Advertisement

Advances in Manufacturing

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 155–173 | Cite as

A comprehensive review of extrusion-based additive manufacturing processes for rapid production of metallic and ceramic parts

  • Kedarnath RaneEmail author
  • Matteo Strano
Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

The extrusion-based additive manufacturing (EAM) technique is recently being employed for rapid production of metals and ceramic components. This technique involves extruding the metal or ceramic material in solid powder form mixed with a binder (i.e., an expendable viscous fluid), which is removed from the part after 3D printing. These technologies rely on the large design freedom allowed and the cost efficiency advantage over alternative metal additive manufacturing processes that are based on high energy beams, such as laser or electron beams. The EAM of metals and ceramics is not yet widespread, but published scientific and technical literature on it is rapidly growing. However, this literature is still less extensive than that on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) of plastics or the selective laser melting (SLM) of metals. This paper aims at filling this gap. FDM and powder injection molding are identified as preceding or enabling technologies for EAM. This paper systematically reviews all aspects of the feedstock EAM processes used for production of complex-shaped parts. The unique characteristics and advantages of these processes are also discussed with respect to materials and process steps. In addition, the key process parameters are explained to illustrate the suitability of the EAM process for diverse application domains.

Keywords

Feedstock extrusion Rapid production Complex-shaped metallic Ceramic parts 

References

  1. 1.
    ISO/ASTM 52900:2015(E) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing. ASTM 2015Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deckers J, Vleugels J, Kruth JP (2014) Additive manufacturing of ceramics: a review. J Ceram Sci Tech 5(4):245–260Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turner BN, Gold SA (2015) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness. Rapid Prototyp J 21(3):250–261Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turner N, Strong B, Gold S (2014) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):192–204Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karunakaran KP, Alain Bernard, Suryakumar S et al (2012) Rapid manufacturing of metallic objects. Rapid Prototyp J 18(4):264–280Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lewis JA, Smay JE, Stuecker J et al (2006) Direct ink writing of three-dimensional ceramic structures. J Am Ceram Soc 89(12):3599–3609Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Cano S, Schuschnigg S et al (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic and ceramic components by the material extrusion of highly-filled polymers: a review and future perspectives. Materials 11(5):840.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050840 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) Additive manufacturing methods and modeling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(1–4):389–405Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carneiro OS, Silva AF, Gomes R (2015) Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Mater Des 83(15):768–776Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bottini A, Boschetto L (2014) Accuracy prediction in fused deposition modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(5–8):913–928Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ning F, Cong W, Qiu J et al (2015) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos B Eng 80:369–378Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brünler R, Aibibu D, Wöltje M et al (2017) In silico modeling of structural and porosity properties of additive manufactured implants for regenerative medicine. Mater Sci Eng C 76:810–817Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    xjet3d.com, XJet’s system. Accessed on 06 Sept 2017Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miyanaji H, Zhang S, Lassell A et al (2016) Process development of porcelain ceramic material with binder jetting process for dental applications. JOM 68(3):831–841Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    King WE, Anderson AT, Ferencz RM et al (2015) Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges. Appl Phys Rev 2(4):41304Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khoshnevis B, Zhang J (2015) Selective separation sintering (SSS) A new layer based additive manufacturing approach for metals and ceramics. In: AIAA SPACE conference and expositionGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gallo D, Biamino S, Fino P et al (2017) An overview of additive manufacturing of titanium components by directed energy deposition: microstructure and mechanical properties. Appl Sci 7(9):883.  https://doi.org/10.3390/app7090883 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rane K, Cataldo S, Parenti P et al (2018) Rapid production of hollow SS316 profiles by extrusion based additive manufacturing. AIP Conf Proc 1960(1):140014.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5035006 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stavropoulos P, Foteinopoulos P (2018) Modelling of additive manufacturing processes: a review and classification. Manuf Rev 5(2):1–26Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Atzeni E, Salmi A (2012) Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9–12):1147–1155Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    German RM (2008) PIM breaks the $1 bn barrier. Metal Powder Rep 63(3):8–10Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gonçalves A (2001) Metallic powder injection molding using low pressure. J Mater Process Technol 118(1–3):193–198Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    German RM, Bose A (1997) Injection molding of metals and ceramics. Princeton, Metals Powder Industries FederationGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jabbari A, Abrinia K (2018) Developing thixo-extrusion process for additive manufacturing of metals in semi-solid state. J Manuf Process 35:664–671Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tseng JW, Hsu CK (1999) Cracking defect and porosity evolution during thermal debinding in ceramic injection molding. Ceram Int 25(5):461–466Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Finke S, Feenstra FK (2002) Solid freeform fabrication by extrusion and deposition of semi-solid alloys. J Mater Sci 37(15):3101–3106Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luo J, Qi LH, Zhong SY et al (2012) Printing solder droplets for micro devices packages using pneumatic drop-on-demand (DoD) technique. J Mater Process Technol 212(10):2066–2073Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhong SY, Qi LH, Luo J et al (2014) Effect of process parameters on copper droplet ejecting by pneumatic drop-on-demand technology. J Mater Process Technol 214(12):3089–3097Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang D, Qi L, Luo J et al (2017) Direct fabrication of unsupported inclined aluminum pillars based on uniform micro droplets deposition. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 116:18–24Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cesarano J (1998) A review of robocasting technology. In: MRS Proceedings 542:133.  https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-542-133
  33. 33.
    Slots C, Jensen MB, Ditzel N et al (2017) Simple additive manufacturing of an osteoconductive ceramic using suspension melt extrusion. Dental Mater 43(9):198–208Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Travitzky N, Bonet A, Dermeik B et al (2014) Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Adv Eng Mater 16:729–754Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Houmard M, Fu Q, Genet M et al (2013) On the structural, mechanical, and biodegradation properties of HA/β-TCP robocast scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 101:1233–1242Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thomas A, Kolan KC, Leu MC et al (2017) Freeform extrusion fabrication of titanium fiber reinforced 13–93 bioactive glass scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 69:153–162Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang J, Shaw LL, Cameron TB (2006) Solid freeform fabrication of permanent dental restorations via slurry micro-extrusion. J Am Ceram Soc 89(1):346–349Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    I. 3. Bioprinter, Accessed on 25 Sept 2017Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li JP, De Wijn JR, Van Blitterswijk CA et al (2006) Porous Ti6Al4V scaffold directly fabricating by rapid prototyping: preparation and in vitro experiment. Biomaterials 27(8):1223–1235Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sercombe TB, Schaffer GB, Lucia (1999) Freeform fabrication of functional aluminium prototypes using powder metallurgy. J Mater Sci 34(17):4245–4251Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Grida I, Evans JRG (2003) Extrusion freeforming of ceramics through fine nozzles. J Eur Ceram Soc 23(5):629–635Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bellini A, Shor L, Guceri SI (2005) New developments in fused deposition modeling of ceramics. Rapid Prototyp J 11(4):214–220Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lu X, Lee Y, Yang S et al (2008) Fabrication of electromagnetic crystals by extrusion freeforming. Metamaterials 2(1):36–44Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lu X, Lee Y, Yang S et al (2009) Fine lattice structures fabricated by extrusion freeforming: process variables. J Mater Process Technol 209(10):4654–4661Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lu X, Lee Y, Yang S et al (2010) Solvent-based paste extrusion solid freeforming. J Eur Ceram Soc 30(1):1–10Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jafari MA, Han W, Mohammadi F et al (2000) A novel system for fused deposition of advanced multiple ceramics. Rapid Prototyp J 6(3):161–175Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wu G, Langrana NA, Sadanji R et al (2002) Solid freeform fabrication of metal components using fused deposition of metals. Mater Des 23(1):97–105Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vaidyanathan R, Walish J, Lombardi JL et al (2000) The extrusion freeforming of functional ceramic prototypes. JOM 52(12):34–37Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kalita SJ, Bose S, Hosick HL et al (2003) Development of controlled porosity polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling. Mater Sci Eng C 23(5):611–620Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    3devo.com, 3devo.com/next-filament-extruder/. Accessed on 13 Oct 2017Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    The Virtual Foundry. www.thevirtualfoundry.com/showcase/m0mau80bklzxkr50voo7gkvrdqzs38. Accessed on 12 Oct 2017
  52. 52.
    Li JB, Xie ZG, Zhang XH et al (2010) Study of metal powder extrusion and accumulating rapid prototyping. Key Eng Mater 443:81–86Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Holshouser C, Newell C, Palas S et al (2013) Out of bounds additive manufacturing. Adv Mater Process 171(3):15–27Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Annoni M, Giberti H, Strano M (2016) Feasibility study of an extrusion-based direct metal additive manufacturing technique. Proc Manuf 5:916–927Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ren LQ, Zhou XL, Song ZY et al (2017) Process parameter optimization of extrusion-based 3D metal printing utilizing PW-LDPE-SA binder system. Materials 10(3):305.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10030305 Google Scholar
  56. 56.
  57. 57.
  58. 58.
    Tay BY, Loh NH, Tor SB et al (2009) Characterisation of micro gears produced by micro powder injection moulding. Powder Technol 188(3):179–182Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rane KK, Date PP (2014) Rheological investigation of MIM feedstocks for reducing frictional effects during injection moulding. Adv Mater Res 966–967:196–205Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    A. F3049-14 (2014) Standard guide for characterizing properties of metal powders used for additive manufacturing processes. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Thomas-Vielma P, Cervera A, Levenfeld B et al (2008) Production of alumina parts by powder injection molding with a binder system based on high density polyethylene. J Eur Ceram Soc 28(4):763–771Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kiyota Y (1989) Patent US4867943Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kang H, Kitsomboonloha R, Jang J et al (2012) High-performance printed transistors realized using femtoliter gravure-printed sub-10 μm metallic nanoparticle patterns and highly uniform polymer dielectric and semiconductor layers. Adv Mater 24(22):3065–3069Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Maleksaeedi S, Eng H, Wiria FE et al (2014) Property enhancement of 3D-printed alumina ceramics using vacuum infiltration. J Mater Process Technol 214(7):1301–1306Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Asadi-Eydivand M, Solati-Hashjin M, Farzad A et al (2016) Effect of technical parameters on porous structure and strength of 3D printed calcium sulfate prototypes. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 37:57–67Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gaytan SM, Cadena MA, Karim H et al (2015) Fabrication of barium titanate by binder jetting additive manufacturing technology. Ceram Int 41(5):6610–6619Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Farzadi A, Waran V, Solati-Hashjin M et al (2015) Effect of layer printing delay on mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed porous prototypes in bone tissue engineering. Ceram Int 41(7):8320–8330Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Vitorino N, Freitas C, Ribeiro MJ et al (2014) Extrusion of ceramic emulsions: plastic behavior. Appl Clay Sci 101:315–319Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kono T, Horata A, Kondo T (1997) Development of titanium and titanium alloy by metal injection molding process. J Jpn Soc Powder Metall 44:985–992Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wen G, Cao P, Gabbitas B et al (2013) Development and design of binder systems for titanium metal injection molding: an overview. Metall Mater Trans A 44(3):1530–1547Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ahn S, Park SJ, Lee S et al (2009) Effect of powders and binders on material properties and molding parameters in iron and stainless steel powder injection molding process. Powder Technol 193(2):162–169Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Levenfeld B, Varez A, Torralba JM (2002) Effect of residual carbon on the sintering process of M2 high speed steel parts obtained by a modified metal injection molding process. Metall Mater Trans A 33(6):1843–1851Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Moballegh L, Morshedian J, Esfandeh M (2005) Copper injection molding using a thermoplastic binder based on paraffin wax. Mater Lett 59(22):2832–2837Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Suri P, Atre SV, German RM et al (2003) Effect of mixing on the rheology and particle characteristics of tungsten-based powder injection molding feedstock. Mater Sci Eng A 356(1):337–344Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bose A, Schuh CA, Tobia JC et al (2018) Traditional and additive manufacturing of a new tungsten heavy alloy alternative. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater 73:22–28Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Merz L, Rath S, Piotter V et al (2002) Feedstock development for micro powder injection molding. Microsyst Technol 8(2–3):129–132Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Samuel I, Lin E (2001) Near-net-shape forming of zirconia optical sleeves by ceramics injection molding. Ceram Int 27(2):205–214Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Yang WW, Yang KY, Hon MH (2003) Effects of PEG molecular weights on rheological behavior of alumina injection molding feedstocks. Mater Chem Phys 78(2):416–424Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ani S, Muchtar SM, Muhamad A et al (2014) Binder removal via a two-stage debinding process for ceramic injection molding parts. Ceram Int 40(2):2819–2824Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Burkhardt C, Freigassner P, Weber O et al (2016) Fused filament fabrication (FFF) of 316L green parts for the MIM process. In: Proceedings of the world PM2016 congress and exhibition, Hamburg, Germany, 9–13 Oct 2016Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    www.mixer.co.uk/en/product/zx-sigma-mixer-extruder. U. Winkworth Mixer Co. Accessed 04 May 2017
  82. 82.
    Hausnerová B (2011) Powder injection moulding—an alternative processing method for automotive items. In: new trends and development in automotive system engineering. InTech, pp 129–146Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Peng F, Vogt BD, Cakmak M (2018) Complex flow and temperature history during melt extrusion in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 22:197–206Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Northcutt LA, Orski SV, Migler KB et al (2018) Effect of processing conditions on crystallization kinetics during materials extrusion additive manufacturing. Polymer 154:182–187Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Valkenaers H, Vogeler F, Voet A et al (2013) Screw extrusion based 3D printing, a novel additive manufacturing technology. In: International conference on competitive manufacturing (COMA)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Tseng JW, Liu CY, Yen YK et al (2018) Screw extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK. Mater Des 140:209–221Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Pachauri P, Hamiuddin M (2015) Optimization of injection moulding process parameters in MIM for impact toughness of sintered parts. Int J Adv Mater Metall Eng 1:1–11Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Giberti H, Sbaglia L, Silvestri M (2017) Mechatronic design for an extrusion-based additive manufacturing machine. Machines 5(4):29.  https://doi.org/10.3390/machines5040029 Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Rishi O (2013) Feed rate effects in freeform filament extrusion. Dissertation, Rochester Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Fiore E, Giberti H, Sbaglia L (2015) Dimensional synthesis of a 5-DoF parallel kinematic manipulator for a 3D printer. In: 16th international conference on research and education in mechatronics (REM), Bochun Germany, 18–20 Nov 2015Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Giberti H, Fiore E, Sbaglia L (2016) Kinematic synthesis of a new 3D printing solution. In: MATEC Web of conferencesGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Anzalone GC, Zhang CL, Wijnen B et al (2013) A low-cost open-source metal 3-D printer. IEEE Access 1:803–810Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Giberti H, Sbaglia L, Urgo M (2017) A path planning algorithm for industrial processes under velocity constraints with an application to additive manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 43:160–167Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Monzón MD, Gibson I, Benítez AN et al (2013) Process and material behavior modeling for a new design of micro-additive fused deposition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9–12):2717–2726Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Oliveira RVB, Soldi V, Fredel MC et al (2005) Ceramic injection molding: influence of specimen dimensions and temperature on solven debinding kinetics. J Mater Process Technol 160(2):213–220Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Royer A, Barrière T, Gelin JC (2016) Development and characterization of a metal injection molding bio sourced Inconel 718 feedstock based on polyhydroxyalkanoates. Metals 6(4):89.  https://doi.org/10.3390/met6040089 Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Tandon R (2008) Metal injection moulding in encyclopedia of materials science and technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 5439–5442Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Boljanovic V (2010) Powder metallurgy, in metal shaping processes: casting and molding, particulate processing, deformation processes, metal removal. Industrial Press Inc, New York, pp 75–106Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Parenti P, Kuriakose S, Mussi V et al (2017) Green-state micromilling of AISI316L feedstock. In: World congress on micro and nano manufacturing, 27–30 Mar 2017Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Parenti P, Cataldo S, Annoni M (2018) Shape deposition manufacturing of 316L parts via feedstock extrusion and green-state milling. Manuf Lett 18:6–11Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    A. F3091/F3091M-14 (2014) Standard specification for powder bed fusion of plastic materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    A. F3122-14 (2014) Standard guide for evaluating mechanical properties of metal materials made via additive manufacturing processes, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Komineas G, Foteinopoulos P, Papacharalampopoulos A et al (2018) Build time estimation models in thermal extrusion additive manufacturing processes. Proc Manuf 21:647–654Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Ghazanfari A, Li WB, Leu MC et al (2016) A novel extrusion-based additive manufacturing process for ceramic parts. In: 26th annual international solid freeform fabrication symposiumGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Brenken B, Barocio E, Favaloro A et al (2019) Development and validation of extrusion deposition additive manufacturing process simulations. Addit Manuf 25:218–226Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Singh S, Ramakrishna S, Singh R (2017) Material issues in additive manufacturing: a review. J Manuf Process 25:185–200Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Faes M, Valkenaers H, Vogeler F et al (2015) Extrusion-based 3D printing of ceramic components. Proc CIRP 28:76–81Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Bletzinger KU, Ramm E (2001) Structural optimization and form finding of light weight structures. Comput Struct 79(22–25):2053–2062Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Godec D, Guran R et al (2018) 3D printing conditions determination for feedstock used in fused filament fabrication (FFF) of 17-4PH stainless steel parts. Metalurgija 57:117–120Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Moritz T, Partsch U, Ziesche S et al (2014) Additive manufacturing of ceramic components. Mater Process Annu Rep 15:28–31Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Ghazanfari A, Li W, Leu M et al (2017) Mechanical characterization of parts produced by ceramic on-demand extrusion process. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 14(3):486–494Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Li W, Ghazanfari A, McMillen D et al (2017) Fabricating ceramic components with water dissolvable support structures by the ceramic on-demand extrusion process. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 66:225–228Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Lieberwirth C, Harder A, Seitz H (2017) Extrusion based additive manufacturing of metals parts. J Mech Eng Autom 7:79–83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations