Nakajima
    • 1
  1. 1.Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of DentistryChiangmai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  3. 3.Faculty of DentistryBangkokthonburi UniversityBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Restorative Dentistry, King’s College London Dental Institute at Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals, King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations