Robust AWC design for constrained cascaded linear control system with parametric uncertainties

  • Muntazir HussainEmail author


In this paper robust anti-windup compensator (AWC) design methodology is proposed for linear cascaded systems with parametric perturbation, actuator saturation, and external perturbations. An innovative robust AWC architecture for uncertain linear cascaded systems is presented to compensate the undesirable saturation consequences. By using \(L_2\) gain reduction linear matrix inequality (LMI)-based conditions are derived for calculating the dynamic AWC gains. By means of a Lyapunov stability tool, global sector condition, local sector condition, decoupled architecture, \(L_2\) gain reduction, a region of stability, LMI-based dynamic AWC design methodology is established for linear cascaded systems with parametric uncertainties, actuator saturation, and external perturbations. The proposed results guaranteed the global and local exponential and \(L_2\) exponential stability of the suggested dynamic AWC technique. Along with attaining the windup compensation, our goal is to attain the robustness of the AWC with regard to the system additive uncertainties and exogenous disturbances. The proposed results are employed to mitigate the saturation effects in cascaded temperature control systems and uncoupled ball-and-beam system.


Robust anti-windup compensator Saturation Decoupled architecture Cascaded linear control system Linear matrix inequality 


  1. 1.
    Cao Y-Y, Lin Z, Ward DG (2002) An anti-windup approach to enlarging domain of attraction for linear systems subject to actuator saturation. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47(1):140–145CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hussain M, us Saqib N, Rehan M, Siddique M (2017) Anti-windup compensator synthesis for cascaded linear control system. In: International conference on control, automation and systems (ICCAS), pp 1634–1639Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mehdi N, Rehan M, Malik FM, Bhatti AI, Tufail M (2014) A novel anti-windup framework for cascade control systems: an application to underactuated mechanical systems. ISA Trans 53(3):802–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hussain M, Rehan M (2016) Nonlinear time-delay anti-windup compensator synthesis for nonlinear time-delay systems: a delay-range-dependent approach. Neurocomputing 186:54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turner MC, Herrmann G, Postlethwaite I (2007) Incorporating robustness requirements into antiwindup design. IEEE Trans Autom Control 52(10):1842–1855MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hussain M, Siddique M, Hashmi MU, Raza MT (2018) Controller design for nonlinear time delay distributed control systems subjected to input saturation nonlinearity and disturbances. Int J Dyn Control 7(2):557–566MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rehan M, Ahmed A, Iqbal N (2010) Static and low order anti-windup synthesis for cascade control systems with actuator saturation: an application to temperature-based process control. ISA Trans 49(3):293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmed A, Rehan M, Iqbal N (2010) Robust full order anti-windup compensator design for a class of cascade control systems using lmis. Electr Eng 92(4–5):129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grimm G, Hatfield J, Postlethwaite I, Teel AR, Turner MC, Zaccarian L (2003) Anti-windup for stable linear systems with input saturation: an LMI-based synthesis. IEEE Trans Autom Control 48(9):1509–1525CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tarbouriech S, Garcia G, da Silva Jr JMG, Queinnec I (2011) Stability and stabilization of linear systems with saturating actuators. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao J, Wang J, Park JH, Shen H (2015) Memory feedback controller design for stochastic markov jump distributed delay systems with input saturation and partially known transition rates. Nonlinear Anal Hybrid Syst 15:52–62MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu F, Grigoriadis KM, Packard A (2000) Anti-windup controller design using linear parameter-varying control methods. Int J Control 73(12):1104–1114MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cao Y-Y, Lin Z (2003) Stability analysis of discrete-time systems with actuator saturation by a saturation-dependent Lyapunov function. Automatica 39(7):1235–1241MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mera M, Salgado I (2018) Robust control of linear systems under input saturation using barrier Lyapunov functions. Int J Dyn Control 6(3):1231–1238MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fan G-L, Liang X-G (2014) Gain-scheduled controllers design for interceptor parameter-varying system with multi-saturated constraint. Int J Dyn Control 2(3):354–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Song G, Li T, Hu K, Zheng B-C (2016) Observer-based quantized control of nonlinear systems with input saturation. Nonlinear Dyn 86(2):1157–1169MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang L, Boukas E-K, Haidar A (2008) Delay-range-dependent control synthesis for time-delay systems with actuator saturation. Automatica 44(10):2691–2695MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li H, Wang J, Shi P et al (2016) Output-feedback based sliding mode control for fuzzy systems with actuator saturation. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 24(6):1282–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rehan M, Hong K-S (2013) Decoupled-architecture-based nonlinear anti-windup design for a class of nonlinear systems. Nonlinear Dyn 73(3):1955–1967MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hussain M, us Saqib N, Rehan M (2016) Nonlinear dynamic regional anti-windup compensator (RAWC) schema for constrained nonlinear systems. In: International conference on emerging technologies (ICET). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sarhadi P, Noei AR, Khosravi A (2017) Adaptive \(\mu \)-modification control for a nonlinear autonomous underwater vehicle in the presence of actuator saturation. Int J Dyn Control 5(3):596–603MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hussain M, Rehan M, Ahn CK, Tufail M (2018) Robust anti-windup for one-sided Lipschitz systems subject to input saturation and applications. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 65(12):9706–9716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mulder EF, Tiwari PY, Kothare MV (2009) Simultaneous linear and anti-windup controller synthesis using multiobjective convex optimization. Automatica 45(3):805–811MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bender F, da Silva Jr JG (2012) Output feedback controller design for systems with amplitude and rate control constraints. Asian J Control 14(4):1113–1117MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaya İ, Nalbantoğlu M (2015) Cascade controller design using controller synthesis. In: 2015 19th International conference on system theory, control and computing (ICSTCC). IEEE, pp 32–36Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huang C, Bai Y, Zhu Y (2010) PID controller design for a class of networked cascade control systems. In: 2010 2nd International conference on advanced computer control, vol 1. IEEE, pp 43–47Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ito S, Sato T, Araki N, Konishi Y (2018) Two-loop design for dual-rate cascade system. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(4):581–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu H-N, Wang J-W (2014) Static output feedback control via pde boundary and ode measurements in linear cascaded ode-beam systems. Automatica 50(11):2787–2798MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen Z, Huang J (2004) Dissipativity, stabilization, and regulation of cascade-connected systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 49(5):635–650MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Oh S-K, Jang H-J, Pedrycz W (2009) The design of a fuzzy cascade controller for ball and beam system: a study in optimization with the use of parallel genetic algorithms. Eng Appl Artif Intell 22(2):261–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zheng A, Kothare MV, Morari M (1994) Anti-windup design for internal model control. Int J Control 60(5):1015–1024MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grimm G, Postlethwaite I, Teel AR, Turner MC, Zaccarian L (2001) Linear matrix inequalities for full and reduced order anti-windup synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 2001 American control conference (cat. no. 01CH37148), vol 5. IEEE, pp 4134–4139Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ahmed A, Iqbal N, Khan LA (2009) Design and development of a robust control adjustable electrical dc drive system. In: International Bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology (IBCAST). IEEE, pp 265–270Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Keshmiri M, Jahromi AF, Mohebbi A, Hadi Amoozgar M, Xie W-F (2012) Modeling and control of ball and beam system using model based and non-model based control approaches. Int J Smart Sens Intell Syst 5(1):14–35Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronic EngineeringIQRA UniversityIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations