Advertisement

Enhanced accuracy in reduced order modeling for linear stable\unstable system

  • Sharad Kumar TiwariEmail author
  • Gagandeep Kaur
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

This paper provides a quantitative measure criterion for selection of poles from a higher order model. The selection of poles is important because it determines both the transient and steady-state information of the dynamical system. The new indices specify which poles are dominant even when they are not the slowest. On the basis of important poles contribution to the system poles, they are selected to form cluster centre. Factor division algorithm is applied to compute the coefficient of the numerator polynomial for determining denominator polynomial. This method extended for the reduction of the unstable system via additive decomposition technique. The proposed method not only can cause less dynamic errors, but also yields zero steady-state error. The efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method are demonstrated through benchmark test examples taken from the literature.

Keywords

Order reduction Clustering Dominant pole Factor division algorithm Stable\unstable system 

References

  1. 1.
    Bosley MJ, Lees FP (1972) A survey of simple transfer-function derivations from high-order state-variable models. Automatica 8:765–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ersal T, Fathy HK, Rideout DG et al (2008) A review of proper modeling techniques. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 130:061008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bultheel A, Barel MV (1986) Padé techniques for model reduction in linear system theory: a survey. J Comput Appl Math 14:401–438MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaber SM, Maday Y (2005) Analysis of some Pade–Chebyshev approximants. SIAM J Numer Anal 43:437–454MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen CF, Shieh LS (1970) An algebraic method for control systems design. Int J Control 11:717–739CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parthasarathy R, John S (1978) System reduction using Cauer continued fraction expansion about s = 0 and s = ∞ alternately. Electron Lett 18:9–10Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prasad R, Pal J (1991) Use of continued fraction expansion for stable reduction of linear multivariable systems. Inst Eng India Part Electr Eng Div 72:43Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin PL, Wu YC (1982) Reduction of transfer functions from the stability-equation method and complex curve fitting. J Frankl Inst 314:109–121CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen TC, Chang CY, Han KW (1980) Model reduction using the stability-equation method and the continued-fraction method. Int J Control 32:81–94MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Desai SR, Prasad R (2013) A new approach to order reduction using stability equation and big bang big crunch optimization. Syst Sci Control Eng 1:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu C-C, Shih Y-P (1986) Model reduction via Chebyshev polynomials. Comput Electr Eng 12:89–100CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soloklo HN, Farsangi MM (2013) Chebyshev rational functions approximation for model order reduction using harmony search. Sci Iran 20:771–777Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soloklo HN, Nali O, Farsangi MM (2014) Model reduction by Hermite polynomials and genetic algorithm. J Math Comput Sci 9:188–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wan B-W (1981) Linear model reduction using Mihailov criterion and Padé approximation technique. Int J Control 33:1073–1089CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sinha AK, Pal J (1990) Simulation based reduced order modelling using a clustering technique. Comput Electr Eng 16:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vishwakarma CB, Prasad R (2008) Clustering method for reducing order of linear system using pade approximation. IETE J Res 54:326–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vishwakarma CB, Prasad R (2009) MIMO system reduction using modified pole clustering and genetic algorithm. Model Simul Eng 2009:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Komarasamy R, Albhonso N, Gurusamy G (2011) Order reduction of linear systems with an improved pole clustering. J Vib Control 18:1876–1885MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh J, Chatterjee K, Vishwakarma CB (2015) Reduced order modelling for linear dynamic systems. AMSE J Ser Adv C 70:71–85Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Narwal A, Prasad R (2017) Optimization of LTI systems using modified clustering algorithm. IETE Tech Rev 34:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parmar G, Mukherjee S, Prasad R (2007) System reduction using factor division algorithm and eigen spectrum analysis. Appl Math Model 31:2542–2552CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sikander A, Prasad R (2015) Soft computing approach for model order reduction of linear time invariant systems. Circuits, Syst Signal Process 34:3471–3487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Desai SR, Prasad R (2013) A novel order diminution of LTI systems using big bang big crunch optimization and routh approximation. Appl Math Model 37:8016–8028MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Biradar S, Hote YV, Saxena S (2016) Reduced-order modeling of linear time invariant systems using big bang big crunch optimization and time moment matching method. Appl Math Model 40:7225–7244MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Soloklo HN, Hajmohammadi R, Farsangi MM (2015) Model order reduction based on moment matching using Legendre wavelet and harmony search algorithm. Iran J Sci Technol, Trans Electr Eng 39:39–54Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Salma U, Vaisakh K (2015) Application and comparative analysis of various classical and soft computing techniques for model reduction of MIMO systems. Intell Ind Syst 1:313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Salim R, Bettayeb M (2011) H2 and H∞ optimal model reduction using genetic algorithms. J Frankl Inst 348:1177–1191CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aguirre LA (1993) Quantitative measure of modal dominance for continuous systems. In: Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 2405–2410Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shamash Y (1981) The viability of analytical methods for the reduction of multivariable systems. Proc IEEE 69:1163–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singh J, Vishwakarma CB, Chattterjee K (2016) Biased reduction method by combining improved modified pole clustering and improved Pade approximations. Appl Math Model 40:1418–1426MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tiwari SK, Kaur G (2017) Model reduction by new clustering method and frequency response matching. J Control Autom Electr Syst 28:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Martins N, Quintão PEM (2003) Computing dominant poles of power system multlvariable transfer functions. IEEE Trans Power Syst 11:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tiwari SK, Kaur G (2016) An improved method using factor division algorithm for reducing the order of linear dynamical system. Sadhana Acad Proc Eng Sci 41:589–595MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lal M, Mitra R (1974) Simplification of large system dynamics using a moment evaluation algorithm. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 19:602–603MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sikander A, Prasad R (2017) New technique for system simplification using Cuckoo search and ESA. Sadhana Acad Proc Eng Sci 42:1453–1458MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sikander A, Thakur P (2018) Reduced order modelling of linear time-invariant system using modified cuckoo search algorithm. Soft Comput 22:3449–3459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Philip B, Pal J (2010) An evolutionary computation based approach for reduced order modelling of linear systems. IEEE Int Conf Comput Intell Comput Res 2010:1–8Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mukherjee S, Mittal RC (2005) Model order reduction using response-matching technique. J Frankl Inst 342:503–519MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sambariya DK, Sharma O (2016) Model order reduction using Routh approximation and cuckoo search algorithm. J Autom Control 4:1–9Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yang J, Chen CS, Arbeu-Garcia JAD, Xu Y (1993) Model reduction of unstable systems. Int J Syst Sci 24:2407–2414MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Singh N, Prasad R (2010) Model reduction of unstable systems using linear transformation and balanced truncation. In: 4th International conference on computer applications in electrical engineering recent advances, February 19–21 2010, p 374Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Instrumentation EngineeringThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations