CAD/CAM and 3D-printing Applications for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
- 218 Downloads
Purpose of Review
CAD/CAM and 3D-printing are emerging manufacturing technologies in dentistry. In the field of alveolar ridge augmentation, graft customization utilizing these technologies can result in significant reduction of surgical time. A review of the literature on materials, techniques, and applications of CAD/CAM and 3D-printing available for alveolar ridge augmentation was performed.
CAD/CAM applications for milling of customized block grafts of allogeneic, xenogeneic, and alloplastic origins have been reported, and currently only limited products are commercially available. 3D-printing applications are limited to alloplastic graft materials and containment shells, and have been mostly used in animal studies for optimizing biomaterials’ properties.
While current data support the potential use of CAD/CAM and 3D-printing for graft customization for alveolar ridge augmentation procedures, additional research is needed on predictability and long-term stability of the grafted sites.
KeywordsCAD/CAM 3D-printing Ridge augmentation Guided bone regeneration Block graft
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 2.Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Oral Health Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009; 105:CD003607.Google Scholar
- 5.Urban IA, Lozada JL, Jovanovic SA, Nagursky H, Nagy K. Vertical ridge augmentation with titanium-reinforced, dense-PTFE membranes and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 19 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:185–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Urban IA, Monje A, Lozada JL, Wang H-L. Long-term evaluation of peri-implant bone level after reconstruction of severely atrophic edentulous maxilla via vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration in combination with sinus augmentation: a case series with 1 to 15 years of loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19:46–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.•• Schlee M, Rothamel D. Ridge augmentation using customized allogenic bone blocks: proof of concept and histological findings. 2013;Implant Dent, 22:212–8. Proof-of-concept case series utilizing CAD/CAM milled allogeneic cancellous bone blocks for vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation. Google Scholar
- 13.Figliuzzi M, Mangano FG, Fortunato L, De Fazio R, Macchi A, Iezzi G, et al. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with custom-made, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:856–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Mangano FG, Zecca PA, van Noort R, Apresyan S, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, et al. Custom-made computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing biphasic calcium-phosphate scaffold for augmentation of an atrophic mandibular anterior ridge. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:941265–11.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.• Tamimi F, Torres J, Gbureck U, Lopez-Cabarcos E, Bassett DC, Alkhraisat MH, et al. Craniofacial vertical bone augmentation: a comparison between 3D printed monolithic monetite blocks and autologous onlay grafts in the rabbit. Biomaterials. 2009;30:6318–26. Animal study showing that 3D-printed monolithic monetite block grafts have the potential to be used as an alternative to autogenous block grafts. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.• Tamimi F, Torres J, Al-Abedalla K, Lopez-Cabarcos E, Alkhraisat MH, Bassett DC, et al. Osseointegration of dental implants in 3D-printed synthetic onlay grafts customized according to bone metabolic activity in recipient site. Biomaterials. 2014;35:5436–45. 3D-printed alloplastic blocks utilized to show that different macrogeometry designs can influence the bone formation pattern. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar