A Systematic Review of Renal Function Estimation Equations
- 26 Downloads
Purpose of Review
This review summarizes the development of various renal function estimation equations and their use in the clinical and drug development space today. We provide a review of recent literature published regarding their concordance and accuracy as compared to measured renal function by way of creatinine clearance (CrCl) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in staging chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dose adjusting renally eliminated drugs.
The choice of specific renal function estimation equations has been a topic of much debate. While clinical guidelines are continuously updated, product labels contain potentially different recommendations. Overall, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) are found to have higher concordance with one another than either equation with Cockcroft-Gault (CG). Although many studies assessing the accuracy of estimation equations found CKD-EPI to be closest to measured GFR, most labs are still reporting CG and MDRD as an assessment of renal function. Each of these equations have been developed in different patient populations and include different variables which makes it critical to understand and address potential discrepancies when using them to stage patients with CKD or dose adjust renally eliminated drugs.
An understanding of the development and accuracy of renal function estimation equations is required to use them appropriately in clinic. As clinical and drug development guidelines continue to be updated and new products are undergoing development, further study is required to come to some agreement regarding the use of these equations in both environments.
KeywordsRenal function Chronic kidney disease Cockcroft-gault Modified diet in renal disease Chronic kindey disease epidemiology
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors received no financial support in the writing of this manuscript. All authors are employees of Merck & Co., Inc. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the company who employs them.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Rahman M, Shad F, Smith MC (2012) Acute kidney injury: a guide to diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 86(7):631–639Google Scholar
- 2.Inker LA, Astor BC, Fox CH, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002(63):S1–S266.Google Scholar
- 3.United States Renal Data System. 2018 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Bethesda, MD. 2018.Google Scholar
- 4.National Kidney Foundation. http://www.kidney.org (2015). Accessed 15 Apr 2019.
- 9.Orlando R, Floreani M, Padrini R, Palatini P. Determination of inulin clearance by bolus intravenous injection in healthy subjects and ascitic patients: equivalence of systemic and renal clearances as glomerular filtration markers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;46:605–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00824.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Delanaye P, Ebert N, Melsom T, Gaspari F, Mariat C, Cavalier E, et al. Iohexol plasma clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate in clinical practice and research: a review. Part 1: how to measure glomerular filtration rate with iohexol? Clin Kidney J. 2016;9:682–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw070.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, Fleming J, Greenberg N, Greene T, et al. Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the laboratory working group of the national kidney disease education program. Clin Chem. 2006;52:5–18. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.0525144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Miller WG, Myers GL, Ashwood ER, et al. Creatinine measurement: state of the art in accuracy and interlaboratory harmonization. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:297–304. https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165(2005)129<297:CMSOTA>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Delanghe JR, Cobbaert C, Galteau MM, Harmoinen A, Jansen R, Kruse R, et al. Trueness verification of actual creatinine assays in the European market demonstrates a disappointing variability that needs substantial improvement. An international study in the framework of the EC4 creatinine standardization working group. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46:1319–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Moller E, McIntosh JF, Van Slyke DD. Studies of urea excretion. II: relationship between urine volume and the rate of urea excretion by normal adults. J Clin Invest 1928:6(3):427–465. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI100206/.
- 31.Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for industry: pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired renal function—study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. 2010. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm204959.pdf. Accessed January 17, 2019.
- 32.European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of medicinal products in patients with decreased renal function. 2016. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2016/02/WC500200841.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2018.
- 35.Dantec A, Selistre L, Lemoine S, Buron F, de Souza VC, Rimmelé T, et al. Performances of creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients: a single center cohort study. Transpl Int. 2019;32(1):75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Dou Y, Sun X, Liu D, Zhang L, Xiao J, Cheng G, et al. Accuracy of glomerular filtration rate equations for chronic kidney disease patients at the G3a stage: a single-center cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2400-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.Funakoshi Y, Fujiwara Y, Kiyota N, Mukohara T, Shimada T, Toyoda M, et al. Validity of new methods to evaluate renal function in cancer patients treated with cisplatin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Feb;77(2):281–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-2966-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 39.Jalalonmuhali M, Peng N, Kun L. Comparative performance of creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate equations in the Malays: a pilot study in tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Int J Nephrol. 2017;2017:2901581–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2901581.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.Kakde S, Alexander S, David VG, Jacob S, Mohapatra A, Valson AT, et al. Relationship of creatinine and cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rates with measured glomerular filtration rate in healthy kidney donors from South Asia. Indian J Nephrol. 2018;28(5):345–50. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijn.IJN_249_17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 42.Lindberg L, K Brødbæk, Hägerström EG, et al. Comparison of methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in head and neck cancer patients treated with cisplatin. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2017:77(4):237–246. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2017.1298001.
- 43.Moodley N, Hariparshad S, Peer F, Gounden V. Evaluation of the CKD-EPI creatinine based glomerular filtration rate estimating equation in Black African and Indian adults in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Clin Biochem. 2018;59:43–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.06.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.• Schwandt A, Denkinger M, Fasching P, et al. Comparison of MDRD, CKD-EPI, and Cockcroft-Gault equation in relation to measured glomerular filtration rate among a large cohort with diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2017;31(9):1376–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.06.016 This study provided a comparison of three renal function estimation equations in a large cohort of patients in which CKD is commonly found. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 46.van Rijn M, Metzger M, Flamant M, et al. Performance of creatinine-based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate changes over time. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy278.
- 48.Bustos-Guadaño F, Martín-Calderón JL, Criado-Álvarez JJ, Muñoz-Jara R, Cantalejo-Gutiérrez A, Mena-Moreno MC. Glomerular filtration rate estimation in people older than 85: comparison between CKD-EPI, MDRD-IDMS and BIS1 equations. Nefrologia. 2017;37(2):172–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2016.10.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49.Chudek J, Kolonko A, Owczarek AJ, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Broczek K, Skalska A, et al. Clinical factors increasing discrepancies of renal function assessment with MDRD and Cockcroft–Gault equations in old individuals. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018;9(5):713–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-018-0076-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 51.Czyżewski Ł, Wyzgał J, Czyżewska E, Kurowski A, Sierdziński J, Łabuś A, et al. Performance of the MDRD, CKD-EPI, and Cockcroft-Gault formulas in relation to nutritional status in stable renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2016 Jun;48(5):1494–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.01.083.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52.Dinsa H, Teshome N, Berha AB. Concordance between modification of diet in renal disease, chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration and Cockcroft-Gault equations in patients with chronic kidney disease at St. Paul’s hospital millennium medical college, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):368. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0783-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 53.Guerville F, Roubaud-Baudron C, Duc S, Salles N, Rainfray M, Bourdel-Marchasson I. Discrepancy between equations estimating kidney function in geriatric care: a study of implications for drug prescription. Drugs Aging. 2019;36(2):155–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0618-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 59.Malavasi VL, Pettorelli D, Fantecchi E, Zoccali C, Laronga G, Trenti T, et al. Variations in clinical management of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation according to different equations for estimating renal function: post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort. Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;13(7):1059–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-018-1857-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 60.Omuse G, Maina D, Mwangi J, et al. Comparison of equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in screening for chronic kidney disease in asymptomatic black Africans: a cross sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):369. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0788-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 62.Rhee J, Kwon JM, Han SH, et al. Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations for estimating glomerular filtration rates in cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2017;36(4):342–8. https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.2017.36.4.342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 66.Indicator details: estimating equations used by laboratories reporting eGFR. https://nccd.cdc.gov/ckd/detail.aspx?QNum=Q226. (Accessed 20 Jan 2019).
- 67.•• Andrade JG, Hawkins NM, Fordyce CB, et al. Variability in non-vitamin K antagonist Oral anticoagulants dose adjustment in atrial fibrillation patients with renal dysfunction: the influence of renal function estimation formulae. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(8):1010–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.04.019 This article compared three estimation equations in predicting clearance of oral anticoagulants and provided a summary of the importance of finding the most accurate equation for a specific drug. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 68.•• Palacio-Lacambra ME, Comas-Reixach I, Blanco-Grau A, et al. Comparison of the Cockcroft–Gault, MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for estimating ganciclovir clearance. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(9):2120–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13647 This article compared three estimation equations in predicting ganciclovir clearance and provided a summary of the importance of finding the most accurate equation for a specific drug. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 69.Vancocin (vancomycin) [package insert]. Baudette, MN: ANI Pharmaceuticals; 2017.Google Scholar