Advertisement

Advances in Manufacturing

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 199–208 | Cite as

Flow correction control with electromagnetically induced preform resting process

  • Mohsen PoorzeinolabedinEmail author
  • Kemal Levend Parnas
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Resin flow correction control with electromagnetic field source, a new variation of the vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process called electromagnetically induced preform resting (EIPR) for dynamical resin flow controlling is introduced to manipulate the flow front and local permeability to prevent the formation of dry spots. This paper proposes an active and real-time flow control approach that is implemented during the composite laminate infusion. The EIPR process applies an electromagnetic field source to pinch (raise) and vibrate the upper flexible mold to rest the fiber preform and increase the local permeability. Vibration action delivers the fluid through the preform. The EIPR process includes a new and creative upper flexible vacuum bag with embedded elements to lift and create local vibrations via an automated gantry system. The control methodology is performed by tracking the flow front with a real-time correction. System capability is demonstrated with three configurations of preform of different preform permeabilities in each experiment. A low permeability preform is employed in these configurations to disturb the flow pattern and cause an artificial problem or pseudo problem during the filling process. The results indicate that this system fills the mold completely and reduces the filling time without any dry spots and therefore creates no waste material.

Keywords

Resin flow Process monitoring On-line flow control Vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) 

References

  1. 1.
    Smooth-on (2019) www.smooth-on.com. Accessed 9 May 2019
  2. 2.
    Brouwer WD, Van Herpt ECFC, Labordus M (2003) Vacuum injection moulding for large structural applications. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 34(6):551–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams CD, Grove SM, Summerscales J (1998) The compression response of fibre-reinforced plastic plates during manufacture by the resin infusion under flexible tooling method. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 29(1–2):111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poorzeinolabedin M, Parnas L, Dashatan SH (2014) Resin infusion under flexible tooling process and structural design optimization of the complex composite part. Mater Des 64(8):450–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bayldon JM, Daniel IM (2009) Flow modeling of the VARTM process including progressive saturation effects. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 40(8):1044–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hsiao KT, Heider D (2012) Vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) in polymer matrix composites. In: Manufacturing techniques for polymer matrix composites (PMCs). Woodhead Publishing Limited, Sawston, p 310–347Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hancox NL (1977) The effects of flaws and voids on the shear properties of CFRP. J Mater Sci 12(5):884–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu X, Chen F (2016) A review of void formation and its effects on the mechanical performance of carbon fiber reinforced plastic. Eng Trans 64(1):33–51Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson RJ, Pitchumani R (2008) Active control of reactive resin flow in a vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process. J Compos Mater 42(12):1205–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matsuzaki R, Kobayashi S, Todoroki A et al (2011) Control of resin flow/temperature using multifunctional interdigital electrode array film during a VARTM process. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 42(7):782–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alms JB, Glancey JL, Advani SG (2010) Mechanical properties of composite structures fabricated with the vacuum induced preform relaxation process. Compos Struct 92(12):2811–2816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nielsen DR, Pitchumani R (2002) Control of flow in resin transfer molding with real-time preform permeability estimation. Polym Compos 23(6):1087–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Konstantopoulos S, Fauster E, Schledjewski R (2014) Monitoring the production of FRP composites: a review of in-line sensing methods. Express Polym Lett 8(11):823–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yenilmez B, Murat Sozer E (2009) A grid of dielectric sensors to monitor mold filling and resin cure in resin transfer molding. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 40(4):476–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schmachtenberg E, Schulte Zur Heide J, Töpker J (2005) Application of ultrasonics for the process control of resin transfer moulding (RTM). Polym Test 24(3):330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carlone P, Rubino F, Paradiso V et al (2018) Multi-scale modeling and online monitoring of resin flow through dual-scale textiles in liquid composite molding processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5–8):2215–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matsuzaki R, Shiota M (2017) Data assimilation for three-dimensional flow monitoring in non-flat composite structures during vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding: a numerical study. Compos Struct 172:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Devillard M, Hsiao KT, Advani SG (2005) Flow sensing and control strategies to address race-tracking disturbances in resin transfer molding—Part II: automation and validation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 36:1581–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nielsen DR, Pitchumani R (2002) Control of flow in resin transfer molding with real-time preform permeability estimation. Polym Compos 23(6):1087–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nielsen DR, Pitchumani R (2002) Closed-loop flow control in resin transfer molding using real-time numerical process simulations. Compos Sci Technol 62(2):283–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nalla AR, Fuqua M, Glancey J et al (2007) A multi-segment injection line and real-time adaptive, model-based controller for vacuum assisted resin transfer molding. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 38(3):1058–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Modi D, Correia N, Johnson M et al (2007) Active control of the vacuum infusion process. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 38(5):1271–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson RJ, Pitchumani R (2003) Enhancement of flow in VARTM using localized induction heating. Compos Sci Technol 63(15):2201–2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matsuzaki R, Kobayashi S, Todoroki A et al (2013) Flow control by progressive forecasting using numerical simulation during vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 45:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alms J, Advani SG (2007) Simulation and experimental validation of flow flooding chamber method of resin delivery in liquid composite molding. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 38(10):2131–2141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alms JB, Advani SG, Glancey JL (2011) Liquid composite molding control methodologies using vacuum induced preform relaxation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 42(1):57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Domínguez JC, Oliet M, Alonso MV et al (2013) Structural, thermal and rheological behavior of a bio-based phenolic resin in relation to a commercial resol resin. Ind Crops Prod 42:308–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vernet N, Ruiz E, Advani S et al (2014) Experimental determination of the permeability of engineering textiles: benchmark II. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 61:172–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Leopar Composite Engineering and Consulting Services Ltd.AnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTED UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations